Abdul Kayoom (K.T.M.T.M.) v. Commissioner of Income Tax
44 ITR 689Supreme Court of India1962#2250 most cited
What is Abdul Kayoom (K.T.M.T.M.) v. Commissioner of Income Tax authority for?
To determine if an expenditure is capital or revenue, one must consider the nature of the business, the expenditure, the right acquired, and their inter-relation. The concept of 'enduring benefit' is descriptive and relative, not synonymous with perpetual.
51
judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,314 Indian tax judgments — from 2012 to 2024.
Also referred to as
Abdul Kayoom v CIT · K.T.M.T.M. Abdul Kayoom · 44 ITR 689 · capital expenditure · revenue expenditure · enduring benefit test · nature of business · nature of right acquired · section 10(2)(xv) · section 10(2)