9 & 1192/JPR/2024\nShri Pradeep Kumar Dusad\n85\nxiv. Contech Transport Service (P) ltd Ors. v. ACIT

19 DTR 191Reported decision2009#19640 most cited
4

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 341,001 Indian tax judgments — from 2020 to 2025.

Judgments citing 9 & 1192/JPR/2024\nShri Pradeep Kumar Dusad\n85\nxiv. Contech Transport Service (P) ltd Ors. v. ACIT

Shri Ashok Dharendra, Jaipur vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Jaipur

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 256/JPR/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur12 Apr 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain, Jm & Shri Rathod Kamlesh Jayantbhai, Am Vk;Dj Vihy La-@Ita No. 256/Jp/2018 Fu/Kzkj.K O"Kz@Assessment Year :2015-16 Shri Ashok Dharendra, Cuke D.C.I.T. 23, Shivraj Niketan Scheme, Vs. Central Circle-3, Gautam Marg, Nr Vaishali Jaipur. Nagar Circle, Jaipur. Lfkk;H Ys[Kk La-@Thvkbzvkj La-@Pan/Gir No.: Aavpd 6554 B Vihykfkhz@Appellant Izr;Fkhz@Respondent Fu/Kzkfjrh Dh Vksj Ls@ Assessee By : Shri Manish Agarwal (Ca) Jktlo Dh Vksj Ls@ Revenue By : Shri S. Najmi (Cit-Dr) Lquokbz Dh Rkjh[K@ Date Of Hearing : 02/02/2022 Mn?Kks"K.Kk Dh Rkjh[K@ Date Of Pronouncement : 12 /04/2022 Vkns'K@ Order Per: Sandeep Gosain, J.M. This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of Ld. Cit(A)- 4, Jaipur Dated 01/12/2017 For The A.Y. 2015-16 In The Matter Of Order Passed U/S 143(3) Read With Section 153B(1)(B) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (In Short, The Act), Wherein Following Grounds Have Been Taken. “1. On The Facts & In The Circumstances Of The Case The Ld. Cit(A) Has Grossly Erred In Confirming The Addition Of Rs. 1,50,00,000/- Made In The Assessment Completed U/S 143(3) R.W.S. 153B(1)(B) Solely On The Basis Of Statements Recorded During The Course Of Search Which Stood Retracted By The Assessee Through An Affidavit Filed. Thus, The Addition Made Solely On The Basis Of Such Retracted Statements Deserves To Be Deleted.

For Appellant: Shri Manish Agarwal (CA)For Respondent: Shri S. Najmi (CIT-DR)
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153B(1)(b)Section 3

…g on record cogent material and other evidences to support the addition rather than simply rely on the statement. In this case the position is exactly the same. The following case laws are cited in support: - (a) Contech Transport Service (P) ltd Ors V/s ACIT 19 DTR 191 (Mumbai) (b) Chitra Devi V/s ACIT (Jodhpur Branch) (2002) 77 TTJ (Jd) 640 (c) Kailashhen Manharlal ChokshiVs CIT (2008) 14 DTR 257 (Guj) (d) Pullanguegode Rubber & Produce Co. Ltd. Vs. State of Kerala 91 ITR 18 (SC) (e) Kailash Ben MohanlalChoksi v/s CIT (2008) 14 DTR (Guj) 257 ITA 324/JP/2017 & 1 Anr (f) Hukum Chand Jain Vs. Income Tax Officer (2…

9 & 1192/JPR/2024\nShri Pradeep Kumar Dusad\n85\nxiv. Contech Transport Service (P) ltd Ors. v. ACIT (19 DTR 191) — Cited in 4 Judgments | BharatTax