ACIT v. Conor Granito (P.) Ltd.
159 Taxmann.com 1209Income Tax Appellate Tribunal2024#7269 most cited
What is ACIT v. Conor Granito (P.) Ltd. authority for?
Fixing a percentage of disallowance for bogus purchases must have a rational and non-arbitrary basis. Selective reliance on parts of a statement made under Section 132(4) while rejecting other parts is impermissible.
15
judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,005 Indian tax judgments — from 2024 to 2025.
Also referred to as
ACIT v. Conor Granito · Section 132(4) · bogus purchases · disallowance percentage · rational basis · arbitrary disallowance · selective reliance · retracted statement · search and seizure