ACIT v. J.P. Morgan India Investment Company Mauritius Limited

143 Taxmann.com 82Income Tax Appellate Tribunal2022#6248 most cited

What is ACIT v. J.P. Morgan India Investment Company Mauritius Limited authority for?

Where an assessee claims treaty benefits under Article 13(4) of the India-Mauritius DTAA, exempting capital gains from Indian taxation, brought forward short-term and long-term capital losses cannot be set off against such exempt gains, nor can they be carried forward to subsequent years.

18

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,314 Indian tax judgments — from 2024 to 2026.

Also referred to as

ACIT v. J.P. Morgan India Investment Company Mauritius Limited · section 90(3) · section 74 · DTAA · capital gains · treaty benefits · set off of losses · carry forward of losses · Article 13(4) · India-Mauritius DTAA

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing ACIT v. J.P. Morgan India Investment Company Mauritius Limited

Goldman Sachs Mauritius Nbfc Llc, Mumbai vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax – (International Taxation) - 2(3)(2), Mumbai

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 5926/MUM/2025[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai17 Feb 2026AY 2023-24

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Girish Agrawalassessment Year: 2023-24 Goldman Sachs Mauritius Nbfc Assistant Commissioner Of Llc, Income Tax – (International C/O Ernst & Young Llp, 14Th Taxation)-2(3)(2), Floor, The Ruby, 29 Senapati Room No.610, 6Th Floor Vs. Bapat Marg, Dadar West, Kautilya Bhavan, C-41 To C- Mumbai-400028 43, G Block, Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai-400051 (Pan: Aaecg8689C) (Appellant) (Respondent) Present For: Assessee : Shri Hiten Thakkar, Advocate Revenue : Shri Krishna Kumar, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing : 20.11.2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 17.02.2026 O R D E R Per Girish Agrawal: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Against The Final Assessment Order Passed By The Assessing Officer U/S.143(3) R.W.S. 144C(13) Of The Act Dated 14.07.2025, Pursuant To The Direction Issued By The Ld. Dispute Resolution Panel – 1, Mumbai Vide Order No. Itba/Drp/F/144C(5)/2025-26/1077165542(1), Dated 18.06.2025 Passed U/S. 144C(5) Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As The “Act”), For Ay 2023-24. 2. Grounds Taken By The Assessee Are Reproduced As Under:

For Appellant: Shri Hiten Thakkar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Krishna Kumar, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 144C(5)Section 270ASection 5Section 74

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “I” BENCH MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI GIRISH AGRAWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Year: 2023-24 Goldman Sachs Mauritius NBFC Assistant Commissioner of LLC, Income Tax – (International C/O Ernst & Young LLP, 14th Taxation)-2(3)(2), Floor, The Ruby, 29 Senapati Room No.610, 6th Floor Vs. Bapat Marg, Dadar West, Kautilya Bhavan, C-41 to C- Mumbai-400028 43, G Block, Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai-400051 (PAN: AAECG8689C) (Appellant) (Respondent) Present for: Assessee : Shri Hiten Thakkar, Advocate Revenue : Shri Krishna Kumar, Sr. DR Dat…

ACIT v. J.P. Morgan India Investment Company Mauritius Limited (143 Taxmann.com 82) — Cited in 18 Judgments | BharatTax