288), Pr.CIT v. Best Infrastructure (I) Pvt Ltd (

241 Taxmann 199High Court2016#678 most cited

What is 288), Pr.CIT v. Best Infrastructure (I) Pvt Ltd ( authority for?

Statements recorded under Section 132(4) cannot alone constitute incriminating material to justify additions in unabated assessments. Corroboration is generally required for such statements to form the sole basis of additions.

147

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,470 Indian tax judgments — from 2017 to 2026.

Also referred to as

Pr.CIT v. Best Infrastructure (I) Pvt Ltd · 241 Taxmann 199 · Section 132(4) statement · incriminating material · unabated assessments · additions in search assessment · statement alone · search and seizure assessment · Section 153A · corroboration of statement · income surrender · Best Infrastructure

Sections most often in play

Section 143(3)Section 132(4)Section 132Section 69ASection 147Section 131Section 153ASection 37(1)

Issues it is cited on

section 158b(b)section 158bb(1)section 153(a)section 158bbaccumulated profitsgaarretracted statementsection 2(22)deemed dividendsection 2(22)(e)section 142asurrender of income

Judgments citing 288), Pr.CIT v. Best Infrastructure (I) Pvt Ltd (

Sanjeev Aggarwal, Chandigarh vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-1, Chandigarh

ITA 489/CHANDI/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh03 Mar 2025AY 2017-18
Section 127Section 132Section 153ASection 153D

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण, चंडीगढ़ पीठ, चंडीगढ़ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DIVISION BENCH, ‘B’ CHANDIGARH BEFORE SHRI SANJAY GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI KRINWANT SAHAY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ITA No. 579/CHD /2023 निर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Year : 2017-18 & आयकर अपील सं./ITA Nos.582 to 584/CHD/ 2023 निर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Years : 2014-15 to 2016-17 & आयकर अपील सं./ITA No. 591/CHD /2023 निर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Year : 2018-19 Maxport India Pvt. Ltd. C/o Parikshit Aggarwal, Chartered Accountant, H. No. 3035, Sector 27D, Chandigarh- 160019. बनाम Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Centre Circle-1,…

Sanjeev Aggarwal, Chandigarh vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-1, Chandigarh

ITA 480/CHANDI/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh03 Mar 2025AY 2018-19
Section 127Section 132Section 153ASection 153DSection 2(22)(e)

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण, चंडीगढ न्यायपीठ, चंडीगढ़ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DIVISION BENCH, ‘B’ CHANDIGARH BEFORE SHRI SANJAY GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI KRINWANT SAHAY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकरअपीलसं./ITA No. 579/CHD/2023 निर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Year : 2017-18 & आयकरअपीलसं./ITA Nos.582 to 584/CHD/2023 निर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Years : 2014-15 to 2016-17 & आयकरअपीलसं./ITA No. 591/CHD/2023 निर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Year : 2018-19 Maxport India Pvt. Ltd. C/o Parikshit Aggarwal, Chartered Accountant, H. No. 3035, Sector 27D, Chandigarh- 160019. बनाम Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Centre Circle-1, Chan…

Kuber Grains & Spices Pvt. Ltd., Delhi vs. ACIT, Central Circle-30, New Delhi

In the result appeal of assessee vide ITR Nos

ITA 2711/DEL/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi03 Mar 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Anubhav Sharma & Shri Amitabh Shukla

For Appellant: Shri Rajiv Khandelwal, CA &For Respondent: Shri Dayainder Singh Sidhu, CIT(DR)
Section 132Section 68

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (DELHI BENCH: ‘C’: NEW DELHI) BEFORE SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI AMITABH SHUKLA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No:- 320/Del/2019 (Assessment Year- 2015-16) Kuber Khadyann Pvt. Ltd., ACIT, 1/8, West Patel Nagar, Vs. Central Circle-30, Delhi-110008. New Delhi-110055. PAN No: AABCK0600L APPELLANT RESPONDENT Assessee by : Shri Rajiv Khandelwal, CA & Shri Gagan Khandelwal, Adv. & Shri Jaind Kumar, Adv. Revenue by : Shri Dayainder Singh Sidhu, CIT(DR) Date of Hearing :06.03.2025 ITA No:- 1407 /Del/2022 (Assessment Year- 2015-16) Kuber Grains & Spices Pvt. Ltd., AC…

