ACIT, Central Circle, Patiala v. Munish Kumar Goyal

45 Taxmann.com 563Reported decision2014#12815 most cited
8

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,314 Indian tax judgments — from 2016 to 2020.

Judgments citing ACIT, Central Circle, Patiala v. Munish Kumar Goyal

Sh. Narendra Kumar Agarwal, New Delhi vs. DCIT, New Delhi

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed

ITA 4107/DEL/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Oct 2017AY 2009-10

Bench: Sh. N.K.Saini & Sh.K.N.Charynarendra Kumar Agarwal, Vs Dcit, 5, Central Avenue, Central Circle-12, 1St Floor, Maharani Bagh, New Delhi-110055. New Delhi-110065. Pan-Adepa3716G (Appellant) (Respondent) Kishore Kumar Agarwal, Vs Dcit, B-308, New Friends Colony, Central Circle-12, New Delhi-110065. New Delhi-110055. Pan-Afipa5132Q (Appellant) (Respondent) Hemant Kumar Agarwal, Vs Dcit, 70, Nehru Nagar, Agra. Central Circle-12, Pan-Abhpa9867D New Delhi-110055. (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By Sh. Pankaj Garg, Adv. Respondent By M/S. Shefali Swroop, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing 14.09.2017 Date Of Pronouncement .09.2017 Order Per K.N.Charyall These Three Appeals Relating To Ay 2009-10 Are Filed Challenging The Orders Dated 19.05.2014 In The Cases Of Three Different Assessees Covered By The Search Operations Carried Out In Rajdarbar Group Of Cases On 31.07.2008. Facts Are

Section 271A

…[2014] 41 Taxmann.com 234 (Delhi High COurt); Neerat SInghal vs ACIT, Central Circle, New Delhi [2013] 37 Taxmann.com 189 (ITAT, Delhi); Pramod Kumar Jain vs DCIT [2013] 33 Taxmann.com 651 (ITAT, Cuttack); ACIT, Central Circle vs Munish Kumar Goyal [2014] 45 Taxmann.com 563 (ITAT, pg. 3 ITA No.4107- 4109/Del/2015 Chandigarh); and ACIT vs A.N.Annamalaisamy (HUF) [2013] 38 Taxmann.com 440 (ITAT, Chennai) for the principle that where the assessee having surrender certain income in the course of search filed return wherein the said amount was duly disclosed and the taxes were paid accordingly. Facts of the…

Options Developrs and Builders, Mumbai vs. DCIT Ce Cir 22, Mumbai

The appeal of the assessee is allowed and the ld

ITA 7129/MUM/2013[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai24 May 2016AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Joginder Singh & Shri Ashwani Tanejaassessment Year: 2010-11 Options Developers & Acit, Central Circle-22, Builders, Room No.465, बनाम/ 10, Mithila Shopping Centre Aayakar Bhavan, Vs. Ground Floor, V. M. Road, M.K. Road, Juhu Scheme Vile Parle (W) Mumbai-400020 Mumbai-400049 ("नधा"रती /Assessee) (राज"व /Revenue) Pan. No.Aaafo6752F "नधा"रती क" ओर से / Assessee By Shri Vijay Kothari Ms. Sudha Ramchandran-Dr राज"व क" ओर से / Revenue By 05/05/2016 सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of Hearing : 16/05/2016 आदेश क" तार"ख /Date Of Order:

Section 132Section 271A

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, मुंबई "यायपीठ, सी,मुंबई । IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCHES “C”, MUMBAI "ी जो"ग"दर "संह, "या"यक सद"य एवं "ी अ"नी तनेजा, लेखा सद"य, के सम" Before Shri Joginder Singh, Judicial Member, and Shri Ashwani Taneja, Accountant Member Assessment Year: 2010-11 Options Developers & ACIT, Central Circle-22, Builders, Room No.465, बनाम/ 10, Mithila Shopping Centre Aayakar Bhavan, Vs. Ground Floor, V. M. Road, M.K. Road, Juhu Scheme Vile Parle (W) Mumbai-400020 Mumbai-400049 ("नधा"रती /Assessee) (राज"व /Revenue) PAN. No.AAAFO6752F "नधा"रती क" ओर से / Assessee by Shri Vijay Kothari Ms. Su…

ACIT, Central Circle, Patiala v. Munish Kumar Goyal (45 Taxmann.com 563) — Cited in 8 Judgments | BharatTax