2nd September, 2015 (SC). (ii) CIT, Delhi v. SMC Share Brokers Ltd.

159 Taxmann 306High Court2007#2367 most cited

What is 2nd September, 2015 (SC). (ii) CIT, Delhi v. SMC Share Brokers Ltd. authority for?

The court considers statements made by an assessee regarding unrecorded cash receipts utilized for business expenses as reflecting unexplained or unaccounted work in progress.

49

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,005 Indian tax judgments — from 2016 to 2025.

Also referred to as

SMC Share Brokers Ltd. · section 68 · unaccounted cash · unrecorded receipts · business expenses · work in progress · unexplained income · cash credit · assessment

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing 2nd September, 2015 (SC). (ii) CIT, Delhi v. SMC Share Brokers Ltd.

Marina Ship Brokers, Chennai vs. ITO Non Corporate Ward 11(2), Chennai

The appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1956/CHNY/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai27 Sept 2017AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri A. Mohan Alankamonyआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.1956/Mds/2017 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2013-14 M/S Marina Ship Brokers, M/S Raghunath & Assosicates, The Income Tax Officer, Advocates, V. Non-Corporate Ward 11(2), 2Nd Floor, Lakshmi Building, Chennai. Kannur Road, Calicut-673 001. Kerala. Pan : Aatfm 7860 M (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri P. Raghunathan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. S. Vijayaprabha, JCIT
Section 35(1)(ii)

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, ’डी’ "यायपीठ, चे"नई IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘D’ BENCH, CHENNAI "ी एन.आर.एस. गणेशन, "या"यक सद"य एवं "ी ए. मोहन अलंकामणी, लेखा सद"य केसम" BEFORE SHRI N.R.S. GANESAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI A. MOHAN ALANKAMONY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ITA No.1956/Mds/2017 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2013-14 M/s Marina Ship Brokers, M/s Raghunath & Assosicates, The Income Tax Officer, Advocates, v. Non-Corporate Ward 11(2), 2nd floor, Lakshmi Building, Chennai. Kannur Road, Calicut-673 001. Kerala. PAN : AATFM 7860 M (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/Appellant…

ITO, New Delhi vs. M/S. Prakash Colour (P) Ltd., New Delhi

In the result, the appeal of the department is dismissed

ITA 1176/DEL/2011[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi16 Dec 2016AY 2007-08

Bench: Sh. N. K. Saini, Am & Smt. Beena Pillai, Jm Ita No. 1176/Del/2011 : Asstt. Year : 2007-08 Income Tax Officer, Vs M/S Prakash Colour (P) Ltd., 15A, 2Nd Floor, Sri Nagar Colony, Ward-14(3), New Delhi Near Bharat Nagar, New Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaacp5463B Assessee By : Sh. Ved Jain, Adv., Sh. Ashish Chadha & P. Srivastava, Cas Revenue By : Sh. F. R. Meena, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing : 29.09.2016 Date Of Pronouncement : 16.12.2016 Order Per N. K. Saini, Am: This Is An Appeal By The Department Against The Order Dated 01.12.2010 Of Ld. Cit(A)-Xvii, New Delhi.

For Appellant: Sh. Ved Jain, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. F. R. Meena, Sr. DR
Section 132Section 143(1)

….08.2016 " Andaman Timber Industries Vs CCE in Civil Appeal No. 4228 of 2006 dated 02.09.2015 " Prakash Chand Nahata Vs Union of India 163 CTR 310 (SC) " Kishan Chand Chellaram Vs CIT 125 ITR 713 (SC) 24 Prakash Colour (P) Ltd. " Alok Aggarwal Vs DCIT (2000) 67 TTJ 109 (Del.) 11. We have considered the submissions of both the parties and carefully gone through the material available on the record. In the present case, it is noticed that the AO made the impugned addition on the basis of statement of Mr. Tarun Goyal, recorded by the Investigation Wing but the opportunity to cross-examine Mr. Tarun Goyal was not pr…