28 and 29, Ashok Kapil v. Sana Ullah (dead) & Ors.

6 SCC 342Reported decision1996#11113 most cited
10

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2008 to 2025.

Issues it is cited on

section 11(5)section 119(2)section 11(2)section 119(2)(b)section 254(1)advance taxsection 80g(5)tax deducted at sourcesection 119registration under section 12asection 40(a)reasoned order

Judgments citing 28 and 29, Ashok Kapil v. Sana Ullah (dead) & Ors.

RAM NIWAS MODI CHARITABLE SOCIETY,JAIPUR vs. CIT-EXEMPTION, JAIPUR, JAIPUR

In the result, both the appeal of the assessee are disposed off\nthereby allowing the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 118/JPR/2025[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur20 Nov 2025AY 2022-23
For Appellant: Shri Mahendra Gargieya, Adv. &For Respondent: Mrs. Anita Rinesh, Ld. JCIT
Section 12ASection 80GSection 80G(5)

…tion of law. (See Priyanka Overseas (P.) Ltd.&Anr. v.\nUnion of India & Ors.1991 Suppl. (1) SCC 102, para 39, Union of India & Ors. v.\nMaj. Gen. (Retd.) Madan Lal Yadav (1996) 4 SCC 127 at 142, paras 28 and 29,\nAshok Kapil v. Sana Ullah (dead) & Ors. (1996) 6 SCC 342 at 345, para 7, Sushil\nKumar v. Rakesh Kumar (2003) 8 SCC 673 at 692, para 65, first sentence,\nKusheshwar Prasad Singh v. State of Bihar & Ors. (2007) 11 SCC 447, paras 13,\n14 and 16).'\n5. Yet however, in the entire order the Id. CIT(E) has not demonstrated how he could\nfind such activities to be sham or fake or made-up affair. It is not his c…

NAVBHARAT CHERITABLE TRUST,BHARUCH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, BHARUCH

In the result, all these three appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 27/SRT/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Surat28 Jun 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh(Physical Hearing) Navbharat Charitable Trust, I.T.O., 0, Rajpardi Jhagadia, Bharuch, Ward-1, Vs. Gujarat, Pin-393115 Bharuch. Pan No. Aactn 0979 K Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

Section 11Section 12ASection 13(10)Section 254(1)

…ition of law. (See Priyanka Overseas (P.) Ltd.& Anr. v. Union of India & Ors. 1991 Suppl. (1) SCC 102, para 39, Union of India & Ors. v. Maj. Gen. (Retd.) Madan Lal Yadav (1996) 4 SCC 127 at 142, paras 28 and 29, Ashok Kapil v. Sana Ullah (dead) & Ors. (1996) 6 SCC 342 at 345, para 7, Sushil Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar (2003) 8 SCC 673 at 692, para 65, first sentence, Kusheshwar Prasad Singh v. State of Bihar & Ors. (2007) 11 SCC 447, paras 13, 14 and 16).' 30. Section 119 of the Act is couched in very wide terms. The same is quoted below for ready reference : Instructions to subordinate authorities: "119. (1) the Boar…

NAVBHARAT CHARITABLE TRUST,BHARUCH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 1, , BHARUCH

In the result, this appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 385/SRT/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Surat28 Feb 2023AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Pawan Singhita No. 383, 384 & 385/Srt/2022 (Assessment Years: 2017-18, 2018-19 & 2019-20) (Hearing In Virtual Court) Navbharat Charitable Trust, I.T.O., 0, Rajpardi, Jhagadia, Ward-1, Vs. Bharuch. Bharuch. Pan No. Aactn 0979 K Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