M/S. Mukka Proteins Limited (Formerly Know As Mukka Sea Food Industries Ltd., Mangalore vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-1, Mangaluru

In the result, appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 431/BANG/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore03 Jul 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri Keshav Dubey

For Appellant: Sri Narendra Sharma, A.RFor Respondent: Ms. Neera Malhotra, D.R
Section 132Section 132(4)Section 153ASection 153DSection 234A

…ITA Nos.431 to 435/Bang/2024 M/s. Mukka Proteins Limited, Mangaluru IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C’’ BENCH: BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI KESHAV DUBEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA Nos.431 to 435/Bang/2024 Assessment Years: 2013-14 to 2017-18 M/s. Mukka Proteins Limited (Formerly known as Mukka Sea Food Industries Ltd.), # 18-2-16/4, DCIT Mukka Corporate House, First Cross Central Circle-1 Vs. N.G. Road, Attavar Mangaluru Mangaluru 575 001 Karnataka PAN NO : AAGCM8310E APPELLANT RESPONDENT Appellant by : Sri Narendra Sharma, A.R. Respondent by : Ms. Neera Malhotra, D.R.…

Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-3(3), Mumbai vs. Avaada Ventures Private Limited, Mumbai

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed as well as Cross Objections of the assessee are dismissed as infructuous

ITA 4342/MUM/2023[2017]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai05 Apr 2024

Bench: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA (Judicial Member), SHRI S RIFAUR RAHMAN (Accountant Member)

Section 132Section 132(4)Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 153A

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ‘A‘ BENCH MUMBAI BEFORE: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI S RIFAUR RAHMAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No.2750/Mum/2023 (Assessment Year :2014-15) & DCIT, Central Circle-3(3) Vs. M/s. Avaada Ventures Mumbai Pvt. Ltd. Room No.1923, 406, 4th Floor, Hubtown 19th Floor Solaris Building Air India Building N S Phadke Road Mumbai – 400 021 Andheri East Mumbai – 400 069 PAN/GIR No.AAKCS9700L (Appellant) .. (Respondent) CO No.7/Mum/2024 (Arising out of ITA No.2749/Mum/2023) (Assessment Year :2013-14) & CO No.6/Mum/2024 (Arising out of ITA No.2750/Mum/2023) (Assessment Year :2014-…

DCIT, Central Circle- 3(3), Mumbai vs. Avaada Ventures Pvt. Ltd, Mumbai

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are

ITA 2749/MUM/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai05 Apr 2024AY 2013-14
Section 132Section 132(4)Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 153A

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ‘A’ BENCH MUMBAI BEFORE: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI S RIFAUR RAHMAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No.2749/Mum/2023 (Assessment Year :2013-14) ITA No.2750/Mum/2023 (Assessment Year :2014-15) ITA No.3613/Mum/2023 (Assessment Year :2016-17) & ITA No.4342/Mum/2023 (Assessment Year :2017-18) DCIT, Central Circle-3(3) Vs. M/s. Avaada Ventures Mumbai Pvt. Ltd. Room No.1923, 406, 4th Floor, Hubtown 19th Floor Solaris Building Air India Building N S Phadke Road Mumbai - 400 021 Andheri East Mumbai - 400 069 (Appellant) (Respondent) PAN/GIR No.AAKCS9700L CO No.7/Mum/2024 (Arisin…

