ACIT v. Kisco

44 Taxmann.com 356High Court2014#2575 most cited
45

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,339 Indian tax judgments — from 2019 to 2025.

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing ACIT v. Kisco

Sh. Baljinder Kumar Aggarwal 171, Model Town Ludhiana, Punjab vs. Jatin Abbi the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle-1 Ludhiana, Punjab

In the result, appeal of the Assessee is partly allowed

ITA 689/CHANDI/2024[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh17 Sept 2025AY 2012-2013

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No. 689/Chd/2024 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2012-13 बनाम Shri Baljinder Kumar Aggarwal, The Acit, 171, Model Town, Circle-1, Vs Ludhiana. Ludhiana. "थायी लेखा सं./Pan /Tan No: Bmcpk7473A अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent िनधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee By : Shri Sudhir Sehgal, Advocate राज"व क" ओर से/ Revenue By : Shri Manav Bansal, Cit, Dr तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 21.08.2025 उदघोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 17.09.2025

For Appellant: Shri Sudhir Sehgal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Manav Bansal, CIT, DR
Section 10(38)Section 143(1)Section 148

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण,च"डीगढ़ "यायपीठ , च"डीगढ़ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH BENCH ‘A’ CHANDIGARH BEFORE SHRI RAJPAL YADAV, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 689/CHD/2024 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2012-13 बनाम Shri Baljinder Kumar Aggarwal, The ACIT, 171, Model Town, Circle-1, VS Ludhiana. Ludhiana. "थायी लेखा सं./PAN /TAN No: BMCPK7473A अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent िनधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee by : Shri Sudhir Sehgal, Advocate राज"व क" ओर से/ Revenue by : Shri Manav Bansal, CIT, DR तारीख/Date of Hearing : 21.08.2025 उदघोषणा क" तारीख…

ACIT, Circle-2(2), New Delhi vs. M/S. Ansal Phalak Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi

ITA 217/DEL/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Dec 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri M. Balaganeshassessment Year: 2011-12 Income- Tax Officer, Vs. M/S. Ansal Phalak Ward-2(4), Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi 206, B Wing, 2Nd Floor, Naurang House, 21, Kasturba Gandi Marg, New Delhi Pan :Aafcp6583P (Appellant) (Respondent) With Ita Nos.216 & 217/Del/2020 Assessment Years: 2014-15 & 2015-16 Vs. M/S. Acit, Ansal Phalak Circle-2(2), Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi 115, Ansal Bhawan, Naurang House, 16, Kasturba Gandhi Marg, C.P., New Delhi Pan: Aafcp6583P (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By Sh. Ravi Sharma, Adv. Department By Ms. Jaya Choudhary, Cit(Dr) Sh. B.S. Anand, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 25.11.2024 Date Of Pronouncement 18.12.2024

Section 143(3)Section 68

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI BENCH: ‘E’ NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI M. BALAGANESH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Year: 2011-12 Income- Tax Officer, Vs. M/s. Ansal Phalak Ward-2(4), Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi 206, B Wing, 2nd Floor, Naurang House, 21, Kasturba Gandi Marg, New Delhi PAN :AAFCP6583P (Appellant) (Respondent) With ITA Nos.216 & 217/Del/2020 Assessment Years: 2014-15 & 2015-16 Vs. M/s. ACIT, Ansal Phalak Circle-2(2), Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi 115, Ansal Bhawan, Naurang House, 16, Kasturba Gandhi Marg, C.P., New Delhi PAN: AAFCP65…

ACIT, Circle-2(2), New Delhi vs. Ansal Phalak Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi

ITA 216/DEL/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Dec 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri M. Balaganeshassessment Year: 2011-12 Income- Tax Officer, Vs. M/S. Ansal Phalak Ward-2(4), Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi 206, B Wing, 2Nd Floor, Naurang House, 21, Kasturba Gandi Marg, New Delhi Pan :Aafcp6583P (Appellant) (Respondent) With Ita Nos.216 & 217/Del/2020 Assessment Years: 2014-15 & 2015-16 Vs. M/S. Acit, Ansal Phalak Circle-2(2), Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi 115, Ansal Bhawan, Naurang House, 16, Kasturba Gandhi Marg, C.P., New Delhi Pan: Aafcp6583P (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By Sh. Ravi Sharma, Adv. Department By Ms. Jaya Choudhary, Cit(Dr) Sh. B.S. Anand, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 25.11.2024 Date Of Pronouncement 18.12.2024

