Abhin Anilkumar Shah v. ITO,International Taxation

166 Taxmann.com 679Reported decision2024#16926 most cited

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 341,001 Indian tax judgments — from 2025 to 2026.

Sections most often in play

Section 144B Section 147 Section 148 Section 151A Section 148A Section 69 Section 69A Section 115BBE

Issues it is cited on

section 151a section 148a faceless assessment section 119 section 151 section 144b notice under section 148 assistant commissioner section 15 section 11 section 69 section 148

Judgments citing Abhin Anilkumar Shah v. ITO,International Taxation

Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Nizamabad vs. Bharat Thakker Kalpana, Nizamabad

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1456/HYD/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad28 Jan 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Manjunatha G.आ.अपी.सं /Ita No.1456/Hyd/2025 Assessment Year 2017-2018 The Income Tax Officer, Bharat Thakker Kalpana Ward-1, Nizamabad – 503 001. Vs. Nizamabad. Pan Afkpt4232Q (Appellant) (Respondent) िनधा"रती "ारा /Assessee By: -None- राज" व "ारा /Revenue By: Ms P Sumitha, Sr. Ar सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing: 13.01.2026 घोषणा की तारीख/Pronouncement: 28.01.2026 आदेश/Order

For Appellant: -None-For Respondent: MS P Sumitha, Sr. AR

Section 143(1)(a)Section 144BSection 147Section 148Section 148ASection 151A

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, हैदराबाद पीठ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL Hyderabad ‘SMC’ Bench, Hyderabad BEFORE SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI MANJUNATHA G. ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आ.अपी.सं /ITA No.1456/Hyd/2025 Assessment Year 2017-2018 The Income Tax Officer, Bharat Thakker Kalpana Ward-1, NIZAMABAD – 503 001. vs. NIZAMABAD. PAN AFKPT4232Q (Appellant) (Respondent) िनधा"रती "ारा /Assessee by: -None- राज" व "ारा /Revenue by: MS P Sumitha, Sr. AR सुनवाई की तारीख/Date of hearing: 13.01.2026 घोषणा की तारीख/Pronouncement: 28.01.2026 आदेश/ORDER PER VIJAY PAL RAO, VICE PRESIDENT : This appeal by the Revenu…

Prakash Reddy Vatti, Hyderabad vs. ITO, Ward-11(1), Hyderabad

In the result, appeal of the Assessee is allowed

ITA 1806/HYD/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad23 Jan 2026AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Raoआ.अपी.सं /Ita No.1806/Hyd/2025 Assessment Year 2015-2016 Vatti Prakash Reddy, The Income Tax Officer, Hyderabad – 500 018. Ward-11(1), Hyderabad. Vs. Telangana. Pin – 500 017. Pan Aaspv8120C Telangana. (Appellant) (Respondent) िनधा"रती "ारा /Assessee By: Ca A Vamseedhar राज" व "ारा /Revenue By: Ms P Sumitha, Sr. Ar सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing: 15.01.2026 घोषणा की तारीख/Pronouncement: 23.01.2026 आदेश/Order

For Appellant: CA A VamseedharFor Respondent: MS P Sumitha, Sr. AR

Section 115BSection 144B(7)(vii)Section 148Section 148ASection 149(1)(b)Section 151Section 151ASection 250(6)Section 69A

…1 ITA.No.1806/Hyd./2025 आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, हैदराबाद पीठ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL Hyderabad ‘SMC’ Bench, Hyderabad BEFORE SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, VICE PRESIDENT आ.अपी.सं /ITA No.1806/Hyd/2025 Assessment Year 2015-2016 Vatti Prakash Reddy, The Income Tax Officer, Hyderabad – 500 018. Ward-11(1), Hyderabad. vs. Telangana. PIN – 500 017. PAN AASPV8120C Telangana. (Appellant) (Respondent) िनधा"रती "ारा /Assessee by: CA A Vamseedhar राज" व "ारा /Revenue by: MS P Sumitha, Sr. AR सुनवाई की तारीख/Date of hearing: 15.01.2026 घोषणा की तारीख/Pronouncement: 23.01.2026 आदेश/ORDER PER VIJAY PAL RAO, VICE PRESIDE…

Gurjit Singh, Ropar vs. Income Tax Officer, Rupnagar

Appeal stand allowed accordingly

ITA 1175/CHANDI/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh13 Jan 2026AY 2019-20

Bench: Tribunal.