ACIT Central Circle-30, New Delhi vs. Kamana Industries Pvt Ltd, Sonipat

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 4997/DEL/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Jul 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Shri M. Balaganeshassessment Year: 2013-14 Acit, Vs Kamana Industries Pvt. Ltd., Central Circle-30, Piau Maniyari, New Delhi. Narela Road, Kundli, Sonepat, Haryana – 131 028. Pan Aabck7580K (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri P.C. Yadav & Shri Shivam Garg, Advocate Revenue By : Ms Sapna Bhatia, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing : 01.05.2023 Date Of Pronouncement : 27.07.2023 Order Per M. Balaganesh, Am: This Appeal In Ita No.4997/Del/2019 For Ay 2013-14 Arises Out Of The Order Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Appeals)-30, New Delhi, In Appeal No.172/16- 17/2606 Dated 13.03.2019 [Hereinafter Referred To As ‘Ld. Cit(A)’, In Short] Against The Order Of Assessment Passed U/S 153A Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As ‘The Act’) Dated 29.12.2016 By The Ld. Income-Tax Officer, Central Circle-30, New Delhi (Hereinafter Referred To As ‘Ld. Ao’). 2. The Only Issue To Be Decided In This Appeal Is As To Whether The Ld.Cit(A) Was Justified In Deleting The Addition Made On Account Of Share Capital Received By The Assessee In The Sum Of Rs.7,10,00,000/- In The Facts & Circumstances Of The Instant Case.

For Appellant: Shri P.C. Yadav &For Respondent: Ms Sapna Bhatia, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 132(4)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 153ASection 68

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH : H : DELHI BEFORE SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI M. BALAGANESH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Year: 2013-14 ACIT, Vs Kamana Industries Pvt. Ltd., Central Circle-30, Piau Maniyari, New Delhi. Narela Road, Kundli, Sonepat, Haryana – 131 028. PAN AABCK7580K (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri P.C. Yadav & Shri Shivam Garg, Advocate Revenue by : Ms Sapna Bhatia, CIT-DR Date of Hearing : 01.05.2023 Date of Pronouncement : 27.07.2023 ORDER PER M. BALAGANESH, AM: This appeal in ITA No.4997/Del/2019 for AY 2013-14 arises out of the order of the Commi…

Sri Raja Reddy Nalla, Warangal vs. ACIT, Central Circle-1(3), Hyderabad

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 519/HYD/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad25 Apr 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Sri K.C.DevdasFor Respondent: Sri K.P.R.R. Murthy
Section 115BSection 132Section 153ASection 271ASection 69

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL Hyderabad ‘A’ Bench, Hyderabad Before Shri Rama Kanta Panda, Accountant Member AND Shri Laliet Kumar, Judicial Member ITA.No.519/Hyd/2022 Assessment Year: 2017-18 Raja Reddy Nalla, Vs. The Deputy Commissioner Warangal. of Income Tax, Central Circle 1(3), PAN : AAXPN3602Q. Hyderabad. (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by: Sri K.C.Devdas. Revenue by: Sri K.P.R.R. Murthy. Date of hearing: 19.04.2023 Date of pronouncement: 25.04.2023 O R D E R PER LALIET KUMAR, J.M. This appeal is filed by the assessee, feeling aggrieved by the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) – 11…

DCIT, CC-7(3), Mumbai vs. Satish Jagannath Aggarwal, Mumbai

In the result, the appeal of the revenue stand dismissed

ITA 2818/MUM/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Apr 2023AY 2014-15
For Appellant: Rushabh MehtaFor Respondent: Krishna Kumar
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153Section 153ASection 153CSection 158B

…P a g e | 1 DCIT, CC-6(3) Vs. Satish Jagannath Aggarwal IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “G” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI ABY T VARKEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Deputy Commissioner of Vs. Satish Jagannath Income Tax, CC-6(3) Aggarwal, Room No. 655, Aaykar Jagan Kutir Sher E Bhavan, M.K. Road, Punjab, Mahakali Caves Mumbai – 400020 Road, Andheri (East) Mumbai – 400093 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./PAN/GIR No: AADPA6712G Appellant .. Respondent Appellant by : Rushabh Mehta Respondent by : Krishna Kumar Date of Hearing 10.04.2023 Date of Pronouncement 20.04.2023 आदेश / O R D E R Per…