Section 11Section 12ASection 13(10)Section 254(1)Section 80G

…ition of law. (See Priyanka Overseas (P.) Ltd.& Anr. v. Union of India & Ors. 1991 Suppl. (1) SCC 102, para 39, Union of India & Ors. v. Maj. Gen. (Retd.) Madan Lal Yadav (1996) 4 SCC 127 at 142, paras 28 and 29, Ashok Kapil v. Sana Ullah (dead) & Ors. (1996) 6 SCC 342 at 345, para 7, Sushil Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar (2003) 8 SCC 673 at 692, para 65, first sentence, Kusheshwar Prasad Singh v. State of Bihar & Ors. (2007) 11 SCC 447, paras 13, 14 and 16).' 30. Section 119 of the Act is couched in very wide terms. The same is quoted below for ready reference : Instructions to subordinate authorities: "119. (1) the Boar…

NAVBHARAT CHARITABLE TRUST,BHARUCH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 1, , BHARUCH

In the result, this appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 384/SRT/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Surat28 Feb 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Pawan Singhita No. 383, 384 & 385/Srt/2022 (Assessment Years: 2017-18, 2018-19 & 2019-20) (Hearing In Virtual Court) Navbharat Charitable Trust, I.T.O., 0, Rajpardi, Jhagadia, Ward-1, Vs. Bharuch. Bharuch. Pan No. Aactn 0979 K Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

Section 11Section 12ASection 13(10)Section 254(1)Section 80G

…ition of law. (See Priyanka Overseas (P.) Ltd.& Anr. v. Union of India & Ors. 1991 Suppl. (1) SCC 102, para 39, Union of India & Ors. v. Maj. Gen. (Retd.) Madan Lal Yadav (1996) 4 SCC 127 at 142, paras 28 and 29, Ashok Kapil v. Sana Ullah (dead) & Ors. (1996) 6 SCC 342 at 345, para 7, Sushil Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar (2003) 8 SCC 673 at 692, para 65, first sentence, Kusheshwar Prasad Singh v. State of Bihar & Ors. (2007) 11 SCC 447, paras 13, 14 and 16).' 30. Section 119 of the Act is couched in very wide terms. The same is quoted below for ready reference : Instructions to subordinate authorities: "119. (1) the Boar…

NAVBHARAT CHARITABLE TRUST,BHARUCH vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 1, , BHARUCH

In the result, this appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 383/SRT/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Surat28 Feb 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Pawan Singhita No. 383, 384 & 385/Srt/2022 (Assessment Years: 2017-18, 2018-19 & 2019-20) (Hearing In Virtual Court) Navbharat Charitable Trust, I.T.O., 0, Rajpardi, Jhagadia, Ward-1, Vs. Bharuch. Bharuch. Pan No. Aactn 0979 K Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/ Revenue

Section 11Section 12ASection 13(10)Section 254(1)Section 80G

…ition of law. (See Priyanka Overseas (P.) Ltd.& Anr. v. Union of India & Ors. 1991 Suppl. (1) SCC 102, para 39, Union of India & Ors. v. Maj. Gen. (Retd.) Madan Lal Yadav (1996) 4 SCC 127 at 142, paras 28 and 29, Ashok Kapil v. Sana Ullah (dead) & Ors. (1996) 6 SCC 342 at 345, para 7, Sushil Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar (2003) 8 SCC 673 at 692, para 65, first sentence, Kusheshwar Prasad Singh v. State of Bihar & Ors. (2007) 11 SCC 447, paras 13, 14 and 16).' 30. Section 119 of the Act is couched in very wide terms. The same is quoted below for ready reference : Instructions to subordinate authorities: "119. (1) the Boar…

DONGFANG ELECTRIC CORPORATION,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION 1(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 487/KOL/2015[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata25 Oct 2017AY 2010-2011

Bench: Sri N.V. Vasudevan & Sri J. Sudhakar Reddy]

Section 143(3)

…ssue of lack of reference was not disputed by the assessee for the Assessment Year 2010-11. Reliance was placed on the following case laws:- • Strategic Credit Capital Pvt. Ltd. & Ors., Versus Ratnakar Bank Ltd. [395 ITR 391] • Amiya Bala Paul vs. CIT (2003) 6 SCC 342 • SPL’s Siddhartha Ltd [2012] 345 ITR 223 5.3. He submitted that there is no reference made by the AO to the TPO, in terms of section 92 CA of the Act, the assessment order for the Assessment Year 2009-10, was required to be passed by 31/12/ 2012, and as the assessment order was passed on 31/01/2014, the assessment is barred by limitation and th…

