616 (Raj.) and 9. CIT v. Hemla Embroidery Mills (P) Ltd.

217 Taxmann 207High Court2013#569 most cited

What is 616 (Raj.) and 9. CIT v. Hemla Embroidery Mills (P) Ltd. authority for?

Prior to the insertion of Explanation 2 to Section 36(1)(va) of the Income-tax Act, there was an ambiguity regarding the due date for payment of employees' contribution to provident fund and ESI. The ambiguity was whether the due date was as per the respective Acts or the due date for filing the assessee's return of income.

170

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,470 Indian tax judgments — from 2017 to 2026.

Also referred to as

CIT v. Hemla Embroidery Mills (P) Ltd. · Section 36(1)(va) · employees' contribution · provident fund · ESI · due date · ambiguity · Explanation 2 · return of income

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing 616 (Raj.) and 9. CIT v. Hemla Embroidery Mills (P) Ltd.