M/S Sahaj Ankur Developers, Mumbai vs. Dy CIT 3 (4), Mumbai

In the result, the appeals of the assessee for AYs 2011-12 & 2012-13 are allowed and the appeal of the assessee for AY 2013-14 is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 332/MUM/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai31 Jan 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Baskaran Br, Am & Shri Aby Tvarkey, Am आयकरअपीलसं/ I.T.A. No.330/Mum/2020 (निर्धारणवर्ा / Assessment Year: 2011-12) & आयकरअपीलसं/ I.T.A. No.331/Mum/2020 (निर्धारणवर्ा / Assessment Year: 2012-13) & आयकरअपीलसं/ I.T.A. No.332/Mum/2020 (निर्धारणवर्ा / Assessment Year: 2013-14) Sahaj Ankur Developers बिधम/ Dcit-Cc, 3(4) B-301, Sorrento Building 19Th Floor, Air India Vs. Besant Road, Santcruz (W) Building, Nariman Point, Mumbai-400021. Mumbai-400054. स्थधयीलेखधसं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. : Aawfs2944L (अपीलार्थी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Bharat KumarFor Respondent: Dr Manoj Kumar (DR)
Section 132(4)Section 139Section 143(2)Section 153A

…constitutes incriminating material to justify additions in unabated assessments. The Ld. CIT, DR further contended that, the decisions relied upon by the assessee in the case of Pr.CIT Vs Best Infrastructure (I) Pvt Ltd (397 ITR 82), CIT Vs Harjeev Aggarwal (241 Taxmann 199), amongst others, wherein it was held that statements recorded u/s 132(4) cannot alone constitute incriminating material to justify addition in unabated assessments, were distinguishable on facts from the present case. According to him, since the statement of one of the Partner, Shri Sunil Shah was also corroborated by the statements of entry…

M/S Sahaj Ankur Developers, Mumbai vs. Dy CIT 3 (4), Mumbai

In the result, the appeals of the assessee for AYs 2011-12 & 2012-13 are allowed and the appeal of the assessee for AY 2013-14 is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 331/MUM/2020[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai31 Jan 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Baskaran Br, Am & Shri Aby Tvarkey, Am आयकरअपीलसं/ I.T.A. No.330/Mum/2020 (निर्धारणवर्ा / Assessment Year: 2011-12) & आयकरअपीलसं/ I.T.A. No.331/Mum/2020 (निर्धारणवर्ा / Assessment Year: 2012-13) & आयकरअपीलसं/ I.T.A. No.332/Mum/2020 (निर्धारणवर्ा / Assessment Year: 2013-14) Sahaj Ankur Developers बिधम/ Dcit-Cc, 3(4) B-301, Sorrento Building 19Th Floor, Air India Vs. Besant Road, Santcruz (W) Building, Nariman Point, Mumbai-400021. Mumbai-400054. स्थधयीलेखधसं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. : Aawfs2944L (अपीलार्थी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Bharat KumarFor Respondent: Dr Manoj Kumar (DR)
Section 132(4)Section 139Section 143(2)Section 153A

…constitutes incriminating material to justify additions in unabated assessments. The Ld. CIT, DR further contended that, the decisions relied upon by the assessee in the case of Pr.CIT Vs Best Infrastructure (I) Pvt Ltd (397 ITR 82), CIT Vs Harjeev Aggarwal (241 Taxmann 199), amongst others, wherein it was held that statements recorded u/s 132(4) cannot alone constitute incriminating material to justify addition in unabated assessments, were distinguishable on facts from the present case. According to him, since the statement of one of the Partner, Shri Sunil Shah was also corroborated by the statements of entry…

