294 (SC) 3. CIT, Central Circle v. D.G. Gopala. Gowda

68 Taxmann.com 148High Court2016#18501 most cited
5

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 348,356 Indian tax judgments — from 2016 to 2025.

Judgments citing 294 (SC) 3. CIT, Central Circle v. D.G. Gopala. Gowda

M/S. Coretech Ventures (Bangalore) Private Limited, Bangalore vs. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Bengaluru-2, Bangalore

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands dismissed

ITA 746/BANG/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore29 Jul 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri. Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillaiassessment Year : 2016-17 M/S. Coretech Ventures (Bangalore) Pvt. Ltd., The Principal Divyasree Chambers’ Commissioner Of Wing-A, O Shaugnessy Income Tax, Road, Bengaluru – 2, Langford Town, Vs. Bengaluru. Bangalore – 560 025. Pan: Aafcc2775E Appellant Respondent : Shri V. Chandrashekar, Assessee By Advocate : Shri V.S. Chakrapani, Cit- Revenue By Dr Date Of Hearing : 01-06-2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 29-07-2022 Order Per Beena Pillaipresent Appeal Is Filed By Assessee Against Order Dated 30/03/2021 Passed By Ld.Pcit, Bangalore -2 U/S. 263 Of The Act For A.Y. 2016-17 On Following Grounds Of Appeal: “1. The Order Of Revision Passed By The Learned Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Bengaluru -2, Bengaluru, Under Section 263 Of The Act Dated 30/03/2021, In So Far As It Is Against The Appellant Is Opposed To Law, Weight Of Evidence, Probabilities, Facts & Circumstances Of The Appellant'S Case.

For Respondent: Shri V. Chandrashekar
Section 143Section 263Section 80Section 801A

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘C’ BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI. CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SMT. BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year : 2016-17 M/s. Coretech Ventures (Bangalore) Pvt. Ltd., The Principal Divyasree Chambers’ Commissioner of Wing-A, O Shaugnessy Income Tax, Road, Bengaluru – 2, Langford Town, Vs. Bengaluru. Bangalore – 560 025. PAN: AAFCC2775E APPELLANT RESPONDENT : Shri V. Chandrashekar, Assessee by Advocate : Shri V.S. Chakrapani, CIT- Revenue by DR Date of Hearing : 01-06-2022 Date of Pronouncement : 29-07-2022 ORDER PER BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER Present appeal is…

ACIT 1(3)(1), Mumbai vs. Reliance Money Infrastructure Ltd, Mumbai

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2300/MUM/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai18 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadaleacit 1(3)(1) Vs. Reliance Money Rm No. 540, 5Th Floor, Infrastructure Ltd., Aayakar Bhavan, Mk 7Th Floor, B Wing, Road, Mumbai. Trade World, Kamla Mills Compound, Sb Marg Lower Parel, Mumbai - 400013 Pan/Gir No. : Aadcr2730G Appellant .. Respondent Appellant By : Shri Bharat Andhale, Dr Respondent By : Shri Jitendra Sanghavi, Ar Date Of Hearing 28.01.2021 Date Of Pronouncement 18.03.2021 आदेश / O R D E R Per Pavan Kumar Gadale Jm: The Appeal Is Filed By The Revenue Against The Order Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) -3, Mumbai, Passed U/S. 143(3) R.W.S 263 & 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961. The Revenue Has Raised The Following Grounds:

For Appellant: Shri Bharat Andhale, DRFor Respondent: Shri Jitendra Sanghavi, AR
Section 143(3)Section 260ASection 263Section 27Section 271(1)(c)Section 35D

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “D” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & SHRI PAVAN KUMAR GADALE, JUDICIAL MEMBER ACIT 1(3)(1) Vs. Reliance Money Rm No. 540, 5th Floor, Infrastructure Ltd., Aayakar Bhavan, MK 7th Floor, B Wing, Road, Mumbai. Trade World, Kamla Mills Compound, SB Marg Lower Parel, Mumbai - 400013 PAN/GIR No. : AADCR2730G Appellant .. Respondent Appellant by : Shri Bharat Andhale, DR Respondent by : Shri Jitendra Sanghavi, AR Date of Hearing 28.01.2021 Date of Pronouncement 18.03.2021 आदेश / O R D E R PER PAVAN KUMAR GADALE JM: The appeal is filed by the revenue aga…

294 (SC) 3. CIT, Central Circle v. D.G. Gopala. Gowda (68 Taxmann.com 148) — Cited in 5 Judgments | BharatTax