ACIT v. Chandra Surana

149 Taxmann.com 379Income Tax Appellate Tribunal2023#10185 most cited

What is ACIT v. Chandra Surana authority for?

Addition under section 68 cannot be made for cash deposits if the assessee maintains regular books of account, bills, vouchers, and stock registers with complete quantitative details of cash sales, especially if such sales are accounted for.

10

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,314 Indian tax judgments — from 2023 to 2025.

Also referred to as

ACIT v Chandra Surana · section 68 · section 115BBE · section 143(3) · cash credits · unexplained money · demonetization · cash sales · books of account · genuineness of transaction · addition u/s 68 · ITAT Jaipur

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing ACIT v. Chandra Surana

Devngi Jewellwers Pvt. Ltd., Surat vs. DCIT, Circle-1(1)(1), Surat

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 672/SRT/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Surat13 Aug 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinha & Shri Bijayananda Pruseth, Accountant Mmber आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.672/Srt/2024 Assessment Year: (2017-18) (Hybrid Hearing) Devngi Jewellers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Dcit, 109 -110, Shreyas Diamond Centre, Circle – 1(1)(1), Mini Bazar, Varachha Road, Surat Surat - 395006 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No: Aabcd3227A (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By Shri Sapnesh R. Sheth, Ca Respondent By Shri Ravi Kant Gupta, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing 31/07/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 13/08/2025

Section 115BSection 142(1)Section 144Section 145(3)Section 250Section 68

…IN THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, SURAT BENCH, SURAT BEFORE SHRI DINESH MOHAN SINHA, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI BIJAYANANDA PRUSETH, ACCOUNTANT MMBER आयकरअपीलसं./ITA No.672/SRT/2024 Assessment Year: (2017-18) (Hybrid hearing) Devngi Jewellers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. DCIT, 109 -110, Shreyas Diamond Centre, Circle – 1(1)(1), Mini Bazar, Varachha Road, Surat Surat - 395006 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No: AABCD3227A (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by Shri Sapnesh R. Sheth, CA Respondent by Shri Ravi Kant Gupta, CIT-DR Date of Hearing 31/07/2025 Date of Pronouncement 13/08/2025 आदेश /O R D E R PER BIJAYANANDA PRUSETH, AM…

Income Tax Officer, Ward-2(1), Chandigarh vs. Atma Ram Jewellers, Chandigarh

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 206/CHANDI/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh17 Feb 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: This Tribunal. The Revenue Is Aggrieved By The Order Bearing No. Itba/Nfac/S/250/2023-24/1059539557 (1) Dated 10.01.2024 Passed By Cit(A) Under Section 250 Of The Act. The Relevant Assessment Year Is 2017-18 & The Previous Year Period Is From 01.04.2016 To 31.03.2017. 2. Factual Matrix 2.1 During The Year Under Consideration, The Assessee Was Engaged In The Business Of Trading Jewellery. 2.2 That The Assessee Filed Its Return Of Income For

For Appellant: Shri Tej Mohan Singh, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Vivek Vardhan, JCIT, Sr.DR
Section 143(3)Section 246ASection 250Section 253Section 6Section 69A

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण, चण्डीगढ़ न्यायपीठ, चण्डीगढ़ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH BENCH 'A' CHANDIGARH BEFORE: SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI PARESH M. JOSHI, JUDICIAL MEMBER, आयकर अपील सं./ITA No. 206/CHD/2024 निर्धारण वर्ष /Assessment Year : 2017-18 The ITO, Ward 2(1), Chandigarh. Vs Atma Ram Jewellers, SCO 806, NAC Mani Majra, Chandigarh. स्थायीलेखासं./PAN /TAN No:ABCFA2112L अपीलार्थी/Appellant प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent निर्धारिती की ओर से/Assessee by : Shri Tej Mohan Singh, Advocate राजस्व की ओर से/Revenue by : Shri Vivek Vardhan, JCIT, Sr.DR तारीख/Date of Hearing : 18.12.2024…

Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Cuddalore vs. Cholaji Kanniyalal, Kamaraj Street, Villupuram

In the result, appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed and cross objection filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 1674/CHNY/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai28 Nov 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi, Hon’Ble & Shri S. R. Raghunatha, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.: 1674/Chny/2024 & Co No.: 51/Chny/2024 िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2017-18 Assistant Commissioner Of Cholaji Kanniyalal, Income Tax, V. No. 191, Kamaraj Street, Circle -1, Villupuram, Cuddalore – 607 002. Tamil Nadu – 605 602. [Pan: Aaepk-4555-E] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (Respondent/Cross Objector) Assessee By : Ms. Gouthami Manivasagam, Jcit Department By : Ms. Nidhi D. Jain, Ca सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 02.09.2024 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 28.11.2024

For Appellant: Ms. Gouthami Manivasagam, JCITFor Respondent: Ms. Nidhi D. Jain, CA
Section 139(1)Section 44ASection 68

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, ‘बी’ "यायपीठ, चे"ई IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘B’ BENCH, CHENNAI "ी एस एस िव"ने" रिव, "याियक सद"य एवं "ी एस. आर. रघुनाथा, लेखा सद"य के सम" BEFORE SHRI S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI, HON’BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI S. R. RAGHUNATHA, HON’BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकरअपीलसं./ITA No.: 1674/Chny/2024 & CO No.: 51/Chny/2024 िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2017-18 Assistant Commissioner of Cholaji Kanniyalal, Income Tax, v. No. 191, Kamaraj Street, Circle -1, Villupuram, Cuddalore – 607 002. Tamil nadu – 605 602. [PAN: AAEPK-4555-E] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (Respondent/Cross Objector) Assessee by : Ms. Go…

Jaykumar Nemichand Jain, HUF, Ahmedabad vs. The ITO, Ward-5(2)(2), Ahmedabad

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 944/AHD/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad30 Oct 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokarआयकर अपील सं /Ita No.944/Ahd/2023 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year : 2017-18 Jaykumar Nemichand Jain Huf The Ito बनाम Jain Silver Palace Ward-5(2)(2) / 39, Chinubhai Towers Ahmedabad V/S. Ashram Road Opp. Handloom House Ahmedabad – 380 009 (Gujarat) "थायी लेखा सं./Pan: Aadhj 7308 F अपीलाथ%/ (Appellant) &' यथ%/ (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Divyang Shah, Ar Revenue By : Shri B.P. Srivastava, Sr.Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 21/10/2024 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 30/10/2024 आदेश/O R D E R Per Makarand V. Mahadeokar, Am:

For Appellant: Shri Divyang Shah, ARFor Respondent: Shri B.P. Srivastava, Sr.DR
Section 115BSection 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 271ASection 69A

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, अहमदाबाद "ायपीठ “ए“, अहमदाबाद । IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “ A ” BENCH, AHMEDABAD सु"ी सुिच"ा का"ले, "ाियक सद" एवं "ी मकरंद वसंत महादेवकर, लेखा सद" के सम"। ] ] BEFORE MS. SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI MAKARAND V. MAHADEOKAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं /ITA No.944/Ahd/2023 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year : 2017-18 Jaykumar Nemichand Jain HUF The ITO बनाम Jain Silver Palace Ward-5(2)(2) / 39, Chinubhai Towers Ahmedabad v/s. Ashram Road Opp. Handloom House Ahmedabad – 380 009 (Gujarat) "थायी लेखा सं./PAN: AADHJ 7308 F अपीलाथ%/ (Appellant) &' यथ%/ (Respondent) Assessee by…

ACIT v. Chandra Surana (149 Taxmann.com 379) — Cited in 10 Judgments | BharatTax