M/S Sahaj Ankur Developers, Mumbai vs. Dy CIT 3 (4), Mumbai

In the result, the appeals of the assessee for AYs 2011-12 & 2012-13 are allowed and the appeal of the assessee for AY 2013-14 is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 330/MUM/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai31 Jan 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Baskaran Br, Am & Shri Aby Tvarkey, Am आयकरअपीलसं/ I.T.A. No.330/Mum/2020 (निर्धारणवर्ा / Assessment Year: 2011-12) & आयकरअपीलसं/ I.T.A. No.331/Mum/2020 (निर्धारणवर्ा / Assessment Year: 2012-13) & आयकरअपीलसं/ I.T.A. No.332/Mum/2020 (निर्धारणवर्ा / Assessment Year: 2013-14) Sahaj Ankur Developers बिधम/ Dcit-Cc, 3(4) B-301, Sorrento Building 19Th Floor, Air India Vs. Besant Road, Santcruz (W) Building, Nariman Point, Mumbai-400021. Mumbai-400054. स्थधयीलेखधसं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. : Aawfs2944L (अपीलार्थी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Bharat KumarFor Respondent: Dr Manoj Kumar (DR)
Section 132(4)Section 139Section 143(2)Section 153A

…constitutes incriminating material to justify additions in unabated assessments. The Ld. CIT, DR further contended that, the decisions relied upon by the assessee in the case of Pr.CIT Vs Best Infrastructure (I) Pvt Ltd (397 ITR 82), CIT Vs Harjeev Aggarwal (241 Taxmann 199), amongst others, wherein it was held that statements recorded u/s 132(4) cannot alone constitute incriminating material to justify addition in unabated assessments, were distinguishable on facts from the present case. According to him, since the statement of one of the Partner, Shri Sunil Shah was also corroborated by the statements of entry…

DCIT, Central Circle- 30, New Delhi vs. Kuber Khaini Pvt. Ltd., Delhi

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue in ITA Nos

ITA 738/DEL/2021[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi25 Nov 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri N.K. Billaiya & Shri Kul Bharat

For Appellant: Shri P.C. Yadav, AdvFor Respondent: Shri K.M. Mahesh, CIT- DR
Section 132Section 132(4)Section 143Section 153Section 68

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI ‘C’ BENCH, NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI N.K. BILLAIYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER, AND SHRI KUL BHARAT, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No. 736/DEL/2021 [A.Y 2012-13] The D.C.I.T Vs. M/s Kuber Khadyan Pvt Ltd Central Circle - 30 1/8 West Patel Nagar New Delhi New Delhi PAN: AABCK 0600 L ITA No. 738/DEL/2021 [A.Y 2013-14] The D.C.I.T Vs. M/s Kuber Khaini Pvt Ltd Central Circle - 30 32 K, Siraspur, Godown No. 6 New Delhi G.T. Karnal Road, Siraspur Delhi PAN: AABCK 0469 M (Applicant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri P.C. Yadav, Adv. Department By : Shri K.M. Mahesh, CIT- DR Date of Hea…

DCIT, Central Circle- 30, New Delhi vs. Kuber Khadyan Pvt. Ltd., New Dlehi

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue in ITA Nos

ITA 736/DEL/2021[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi25 Nov 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri N.K. Billaiya & Shri Kul Bharat

For Appellant: Shri P.C. Yadav, AdvFor Respondent: Shri K.M. Mahesh, CIT- DR
Section 132Section 132(4)Section 143Section 153Section 68

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI ‘C’ BENCH, NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI N.K. BILLAIYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER, AND SHRI KUL BHARAT, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No. 736/DEL/2021 [A.Y 2012-13] The D.C.I.T Vs. M/s Kuber Khadyan Pvt Ltd Central Circle - 30 1/8 West Patel Nagar New Delhi New Delhi PAN: AABCK 0600 L ITA No. 738/DEL/2021 [A.Y 2013-14] The D.C.I.T Vs. M/s Kuber Khaini Pvt Ltd Central Circle - 30 32 K, Siraspur, Godown No. 6 New Delhi G.T. Karnal Road, Siraspur Delhi PAN: AABCK 0469 M (Applicant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri P.C. Yadav, Adv. Department By : Shri K.M. Mahesh, CIT- DR Date of Hea…

