441 (P&H). (iv) Sonia Gandhi v. ACIT, Circle-52(1)

97 Taxmann.com 150High Court2018#4079 most cited

What is 441 (P&H). (iv) Sonia Gandhi v. ACIT, Circle-52(1) authority for?

The satisfaction of the Principal Commissioner under Section 151(1) for issuing a notice under Section 148 requires the Principal Commissioner to record their satisfaction that the Assessing Officer's reasons make it a fit case for issuing such notice. This satisfaction is a prerequisite for the validity of the notice.

29

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,339 Indian tax judgments — from 2019 to 2021.

Also referred to as

Sonia Gandhi v. ACIT · Section 148 notice · Section 151 approval · Principal Commissioner satisfaction · reassessment validity · reasons for notice · Delhi High Court

Judgments citing 441 (P&H). (iv) Sonia Gandhi v. ACIT, Circle-52(1)

Goel Wax (P) Ltd., New Delhi vs. ITO, Ward-11(4), New Delhi

In the result, the Appeal filed by the Assessee stands partly allowed

ITA 2075/DEL/2018[2008-809]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi07 Jan 2020AY 2008-809

Bench: Shri H.S. Sidhuassessment Year : 2008-09

For Appellant: Sh. Raj Kumar, CAFor Respondent: Sh. Manoj Kumar Chopra, Sr. DR
Section 132Section 139(1)Section 143(2)Section 147Section 148Section 68

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCHES : SMC : NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI H.S. SIDHU, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year : 2008-09 M/S GOEL WAX (P) LTD., Vs. ITO, WARD 11(4), C/O RAJ KUMAR & ASSOCIATES, NEW DELHI CAs, L-7A, SOUTH EXTENSION, PART-2, NEW DELHI – 49 (PAN: AAACG0121F) (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : Sh. Raj Kumar, CA Department by : Sh. Manoj Kumar Chopra, Sr. DR. ORDER This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order passed by the Ld. CIT(A)-35, New Delhi on 01.12.2017 in relation to the assessment year 2008-09 on the following grounds:- 1. That under the facts and c…

Jai Pal, Panipat vs. ITO Ward 2, Panipat

In the result, the Appeal filed by the Assessee stands partly allowed

ITA 2750/DEL/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi06 Jan 2020AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri H.S. Sidhuassessment Year : 2010-11

For Appellant: Ms. Rano Jain, Adv. & Ms. Mansi Jain, CAFor Respondent: Sh. Pradeep Singh Gautam, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 151

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCHE : SMC : NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI H.S. SIDHU, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year : 2010-11 JAI PAL, Vs. ITO, WARD-2, H.NO. 2198, E-BLOCK, PANIPAT ANSAL SUSHANT CITY, PANIPAT HARYANA (PAN: ASCPS2095M) (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : Ms. Rano Jain, Adv. & Ms. Mansi Jain, CA Department by : Sh. Pradeep Singh Gautam, Sr. DR. ORDER This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order passed by the Ld. CIT(A), Karnal on 23.01.2019 in relation to the assessment year 2010-11 on the following grounds:- 1. On the facts and circumstances of the case, the or…

Apc Air Systems P.Ltd, New Delhi vs. ITO, Ward-3(1), New Delhi

In the result, the Appeal filed by the Assessee stands partly allowed

ITA 4715/DEL/2018[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi01 Jan 2020AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri H.S. Sidhuassessment Year : 2008-09

For Appellant: Mrs. Sonia Rani, CAFor Respondent: Sh. Pradeep Singh Gautam, Sr. DR
Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 151

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCHE : SMC : NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI H.S. SIDHU, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year : 2008-09 APC AIR SYSTEMS P. LTD., Vs. ITO, WARD-3(1), 1/7236, EAST GORAKH PARK, NEW DELHI BEHIND HANUMAN MANDIR, SHAHDARA, NEW DELHI – 110 032 (PAN: AAECA7472P) (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : Mrs. Sonia Rani, CA Department by : Sh. Pradeep Singh Gautam, Sr. DR. ORDER This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order passed by the Ld. CIT(A)-I, New Delhi on 08.05.2018 in relation to the assessment year 2008-09 on the following grounds:- 1. That the Ld. CIT(A) err…

Giggle Infotech Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi vs. ITO, Ward- 10(1), New Delhi

In the result, the Appeal filed by the Assessee stands partly allowed

ITA 1284/DEL/2018[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi01 Jan 2020AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri H.S. Sidhuassessment Year : 2008-09

For Appellant: Sh. Deepak Ostwal, FCAFor Respondent: Sh. Pradeep Singh Gautam, Sr.DR
Section 132Section 139Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 68

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCHES : SMC : NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI H.S. SIDHU, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year : 2008-09 M/S GIGGLE INFOTECH PVT. Vs. ITO, WARD 10(1), LTD., NEW DELHI C/O D. OSTWAL & ASSOCIATES, 310, COMPETENT HOUSE, F-14, MIDDLE CIRCLE, CONNAUGHT PLACE, NEW DELHI – 110 001 (PAN: AACCG6898F) (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : Sh. Deepak Ostwal, FCA Department by : Sh. Pradeep Singh Gautam, Sr.DR.. ORDER This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order passed by the Ld. CIT(A)-35, New Delhi on 09.11.2017 in relation to the assessment year 2008-09 on the follo…

