ACIT v. Golden Line Studio Pvt. Ltd.

98 Taxmann.com 299Reported decision2018#14529 most cited
7

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 348,631 Indian tax judgments — from 2023 to 2023.

Issues it is cited on

section 139(9)section 54ecannual valuesection 292bbsection 54fsection 292bsection 54section 292section 145(3)long term capital gainschange of opinionsection 29

Judgments citing ACIT v. Golden Line Studio Pvt. Ltd.

ACIT, Central Circle-2, Patna vs. Kumar Arunodaya, Patna

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed, the appeals of the revenue is dismissed and the Cross-objections of the assessee are also dismissed

ITA 98/PAT/2021[2016-17]Status: HeardITAT Patna07 Nov 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarma]

Section 143(3)Section 23

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “PATNA” BENCH: PATNA VIRTUAL HEARING AT KOLKATA [Before Shri Rajesh Kumar, Accountant Member & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Judicial Member] I.T.A. No. 33/PAT/2020 Assessment Year : 2013-14 Kumar Arunodaya Vs. ACIT, Circle-6, Patna (PAN: ACGPA 2478 J) Appellant / (अपीलाथ") Respondent / (""यथ") I.T.A. No. 89/PAT/2020 Assessment Year : 2012-13 DCIT, Circle-4, Patna Vs. Kumar Arunodaya (PAN: ACGPA 2478 J) Appellant / (अपीलाथ") Respondent / (""यथ") C.O. No. 2/PAT/2021 (Arising out of I.T.A. No. 89/PAT/2020) Assessment Year : 2012-13 Kumar Arunodaya Vs. DCIT, Circle-4, Patna (PAN: AC…

Kumar Arunodaya, Patna vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax - 6, Patna [New – Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle – 2, Patna]

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed, the appeals of the revenue is dismissed and the Cross-objections of the assessee are also dismissed

ITA 96/PAT/2021[2016-17]Status: HeardITAT Patna07 Nov 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarma]

Section 143(3)Section 23

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “PATNA” BENCH: PATNA VIRTUAL HEARING AT KOLKATA [Before Shri Rajesh Kumar, Accountant Member & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Judicial Member] I.T.A. No. 33/PAT/2020 Assessment Year : 2013-14 Kumar Arunodaya Vs. ACIT, Circle-6, Patna (PAN: ACGPA 2478 J) Appellant / (अपीलाथ") Respondent / (""यथ") I.T.A. No. 89/PAT/2020 Assessment Year : 2012-13 DCIT, Circle-4, Patna Vs. Kumar Arunodaya (PAN: ACGPA 2478 J) Appellant / (अपीलाथ") Respondent / (""यथ") C.O. No. 2/PAT/2021 (Arising out of I.T.A. No. 89/PAT/2020) Assessment Year : 2012-13 Kumar Arunodaya Vs. DCIT, Circle-4, Patna (PAN: AC…

ACIT, Circle-4, Patna vs. Kumar Arunodaya, Patna

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed, the appeals of the revenue is dismissed and the Cross-objections of the assessee are also dismissed

ITA 94/PAT/2020[2012-13]Status: HeardITAT Patna07 Nov 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarma]

Section 143(3)Section 23

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “PATNA” BENCH: PATNA VIRTUAL HEARING AT KOLKATA [Before Shri Rajesh Kumar, Accountant Member & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Judicial Member] I.T.A. No. 33/PAT/2020 Assessment Year : 2013-14 Kumar Arunodaya Vs. ACIT, Circle-6, Patna (PAN: ACGPA 2478 J) Appellant / (अपीलाथ") Respondent / (""यथ") I.T.A. No. 89/PAT/2020 Assessment Year : 2012-13 DCIT, Circle-4, Patna Vs. Kumar Arunodaya (PAN: ACGPA 2478 J) Appellant / (अपीलाथ") Respondent / (""यथ") C.O. No. 2/PAT/2021 (Arising out of I.T.A. No. 89/PAT/2020) Assessment Year : 2012-13 Kumar Arunodaya Vs. DCIT, Circle-4, Patna (PAN: AC…

DCIT, Circle-4, Patna vs. Kumar Arunodaya, Patna

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed, the appeals of the revenue is dismissed and the Cross-objections of the assessee are also dismissed

ITA 89/PAT/2020[2012-13]Status: HeardITAT Patna07 Nov 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarma]