DCIT CC -7(2), Mumbai vs. M/S. Dewal Engineering Pvt. Ltd, Mumbai

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 2268/MUM/2021[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai14 Nov 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Aby T Varkey () & Shri Amarjit Singh ()

Section 132Section 132(4)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153CSection 153C(1)Section 68

…1 ITA 2268/Mum/2021 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH “D”, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI ABY T VARKEY (JUDICIAL MEMBER) AND SHRI AMARJIT SINGH (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) ITA 2268/Mum/2021 (Assessment year 2011-12) Dy. Commissioner of Income-tax vs M/s Dewal Engineering Pvt Ltd 304/305, 3rd Floor, Near Lokmanya Central Circle-7(2), Mumbai Room No.655, Aayakar Bhavan Tilak Road, Mahatma Phule Road, M.K. Road, Mumbai Next to Prasant Hotel, Shree Heramb CHS, Mulund East, Mumbai-400 081 PAN : AAACD2031R APPELLANT RESPONDENT Assessee represented by Shri Rajiv Khandelwal Department represented by Smt. Riddhi Mishra D…

DCIT CC-7(2), Mumbaia vs. M/S. Dadashree Remedies Pvt. Ltd, Mumbai

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 2184/MUM/2021[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Sept 2022AY 2009-10
Section 132Section 132(4)Section 133(6)Section 153ASection 68

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ‘D‘ BENCH MUMBAI BEFORE: SHRI M.BALAGANESH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & SHRI PAVAN KUMAR GADALE, JUDICIAL MEMBER Dy. Commissioner of Vs. M/s. Dadashree Remedies Income Tax, CC-7(2) Pvt. Ltd., Room No.655, Aayakar 312, Narshi Natha Street Bhavan, M.K.Road, Masjid Bunder Mumbai – 400 020 Mumbai – 400 009 PAN/GIR No.AAKCS4863Q (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Assessee by Ms. Poojan Mehta Revenue by Mr. Chetan Kacha Date of Hearing 26/08/2022 Date of Pronouncement 28/09/2022 आदेश / O R D E R PER M. BALAGANESH (A.M): This appeal in ITA No.2184/Mum/2021 for A.Y.2009-10 arises out of th…

Micro Ankur Developers, Mumbai vs. DCIT - CC - 3(4), Mumbai

In the result, the appeals of the assessee for AYs 2010-11, 2011-12 & 2012-

ITA 1050/MUM/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai02 Sept 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey, Jm & Shri Gagan Goyal, Am आयकरअपीलसं/ I.T.A. No.1046/Mum/2019 (निर्धारणवर्ा / Assessment Year: 2010-11) & आयकरअपीलसं/ I.T.A. No.1047/Mum/2019 (निर्धारणवर्ा / Assessment Year: 2011-12) & आयकरअपीलसं/ I.T.A. No.1048/Mum/2019 (निर्धारणवर्ा / Assessment Year: 2012-13) & आयकरअपीलसं/ I.T.A. No.1049/Mum/2019 (निर्धारणवर्ा / Assessment Year: 2013-14) & आयकरअपीलसं/ I.T.A. No.1050/Mum/2019 (निर्धारणवर्ा / Assessment Year: 2014-15) Micro Ankur Developers बिधम/ Dcit-Cc, 3(4) C/O Rajendra & Associates 19Th Floor, Air India Vs. 317, Prasad Chamber, Opera Building, Nariman Point, Mumbai-400021. House, Charni Road, Mumbai-400004. स्थधयीलेखधसं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. : Aanfm4634P (अपीलार्थी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Bharat KumarFor Respondent: Dr. Mahesh Akhade (DR)
Section 132(4)Section 139Section 143(2)Section 153A