Tara Alloys Ltd., New Delhi vs. ITO, Ward- 16(1), New Delhi

In the result, the Appeal filed by the Assessee stands partly allowed

ITA 5407/DEL/2018[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi19 Dec 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri H.S. Sidhuassessment Year : 2007-08

For Appellant: Sh. Nippun Mittal, CAFor Respondent: Sh. Pradeep Singh Gautam, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 151Section 68

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCHE : SMC : NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI H.S. SIDHU, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year : 2007-08 TARA ALLOYS LTD., Vs. ITO, WARD 16(1), 102, HARSHA HOUSE, NEW DELHI KARAMPURA COMMERCIAL COMPLEX, NEW DELHI – 110 015 (PAN: AAACT0545N) (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : Sh. Nippun Mittal, CA Department by : Sh. Pradeep Singh Gautam, Sr. DR. ORDER This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order passed by the Ld. CIT(A)-16, New Delhi on 30.05.2018 in relation to the assessment year 2007-08 on the following grounds:- 1. On the facts and circumstances of th…

Heat Flown Electricals Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi vs. ITO, Ward- 11(2), New Delhi

In the result, the Appeal filed by the Assessee stands partly allowed

ITA 3692/DEL/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Dec 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri H.S. Sidhuassessment Year : 2010-11

For Appellant: Ms. Rano Jain, Adv. & Sh. PranshuFor Respondent: Sh. Pradeep Singh Gautam, Sr. DR
Section 147Section 148Section 68Section 69C

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCHE : SMC : NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI H.S. SIDHU, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year : 2010-11 HEAT FLOWN ELECTRICALS PVT. Vs. ITO, WARD 11(2), LTD., NEW DELHI 207, ALLIED HOUSE, 2, OLD ROHTAK ROAD, INDERLOK, NEW DELHI – 35 (PAN: AABCH0771R) (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : Ms. Rano Jain, Adv. & Sh. Pranshu Singhal, CA Department by : Sh. Pradeep Singh Gautam, Sr. DR. ORDER This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order passed by the Ld. CIT(A)-4, New Delhi on 29.03.2019 in relation to the assessment year 2010-11 on the following grounds:- 1.…

Neelam Arora, New Delhi vs. ITO, Ward-36(4), New Delhi

In the result, all the five appeals filed by the respective assesses are allowed

ITA 2689/DEL/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi17 Dec 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri H.S. Sidhui.T.A. No. 2689/Del/2019 Assessment Year: 2010-11 Neelam Arora, Vs. Ito, Ward-36(4), C/O Kapil Goel, Adv. New Delhi F-26/124, Sector-7, Rohini, Delhi – 85 (Pan: Afkpa9328J) (Assessee) (Respondent Assessee By : Shri Kapil Goel, Adv. Revenue By : Shri Pradeep Singh Gautam, Sr. Dr.

For Appellant: Shri Kapil Goel, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Pradeep Singh Gautam, Sr. DR
Section 147Section 148Section 151

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH : SMC : NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI H.S. SIDHU, JUDICIAL MEMBER I.T.A. No. 2689/Del/2019 Assessment Year: 2010-11 NEELAM ARORA, vs. ITO, WARD-36(4), C/O KAPIL GOEL, ADV. NEW DELHI F-26/124, SECTOR-7, ROHINI, DELHI – 85 (PAN: AFKPA9328J) (ASSESSEE) (RESPONDENT Assessee by : Shri Kapil Goel, Adv. Revenue by : Shri Pradeep Singh Gautam, Sr. DR. ORDER The Assessee has filed this appeal against the impugned order dated 20.11.2018 passed by the Ld. CIT(A)-12, New Delhi on the following grounds:- 1. That order passed by Ld AO dated 29/12/2017 and further order passed by ld…

Raju Verma, Dehradun vs. DCIT, Dehradun

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 1797/DEL/2017[1998-99]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Apr 2019AY 1998-99

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri O.P. Kant

Section 147Section 148Section 149

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH: “F”, NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI BHAVNESH SAINI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI O.P. KANT, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA Nos.1796 & 1797/Del/2017 Assessment Years: 1997-98 & 1998-99 Shri Raju Verma, Vs. DCIT, 17/1, Curzon Road, Central Circle, Dehradun Dehradun PAN :ABIPV8176F (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by Dr. Rakesh Gupta & Shri Somil Aggarwal. Respondent by Shri Surender Pal, Sr.DR Date of hearing 06.03.2019 Date of pronouncement 09.04.2019 ORDER PER O.P. KANT, A.M.: These two appeals by the assessee are directed against two separate orders dated 17/02/2017 passed by the…

Raju Verma, Dehradun vs. DCIT, Dehradun

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 1796/DEL/2017[1997-98]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Apr 2019AY 1997-98

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri O.P. Kant

Section 147Section 148Section 149

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH: “F”, NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI BHAVNESH SAINI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI O.P. KANT, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA Nos.1796 & 1797/Del/2017 Assessment Years: 1997-98 & 1998-99 Shri Raju Verma, Vs. DCIT, 17/1, Curzon Road, Central Circle, Dehradun Dehradun PAN :ABIPV8176F (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by Dr. Rakesh Gupta & Shri Somil Aggarwal. Respondent by Shri Surender Pal, Sr.DR Date of hearing 06.03.2019 Date of pronouncement 09.04.2019 ORDER PER O.P. KANT, A.M.: These two appeals by the assessee are directed against two separate orders dated 17/02/2017 passed by the…