For Appellant: Sh. Shashi Kant Sharma (ITP) – Ld. ARFor Respondent: Sh. Vivek Vardhan (Addl. CIT) – Ld. Sr. DR

Section 144BSection 147Section 148Section 151ASection 69

…pleaded that such faceless scheme is not applicable to Central charges and International Taxation matters. I find that this controversy also has been dealt with by Hon’ble Bombay High Court in the case of Abhin Anilkumar Shah vs. ITO (International Taxation) (166 Taxmann.com 679 dated 28-08-2024) wherein Hon’ble Court, referring to the decision in Hexaware Technologies Ltd. vs. ACIT (464 ITR 430), dealt with a case of international charge and adjudicated the controversy in favor of the assessee as under: - 12. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Mistry, the learned amicus, it is clear to u…

Pooja Aggarwal, Panchkula vs. ACIT(Central) Shimla, Shimla

Appeal stand allowed in terms of our above order

ITA 1026/CHANDI/2025[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh24 Nov 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Rajpal Yadav & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am आयकरअपीलसं./ Ita No.1026/Chandi/2025 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2021-22) Ms. Pooja Aggarwal Acit Central बनाम/ Vs. House No.218,Sector-10 Shimla 171001 Panchkula – 134113 "ायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Abnpa-6660-N (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ"कीओरसे/ Appellant By : Sh. Ajay Jain (Ca)A/W Shri Lovesh Bansal (Ca) – Ld. Ars ""थ"कीओरसे/Respondent By : Smt. Kusum Bansal (Cit) – Ld. Dr सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date Of Hearing : 15-09-2025 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 24/11/2025 आदेश / O R D E R Manoj Kumar Aggarwal () 1. Aforesaid Appeal By Assessee For Assessment Year (Ay) 2021-22 Arises Out Of An Order Of Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-3, Gurgaon [Cit(A)] Dated 31-07-2025 In The Matter Of An Assessment Framed By Ld. Ao U/S 147 Of The Act On 12-03-2025. The Assessee Is Aggrieved By Confirmation Of Substantive Addition Of Rs.16.21 Lacs & Protective Addition Of Rs.10.95 Lacs. The Additions Stem From Search Action By The Department On Assessee-Group On 04-

For Appellant: Sh. Ajay Jain (CA)a/w Shri Lovesh BansalFor Respondent: Smt. Kusum Bansal (CIT) – Ld. DR

Section 127Section 144BSection 147Section 148Section 151A

…pleaded that such faceless scheme is not applicable to Central charges and International Taxation matters. We find that this controversy also has been dealt with by Hon’ble Bombay High Court in the case of Abhin Anilkumar Shah vs. ITO, international Taxation 166 Taxmann.com 679 dated 28-08-2024) wherein Hon’ble Court, referring to the decision in Hexaware Technologies Ltd. vs. ACIT (464 ITR 430), dealt with a case of international charge and adjudicated the controversy in favor of the assessee as under: - 12. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Mistry, the learned amicus, it is clear to…

Anup Kumar Aggarwal, Panchkula vs. ACIT(Central) Shimla, Shimla

Appeal stand allowed in terms of our above order

ITA 1019/CHANDI/2025[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh24 Nov 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Rajpal Yadav & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am आयकरअपीलसं./ Ita No.1019/Chandi/2025 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2021-22) Sh. Anup Kumar Aggarwal Acit (Central) बनाम/ Vs. House No.218,Sector-10 Shimla 171001 Panchkula – 134113 "ायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Adjpk-5842-L (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ"कीओरसे/ Appellant By : Sh. Ajay Jain (Ca) A/W Shri Lovesh Bansal (Ca) – Ld. Ars ""थ"कीओरसे/Respondent By : Smt. Kusum Bansal (Cit) – Ld. Dr सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date Of Hearing : 15-09-2025 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 24/11/2025 आदेश / O R D E R Manoj Kumar Aggarwal () 1. Aforesaid Appeal By Assessee For Assessment Year (Ay) 2021-22 Arises Out Of An Order Of Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-3, Gurgaon [Cit(A)] Dated 31-07-2025 In The Matter Of An Assessment Framed By Ld. Ao U/S 147 Of The Act On 12-03-2025. The Assessee Is Aggrieved By Confirmation Of Additions Of Rs.10.95 Lacs U/S 69 & Another Addition Of Rs.16.21 Lacs U/S 69A. The Additions Stem From Search Action By The Department On Assessee-Group On 04-

For Appellant: Sh. Ajay Jain (CA) a/w Shri Lovesh BansalFor Respondent: Smt. Kusum Bansal (CIT) – Ld. DR

Section 127Section 144BSection 147Section 148Section 151ASection 69Section 69A