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “B” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI ABY T. VARKEY, JM AND SHRI GAGAN GOYAL, AM आयकरअपीलसं/ I.T.A. No.1046/Mum/2019 (निर्धारणवर्ा / Assessment Year: 2010-11) & आयकरअपीलसं/ I.T.A. No.1047/Mum/2019 (निर्धारणवर्ा / Assessment Year: 2011-12) & आयकरअपीलसं/ I.T.A. No.1048/Mum/2019 (निर्धारणवर्ा / Assessment Year: 2012-13) & आयकरअपीलसं/ I.T.A. No.1049/Mum/2019 (निर्धारणवर्ा / Assessment Year: 2013-14) & आयकरअपीलसं/ I.T.A. No.1050/Mum/2019 (निर्धारणवर्ा / Assessment Year: 2014-15) Micro Ankur Developers बिधम/ DCIT-CC, 3(4) C/o Rajendra & Associates 19th Floor, Air India Vs. 317, Prasad Chamb…

Micro Ankur Developers, Mumbai vs. DCIT - CC - 3(4), Mumbai

In the result, the appeals of the assessee for AYs 2010-11, 2011-12 & 2012-

ITA 1049/MUM/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai02 Sept 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey, Jm & Shri Gagan Goyal, Am आयकरअपीलसं/ I.T.A. No.1046/Mum/2019 (निर्धारणवर्ा / Assessment Year: 2010-11) & आयकरअपीलसं/ I.T.A. No.1047/Mum/2019 (निर्धारणवर्ा / Assessment Year: 2011-12) & आयकरअपीलसं/ I.T.A. No.1048/Mum/2019 (निर्धारणवर्ा / Assessment Year: 2012-13) & आयकरअपीलसं/ I.T.A. No.1049/Mum/2019 (निर्धारणवर्ा / Assessment Year: 2013-14) & आयकरअपीलसं/ I.T.A. No.1050/Mum/2019 (निर्धारणवर्ा / Assessment Year: 2014-15) Micro Ankur Developers बिधम/ Dcit-Cc, 3(4) C/O Rajendra & Associates 19Th Floor, Air India Vs. 317, Prasad Chamber, Opera Building, Nariman Point, Mumbai-400021. House, Charni Road, Mumbai-400004. स्थधयीलेखधसं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. : Aanfm4634P (अपीलार्थी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Bharat KumarFor Respondent: Dr. Mahesh Akhade (DR)
Section 132(4)Section 139Section 143(2)Section 153A

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “B” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI ABY T. VARKEY, JM AND SHRI GAGAN GOYAL, AM आयकरअपीलसं/ I.T.A. No.1046/Mum/2019 (निर्धारणवर्ा / Assessment Year: 2010-11) & आयकरअपीलसं/ I.T.A. No.1047/Mum/2019 (निर्धारणवर्ा / Assessment Year: 2011-12) & आयकरअपीलसं/ I.T.A. No.1048/Mum/2019 (निर्धारणवर्ा / Assessment Year: 2012-13) & आयकरअपीलसं/ I.T.A. No.1049/Mum/2019 (निर्धारणवर्ा / Assessment Year: 2013-14) & आयकरअपीलसं/ I.T.A. No.1050/Mum/2019 (निर्धारणवर्ा / Assessment Year: 2014-15) Micro Ankur Developers बिधम/ DCIT-CC, 3(4) C/o Rajendra & Associates 19th Floor, Air India Vs. 317, Prasad Chamb…

Micro Ankur Developers, Mumbai vs. DCIT - CC - 3(4), Mumbai

In the result, the appeals of the assessee for AYs 2010-11, 2011-12 & 2012-

ITA 1048/MUM/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai02 Sept 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey, Jm & Shri Gagan Goyal, Am आयकरअपीलसं/ I.T.A. No.1046/Mum/2019 (निर्धारणवर्ा / Assessment Year: 2010-11) & आयकरअपीलसं/ I.T.A. No.1047/Mum/2019 (निर्धारणवर्ा / Assessment Year: 2011-12) & आयकरअपीलसं/ I.T.A. No.1048/Mum/2019 (निर्धारणवर्ा / Assessment Year: 2012-13) & आयकरअपीलसं/ I.T.A. No.1049/Mum/2019 (निर्धारणवर्ा / Assessment Year: 2013-14) & आयकरअपीलसं/ I.T.A. No.1050/Mum/2019 (निर्धारणवर्ा / Assessment Year: 2014-15) Micro Ankur Developers बिधम/ Dcit-Cc, 3(4) C/O Rajendra & Associates 19Th Floor, Air India Vs. 317, Prasad Chamber, Opera Building, Nariman Point, Mumbai-400021. House, Charni Road, Mumbai-400004. स्थधयीलेखधसं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. : Aanfm4634P (अपीलार्थी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Bharat KumarFor Respondent: Dr. Mahesh Akhade (DR)
Section 132(4)Section 139Section 143(2)Section 153A

