319 ITR 393 (Chhattisgarh) (x) CIT v. Misra Preservers (P.) Ltd.

31 Taxmann.com 214High Court2013#24412 most cited

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,339 Indian tax judgments — from 2018 to 2022.

Judgments citing 319 ITR 393 (Chhattisgarh) (x) CIT v. Misra Preservers (P.) Ltd.

The ITO, Ward-1(1)(2), Vadodara vs. M/S. Dukraft Paper Distributor Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai

ITA 452/AHD/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad27 Apr 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Pramod M. Jagtap & Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: Shri S. S. Shukla, Sr. DRFor Respondent: Shri M. K. Patel, A.R

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 68

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH, AHMEDABAD BEFORE SHRI PRAMOD M. JAGTAP, VICE PRESIDENT & Ms. MADHUMITA ROY, JUDICIAL MEMBER I.T.A. No. 452/Ahd/2016 (Assessment Year: 2012-13) ITO Vs. M/s. Dukraft Paper Ward-1(1)(2), Distributor Pvt. Ltd. 107, 1st Floor, City Mall, Vadodara-390007 New Link Road, Andheri West Mumbai-400053 [PAN No.AADCD0768Q] (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Appellant by : Shri S. S. Shukla, Sr. DR Respondent by : Shri M. K. Patel, A.R. Date of Hearing 31.03.2022 Date of Pronouncement 27.04.2022 O R D E R PER MADHUMITA ROY, JM: The instant appeal filed by the Revenue is directed agai…

ITO, New Delhi vs. M/S Blisswood Green Infrastructure and Developers Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi

In the result, the appeal is dismissed

ITA 5120/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi15 Feb 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: : Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri L.P. Sahuassessment Year: 2012-13

Section 133(6)Section 68

…In the Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench ‘A’, New Delhi Before : Shri Bhavnesh Saini, Judicial Member And Shri L.P. Sahu, Accountant Member Assessment Year: 2012-13 Income-tax Officer, vs. Blisswood Green Infrastructure Ward 5(1), New Delhi. and Developers Pvt. Ltd., 289-Chhatarpur Pahari Road, New Delhi. PAN – AADCB 2384A (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by Sh. Amit Katoch, Sr. DR Respondent by S/Sh. D.C. Agarwal, R.N. Poonia, AR Sh. Sudesh Garg, Advocate Date of Hearing 04.02.2019 Date of Pronouncement 15.02.2019 ORDER Per L.P. Sahu, A.M.: This appeal by the Revenue is directed against the order…

DCIT 9(3)(1), Mumbai vs. Fern Infrastructure P.Ltd, Mumbai

ITA 3390/MUM/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai31 May 2018AY 2010-11

For Appellant: Shri Vijay MehtaFor Respondent: Shri Saurabh Deshpande

Section 131(1)Section 133Section 68

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण “के” "यायपीठ मुंबई म"। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “K” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI SHAMIM YAHYA, AM AND SHRI RAVISH SOOD, JM आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 3390/Mum/2016 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2010-11) Dy. CIT-9(3)(1), M/s. Fern Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. बनाम/ 215, Aayakar Bhavan, 2nd Floor, 6th Floor, Akurti Trade Centre, M. K. Marg, Mumbai-400 020 Road No. 7, Marol, MIDC, Vs. Andheri (E), Mumbai-400 093 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./PAN/GIR No. AABCF 2322 C (Revenue) : (Assessee) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 3141/Mum/2016 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2010-11) बनाम/ M/s. Fern Infrastructur…