75 (SC) Grandhi Sri Venkata Amarendra v. JCIT

172 Taxmann.com 54High Court2025#10267 most cited

What is 75 (SC) Grandhi Sri Venkata Amarendra v. JCIT authority for?

The date on which the Assessing Officer writes to the Additional/Joint CIT regarding a violation attracting penalty under section 271D is to be reckoned as the date on which action for imposition of penalty was initiated, particularly in the absence of assessment orders for relevant assessment years.

10

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,314 Indian tax judgments — from 2025 to 2026.

Also referred to as

Grandhi Sri Venkata Amarendra v. JCIT · section 269SS · section 271D · initiation of penalty · date of letter · absence of assessment order

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing 75 (SC) Grandhi Sri Venkata Amarendra v. JCIT

Maleckunnel Philip Varghese, Sambalpur vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle, Sambalpur

In the result, both appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 258/CTK/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack12 Aug 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rajesh Kumarआयकर अपील सं/Ita No.256/Ctk/2025 & आयकर अपील सं/Ita No.258/Ctk/2025 (नििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2017-2018) Maleckunnel Philip Varghese Vs Dcit, Central Circle, Sambalpur At/Po/Ps: Ainthapali, Dist : Sambalpur-768004 Pan No. :Abvpv 8418 K (अपीलार्थी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) नििााररती की ओर से /Assessee By : Sh P.K.Mishra, Himanshu Jena & Narahari Swain, Ars राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Ashim Kumar Chakraborty, Cit-Dr सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 12/08/2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 12/08/2025

For Appellant: Sh P.K.Mishra, Himanshu Jena &For Respondent: Shri Ashim Kumar Chakraborty, CIT-DR
Section 269SSection 271(1)(c)Section 271DSection 271E

…sआयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण, कटक न्यायपीठ,कटक IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL CUTTACK BENCH CUTTACK (THROUGH VIRTUAL HEARING) श्री जाजज माथन, न्याययक सदस्य एवं श्री राजेश कुमार, लेखा सदस्य के समक्ष । BEFORE SHRI GEORGE MATHAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं/ITA No.256/CTK/2025 AND आयकर अपील सं/ITA No.258/CTK/2025 (नििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2017-2018) Maleckunnel Philip Varghese Vs DCIT, Central Circle, Sambalpur AT/PO/PS: Ainthapali, Dist : Sambalpur-768004 PAN No. :ABVPV 8418 K (अपीलार्थी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) नििााररती की ओर से /Assessee by : Sh P.K…

Maleckunnel Philip Varghese, Sambalpur vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle, Sambalpur

In the result, both appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 256/CTK/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack12 Aug 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rajesh Kumarआयकर अपील सं/Ita No.256/Ctk/2025 & आयकर अपील सं/Ita No.258/Ctk/2025 (नििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2017-2018) Maleckunnel Philip Varghese Vs Dcit, Central Circle, Sambalpur At/Po/Ps: Ainthapali, Dist : Sambalpur-768004 Pan No. :Abvpv 8418 K (अपीलार्थी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) नििााररती की ओर से /Assessee By : Sh P.K.Mishra, Himanshu Jena & Narahari Swain, Ars राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Ashim Kumar Chakraborty, Cit-Dr सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 12/08/2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 12/08/2025

For Appellant: Sh P.K.Mishra, Himanshu Jena &For Respondent: Shri Ashim Kumar Chakraborty, CIT-DR
Section 269SSection 271(1)(c)Section 271DSection 271E

…sआयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण, कटक न्यायपीठ,कटक IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL CUTTACK BENCH CUTTACK (THROUGH VIRTUAL HEARING) श्री जाजज माथन, न्याययक सदस्य एवं श्री राजेश कुमार, लेखा सदस्य के समक्ष । BEFORE SHRI GEORGE MATHAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं/ITA No.256/CTK/2025 AND आयकर अपील सं/ITA No.258/CTK/2025 (नििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2017-2018) Maleckunnel Philip Varghese Vs DCIT, Central Circle, Sambalpur AT/PO/PS: Ainthapali, Dist : Sambalpur-768004 PAN No. :ABVPV 8418 K (अपीलार्थी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) नििााररती की ओर से /Assessee by : Sh P.K…

75 (SC) Grandhi Sri Venkata Amarendra v. JCIT (172 Taxmann.com 54) — Cited in 10 Judgments | BharatTax