DONGFANG ELECTRIC CORPORATION,KOLKATA vs. DDIT (IT)-1(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 572/KOL/2014[2009-2010]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata25 Oct 2017AY 2009-2010

Bench: Sri N.V. Vasudevan & Sri J. Sudhakar Reddy]

Section 143(3)

…ssue of lack of reference was not disputed by the assessee for the Assessment Year 2010-11. Reliance was placed on the following case laws:- • Strategic Credit Capital Pvt. Ltd. & Ors., Versus Ratnakar Bank Ltd. [395 ITR 391] • Amiya Bala Paul vs. CIT (2003) 6 SCC 342 • SPL’s Siddhartha Ltd [2012] 345 ITR 223 5.3. He submitted that there is no reference made by the AO to the TPO, in terms of section 92 CA of the Act, the assessment order for the Assessment Year 2009-10, was required to be passed by 31/12/ 2012, and as the assessment order was passed on 31/01/2014, the assessment is barred by limitation and th…

DR(SMT) SUJATHA RAMESH vs. CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES

WP/54672/2015HC Karnataka24 Oct 2017

Bench: The Hon'Ble Dr.Justice Vineet Kothari

Section 119Section 119(2)(b)Section 119(2)(c)Section 54Section 54E

…1/25 ® IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2017 BEFORE THE HON'BLE Dr.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI WRIT PETITION No.54672/2015 (T-IT) BETWEEN: DR.(SMT.)SUJATHA RAMESH No.219, 6TH MAIN, 6TH BLOCK, BEL LAYOUT, VIDYARANYAPURA BANGALORE – 560 097. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI V RAGHURAMAN, ADVOCATE) AND 1. CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES MINISTRY OF FINANCE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE D-1/35, NORTH BLOCK NEW DELHI – 110 001. 2. THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX BENGALURU – II, C.R.BUILDING QUEENS ROAD, BA…

The Commissioner of Income Tax IV vs. M/s. Nava Bharat Ferro Alloys Ltd.,

ITTA/392/2013HC Telangana05 Sept 2013
Section 14Section 14(1)(e)

…ingh v. Janki Singh [AIR 1967 SC 341] ,Sita Ram Bhau Patil v. Ramchandra Nago Patil [(1977) 2 SCC 49 : AIR 1977 SC 1712] , Sushil Kumar v. Rakesh RC.REV. 392/2013 & 394/2013 Page 44 of 46 Kumar [(2003) 8 SCC 673 : AIR 2004 SC 230] , United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Samir Chandra Chaudhary [(2005) 5 SCC 784] , Charanjit Lal Mehra v. Kamal Saroj Mahajan [(2005) 11 SCC 279 : AIR 2005 SC 2765] andUdham Singh v. Ram Singh [(2007) 15 SCC 529] .)” 45. Before drawing the curtain it is important to note that Harminder Singh Koghar stated in the petiti…

B.M.MALANI vs. COMMR.OF INCOME TAX

The appeal is allowed accordingly to the aforementioned extent

C.A. No.-005950-005950 - 2008Supreme Court01 Oct 2008
Section 132Section 132(4)Section 220Section 245C

…f law. [See Priyanka Overseas Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. v. Union of India & ors. 1991 Suppl. (1) SCC 102, para 39, Union of India & ors. v. Major General Madan Lal Yadav (Retd.) (1996) 4 SCC 127 at 142, paras 28 and 29, Ashok Kapil v. Sana Ullah (dead) & ors. (1996) 6 SCC 342 at 345, para 7, Sushil Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar (2003) 8 SCC 673 at 692, para 65, first 10 sentence, Kusheshwar Prasad Singh v. State of Bihar & ors. (2007) 11 scc 447, paras 13, 14 and 16). Thus, the said principle, in our opinion, should be applied even in a case of this nature. A statutory authority despite receipt of such a request could have…