ACIT, New Delhi vs. Sh. Harveer Singh Kalra, New Delhi
In the result, the appeals of the department are dismissed
ITA 6441/DEL/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 May 2017AY 2009-10
Bench: Sh. N. K. Sainiita Nos. 6438 & 6439/Del/2016 : Asstt. Years : 2010-11 & 2011-12 Acit, Vs Smt. Mehar Anand, Central Circle-14, A-29, Defence Colony, New Delhi-110055 New Delhi-110065 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Afepa9193B Ita Nos. 6440 & 6441/Del/2016 : Asstt. Years : 2009-10 & 2011-12 Acit, Vs Sh. Harveer Singh Kalra, Central Circle-14, A-29, Defence Colony, New Delhi-110055 New Delhi-110065 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Afbpk6171Q Assessee By : Sh. Ved Jain, Adv. & Sh. Ashish Chadha, Ca Revenue By : Sh. Amrit Lal, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing : 16.05.2017 Date Of Pronouncement : 31.05.2017 Order These Appeals By The Department Are Directed Against The Separate Orders Each Dated 07.09.2016 Of Ld. Cit(A)-Xxvi, New Delhi.
For Appellant: Sh. Ved Jain, Adv. &For Respondent: Sh. Amrit Lal, Sr. DR
Section 139(1)Section 153ASection 271(1)(c)
…reads as under:- "271(1)(c) has concealed the particulars of his income or furnished inaccurate particulars of such income, or" 7. The AO has also discussed a judgment of Chennai Bench of the ITAT in the case of ACIT, Central Circle-2(5), vs Smt. J. Mithilil 149 ITD 275 to support its penalty order. In this regard it is submitted that it was found during the search that assessee has made investment in immovable properties. This investment the assessee has declared as 'other income' in the return filed under Section 153A. The penalty was levied on such amount. Your honour will appreciate there was identification…