Section 143(3)Section 23

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “PATNA” BENCH: PATNA VIRTUAL HEARING AT KOLKATA [Before Shri Rajesh Kumar, Accountant Member & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Judicial Member] I.T.A. No. 33/PAT/2020 Assessment Year : 2013-14 Kumar Arunodaya Vs. ACIT, Circle-6, Patna (PAN: ACGPA 2478 J) Appellant / (अपीलाथ") Respondent / (""यथ") I.T.A. No. 89/PAT/2020 Assessment Year : 2012-13 DCIT, Circle-4, Patna Vs. Kumar Arunodaya (PAN: ACGPA 2478 J) Appellant / (अपीलाथ") Respondent / (""यथ") C.O. No. 2/PAT/2021 (Arising out of I.T.A. No. 89/PAT/2020) Assessment Year : 2012-13 Kumar Arunodaya Vs. DCIT, Circle-4, Patna (PAN: AC…

Kumar Arunosaya, Patna vs. A.O., Circle-6, Patna

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed, the appeals of the revenue is dismissed and the Cross-objections of the assessee are also dismissed

ITA 33/PAT/2020[2013-14]Status: HeardITAT Patna07 Nov 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarma]

Section 143(3)Section 23

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “PATNA” BENCH: PATNA VIRTUAL HEARING AT KOLKATA [Before Shri Rajesh Kumar, Accountant Member & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Judicial Member] I.T.A. No. 33/PAT/2020 Assessment Year : 2013-14 Kumar Arunodaya Vs. ACIT, Circle-6, Patna (PAN: ACGPA 2478 J) Appellant / (अपीलाथ") Respondent / (""यथ") I.T.A. No. 89/PAT/2020 Assessment Year : 2012-13 DCIT, Circle-4, Patna Vs. Kumar Arunodaya (PAN: ACGPA 2478 J) Appellant / (अपीलाथ") Respondent / (""यथ") C.O. No. 2/PAT/2021 (Arising out of I.T.A. No. 89/PAT/2020) Assessment Year : 2012-13 Kumar Arunodaya Vs. DCIT, Circle-4, Patna (PAN: AC…

DCIT-4(1), Indore vs. M/S. Yaksha Infrastructure Com. Pvt. Ltd., Taloja, Raigarh

Appeal is dismissed

ITA 460/IND/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Indore14 Mar 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Ms. Madhumita Roy & Shri Bhagirath Mal Biyani

For Appellant: Shri Sumit Nema & shri GaganFor Respondent: Shri P. K. Mishra, CIT.D.R
Section 143(3)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL INDORE BENCH, INDORE (CONDUCTED THROUGH VIRTUAL COURT) BEFORE Ms. MADHUMITA ROY, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI BHAGIRATH MAL BIYANI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A. Nos.290/Ind/2019 & 460/Ind/2019 (Assessment Year: 2011-12) Vs. Yaksh Infrastructure Deputy Commissioner of Company Private Limited Income Tax-3(1) (Formerly known as Frolic Indore Realty Private Limited) [New – Assistant 205, Sujata Chambers, 2nd Commissioner of Income Floor, 1/3 Abhichand Gandhi Tax -4(1), Indore] Marg, Off. Katha Bazar, Masjid (West), Mumbai – 4000009 The Deputy Commissioner & M/s. Yaksh Infrastructure of Inc…

Yaksha Infrastructure Company (P) Ltd. (Formerly Known Frolic Realty (P) Ltd.), Mumbai vs. DCIT-3(1), Indore

Appeal is dismissed

ITA 290/IND/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Indore14 Mar 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Ms. Madhumita Roy & Shri Bhagirath Mal Biyani

For Appellant: Shri Sumit Nema & shri GaganFor Respondent: Shri P. K. Mishra, CIT.D.R
Section 143(3)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL INDORE BENCH, INDORE (CONDUCTED THROUGH VIRTUAL COURT) BEFORE Ms. MADHUMITA ROY, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI BHAGIRATH MAL BIYANI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A. Nos.290/Ind/2019 & 460/Ind/2019 (Assessment Year: 2011-12) Vs. Yaksh Infrastructure Deputy Commissioner of Company Private Limited Income Tax-3(1) (Formerly known as Frolic Indore Realty Private Limited) [New – Assistant 205, Sujata Chambers, 2nd Commissioner of Income Floor, 1/3 Abhichand Gandhi Tax -4(1), Indore] Marg, Off. Katha Bazar, Masjid (West), Mumbai – 4000009 The Deputy Commissioner & M/s. Yaksh Infrastructure of Inc…

ACIT v. Golden Line Studio Pvt. Ltd. (98 Taxmann.com 299) — Cited in 7 Judgments | BharatTax