Section 143(3)Section 68

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI BENCH: ‘E’ NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI M. BALAGANESH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Year: 2011-12 Income- Tax Officer, Vs. M/s. Ansal Phalak Ward-2(4), Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi 206, B Wing, 2nd Floor, Naurang House, 21, Kasturba Gandi Marg, New Delhi PAN :AAFCP6583P (Appellant) (Respondent) With ITA Nos.216 & 217/Del/2020 Assessment Years: 2014-15 & 2015-16 Vs. M/s. ACIT, Ansal Phalak Circle-2(2), Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi 115, Ansal Bhawan, Naurang House, 16, Kasturba Gandhi Marg, C.P., New Delhi PAN: AAFCP65…

ITO, New Delhi vs. M/S. Ansal Phalak Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi

ITA 5658/DEL/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Dec 2024AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri M. Balaganeshassessment Year: 2011-12 Income- Tax Officer, Vs. M/S. Ansal Phalak Ward-2(4), Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi 206, B Wing, 2Nd Floor, Naurang House, 21, Kasturba Gandi Marg, New Delhi Pan :Aafcp6583P (Appellant) (Respondent) With Ita Nos.216 & 217/Del/2020 Assessment Years: 2014-15 & 2015-16 Vs. M/S. Acit, Ansal Phalak Circle-2(2), Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi 115, Ansal Bhawan, Naurang House, 16, Kasturba Gandhi Marg, C.P., New Delhi Pan: Aafcp6583P (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By Sh. Ravi Sharma, Adv. Department By Ms. Jaya Choudhary, Cit(Dr) Sh. B.S. Anand, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 25.11.2024 Date Of Pronouncement 18.12.2024

Section 143(3)Section 68

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI BENCH: ‘E’ NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI M. BALAGANESH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Year: 2011-12 Income- Tax Officer, Vs. M/s. Ansal Phalak Ward-2(4), Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi 206, B Wing, 2nd Floor, Naurang House, 21, Kasturba Gandi Marg, New Delhi PAN :AAFCP6583P (Appellant) (Respondent) With ITA Nos.216 & 217/Del/2020 Assessment Years: 2014-15 & 2015-16 Vs. M/s. ACIT, Ansal Phalak Circle-2(2), Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi 115, Ansal Bhawan, Naurang House, 16, Kasturba Gandhi Marg, C.P., New Delhi PAN: AAFCP65…

Sarika Tyagi, Ghazibad vs. DCIT, Central Circle, Ghazaibad

Accordingly, Ground No. 2 raised by the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1414/DEL/2022[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi10 Oct 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh & Shri Vimal Kumardcit, Vs. Sushil Tyagi, Central Circle, A-2, Ganpati Ghaziabad Apartments, Civil Lines, New Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan:Aejpt6739A Dcit, Vs. Yogender Singh, Central Circle, J-6A, Sector-23, Ghaziabad Sanjay Nagar, Ghaziabad (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan:Bgcos8548E Yogender Singh, Vs. Dcit, J-6A, Sector-23, Central Circle, Sanjay Nagar, Ghaziabad Ghaziabad (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan:Bgcos8548E Naveen Tyagi, Vs. Dcit, G-302, Vvip Central Circle, Addresses, Raj Nagar Ghaziabad Extention, Ghaziabad (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan:Admpt6420A Sarika Tyagi, Vs. Dcit, H-100, Patel Nagar,- Central Circle, 3, Ghaziabad Ghaziabad (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan:Afapt5986P Assessee By : Shri Rajeev Khandelwal, Ca Shri Gagan Khandelwal, Adv Shri Jaind Jaiswal, Adv Revenue By: Ms. Sapna Bhatia, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing 23/08/2024 Date Of Pronouncement /10/2024

For Appellant: Shri Rajeev Khandelwal, CAFor Respondent: Ms. Sapna Bhatia, CIT DR
Section 132Section 143(2)Section 68

…the creditor, the AO cannot make the addition without making inquiries :- -CIT vs. Laxman Industrial Resources Pvt. Ltd. [2017] 397 ITR 106 -CIT Vs. Rakam Money Matters Pvt. Ltd. -CIT vs. Orchid Industries Pvt. Ltd. 397 ITR 136 -CIT v Fair Finvest Ltd [2014] 44 Taxmann.com 356 -CIT v Gangeshwari Metal Pvt. Ltd. (2013) 30 Taxman.com 328 (Delhi) -Pr. CIT v Oriental International Company Pvt. Ltd. 2018 101 CCH 0004 Del 7. Looking into factual matrix of the case and after careful analysis of various judicial, interpretations of section 68 of IT Act in which genuineness of cash credit has been analyzed in detail and…