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “B” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI ABY T. VARKEY, JM AND SHRI GAGAN GOYAL, AM आयकरअपीलसं/ I.T.A. No.1046/Mum/2019 (निर्धारणवर्ा / Assessment Year: 2010-11) & आयकरअपीलसं/ I.T.A. No.1047/Mum/2019 (निर्धारणवर्ा / Assessment Year: 2011-12) & आयकरअपीलसं/ I.T.A. No.1048/Mum/2019 (निर्धारणवर्ा / Assessment Year: 2012-13) & आयकरअपीलसं/ I.T.A. No.1049/Mum/2019 (निर्धारणवर्ा / Assessment Year: 2013-14) & आयकरअपीलसं/ I.T.A. No.1050/Mum/2019 (निर्धारणवर्ा / Assessment Year: 2014-15) Micro Ankur Developers बिधम/ DCIT-CC, 3(4) C/o Rajendra & Associates 19th Floor, Air India Vs. 317, Prasad Chamb…

Micro Ankur Developers, Mumbai vs. DCIT -CC - 3 (4), Mumbai

In the result, the appeals of the assessee for AYs 2010-11, 2011-12 & 2012-

ITA 1047/MUM/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai02 Sept 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey, Jm & Shri Gagan Goyal, Am आयकरअपीलसं/ I.T.A. No.1046/Mum/2019 (निर्धारणवर्ा / Assessment Year: 2010-11) & आयकरअपीलसं/ I.T.A. No.1047/Mum/2019 (निर्धारणवर्ा / Assessment Year: 2011-12) & आयकरअपीलसं/ I.T.A. No.1048/Mum/2019 (निर्धारणवर्ा / Assessment Year: 2012-13) & आयकरअपीलसं/ I.T.A. No.1049/Mum/2019 (निर्धारणवर्ा / Assessment Year: 2013-14) & आयकरअपीलसं/ I.T.A. No.1050/Mum/2019 (निर्धारणवर्ा / Assessment Year: 2014-15) Micro Ankur Developers बिधम/ Dcit-Cc, 3(4) C/O Rajendra & Associates 19Th Floor, Air India Vs. 317, Prasad Chamber, Opera Building, Nariman Point, Mumbai-400021. House, Charni Road, Mumbai-400004. स्थधयीलेखधसं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. : Aanfm4634P (अपीलार्थी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Bharat KumarFor Respondent: Dr. Mahesh Akhade (DR)
Section 132(4)Section 139Section 143(2)Section 153A

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “B” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI ABY T. VARKEY, JM AND SHRI GAGAN GOYAL, AM आयकरअपीलसं/ I.T.A. No.1046/Mum/2019 (निर्धारणवर्ा / Assessment Year: 2010-11) & आयकरअपीलसं/ I.T.A. No.1047/Mum/2019 (निर्धारणवर्ा / Assessment Year: 2011-12) & आयकरअपीलसं/ I.T.A. No.1048/Mum/2019 (निर्धारणवर्ा / Assessment Year: 2012-13) & आयकरअपीलसं/ I.T.A. No.1049/Mum/2019 (निर्धारणवर्ा / Assessment Year: 2013-14) & आयकरअपीलसं/ I.T.A. No.1050/Mum/2019 (निर्धारणवर्ा / Assessment Year: 2014-15) Micro Ankur Developers बिधम/ DCIT-CC, 3(4) C/o Rajendra & Associates 19th Floor, Air India Vs. 317, Prasad Chamb…