Yogender Singh, Ghaziabad vs. DCIT, Central Circle, Ghaziabad

Accordingly, Ground No. 2 raised by the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1413/DEL/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi10 Oct 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh & Shri Vimal Kumardcit, Vs. Sushil Tyagi, Central Circle, A-2, Ganpati Ghaziabad Apartments, Civil Lines, New Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan:Aejpt6739A Dcit, Vs. Yogender Singh, Central Circle, J-6A, Sector-23, Ghaziabad Sanjay Nagar, Ghaziabad (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan:Bgcos8548E Yogender Singh, Vs. Dcit, J-6A, Sector-23, Central Circle, Sanjay Nagar, Ghaziabad Ghaziabad (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan:Bgcos8548E Naveen Tyagi, Vs. Dcit, G-302, Vvip Central Circle, Addresses, Raj Nagar Ghaziabad Extention, Ghaziabad (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan:Admpt6420A Sarika Tyagi, Vs. Dcit, H-100, Patel Nagar,- Central Circle, 3, Ghaziabad Ghaziabad (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan:Afapt5986P Assessee By : Shri Rajeev Khandelwal, Ca Shri Gagan Khandelwal, Adv Shri Jaind Jaiswal, Adv Revenue By: Ms. Sapna Bhatia, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing 23/08/2024 Date Of Pronouncement /10/2024

For Appellant: Shri Rajeev Khandelwal, CAFor Respondent: Ms. Sapna Bhatia, CIT DR
Section 132Section 143(2)Section 68

…the creditor, the AO cannot make the addition without making inquiries :- -CIT vs. Laxman Industrial Resources Pvt. Ltd. [2017] 397 ITR 106 -CIT Vs. Rakam Money Matters Pvt. Ltd. -CIT vs. Orchid Industries Pvt. Ltd. 397 ITR 136 -CIT v Fair Finvest Ltd [2014] 44 Taxmann.com 356 -CIT v Gangeshwari Metal Pvt. Ltd. (2013) 30 Taxman.com 328 (Delhi) -Pr. CIT v Oriental International Company Pvt. Ltd. 2018 101 CCH 0004 Del 7. Looking into factual matrix of the case and after careful analysis of various judicial, interpretations of section 68 of IT Act in which genuineness of cash credit has been analyzed in detail and…

Naveen Tyagi, Ghaziabad vs. DCIT, Central Circle, Ghaziabad

Accordingly, Ground No. 2 raised by the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1412/DEL/2022[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi10 Oct 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh & Shri Vimal Kumardcit, Vs. Sushil Tyagi, Central Circle, A-2, Ganpati Ghaziabad Apartments, Civil Lines, New Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan:Aejpt6739A Dcit, Vs. Yogender Singh, Central Circle, J-6A, Sector-23, Ghaziabad Sanjay Nagar, Ghaziabad (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan:Bgcos8548E Yogender Singh, Vs. Dcit, J-6A, Sector-23, Central Circle, Sanjay Nagar, Ghaziabad Ghaziabad (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan:Bgcos8548E Naveen Tyagi, Vs. Dcit, G-302, Vvip Central Circle, Addresses, Raj Nagar Ghaziabad Extention, Ghaziabad (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan:Admpt6420A Sarika Tyagi, Vs. Dcit, H-100, Patel Nagar,- Central Circle, 3, Ghaziabad Ghaziabad (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan:Afapt5986P Assessee By : Shri Rajeev Khandelwal, Ca Shri Gagan Khandelwal, Adv Shri Jaind Jaiswal, Adv Revenue By: Ms. Sapna Bhatia, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing 23/08/2024 Date Of Pronouncement /10/2024

For Appellant: Shri Rajeev Khandelwal, CAFor Respondent: Ms. Sapna Bhatia, CIT DR
Section 132Section 143(2)Section 68

…the creditor, the AO cannot make the addition without making inquiries :- -CIT vs. Laxman Industrial Resources Pvt. Ltd. [2017] 397 ITR 106 -CIT Vs. Rakam Money Matters Pvt. Ltd. -CIT vs. Orchid Industries Pvt. Ltd. 397 ITR 136 -CIT v Fair Finvest Ltd [2014] 44 Taxmann.com 356 -CIT v Gangeshwari Metal Pvt. Ltd. (2013) 30 Taxman.com 328 (Delhi) -Pr. CIT v Oriental International Company Pvt. Ltd. 2018 101 CCH 0004 Del 7. Looking into factual matrix of the case and after careful analysis of various judicial, interpretations of section 68 of IT Act in which genuineness of cash credit has been analyzed in detail and…