264 ITR 110 (Bom.); (ii) Siddaramanna Charities Trust v. CIT

96 ITR 275Reported decision1974#13043 most cited
8

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,339 Indian tax judgments — from 2017 to 2026.

Judgments citing 264 ITR 110 (Bom.); (ii) Siddaramanna Charities Trust v. CIT

DCIT (Exemptions), Chennai vs. Great Lakes Institute of Management, Chennai

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 2879/CHNY/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai29 Oct 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Abraham P. George & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddyआयकर अपील सं./I T.A. No. 2879/Chny/2017 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year:2011-12 The Deputy Commissioner Of M/S. Great Lakes Institute Of Income Tax (Exemption), Chennai Vs. Management, No. 24, South Mada Circle, Aayakar Bhavan, Annexe Street, Srinagar Colony, Saidapet, Building, Iii Floor, 121, M.G. Road, Chennai 600 015. Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 034. [Pan:Aaccg2885L] (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By : Shri Maruda Pandian, Addl. Cit ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : None सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 11.09.2018 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 29.10.2018 आदेश /O R D E R Per Duvvuru Rl Reddy: This Appeal Filed By The Revenue Is Directed Against The Order Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) 17, Chennai Dated 14.09.2017 Relevant To The Assessment Year 2011-12. The Only Effective Ground Raised In The Appeal Of The Revenue Is That The Ld. Cit(A) Has Erred In Holding That The Assessee Is Eligible To Set Off Of Brought Forward Excess Application Of Funds To Subsequent Years.

For Appellant: Shri Maruda Pandian, Addl. CITFor Respondent: None
Section 11Section 12ASection 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)

…T vs. Maharana of Mewar Charitable Foundation [164 ITR 439 (Raj.)], (ii) CIT v. Shri Plot Swetamber Murti Pujak Jain Mandal [1995] 211 ITR 293 (Guj), (iii) CIT vs. Institute of Banking Personnel [264 ITR 110 (Bom.)]; (iv) CIT vs. Siddaramanna Charities Trust [96 ITR 275 (Mys); and (v) CIT vs. Matriseva Trust [242 ITR 20 (Mad.)]. The relevant observations of the Hon‟ble Mr. Justice S.H. Kapadia in the case of CIT vs. Institute of Banking Personnel (supra) reads as under: “Now coming to question No.3, the point which arises for consideration is: whether excess of expenditure in the earlier years can be adjusted aga…

The ITO, (Exemptions), Ward, Surat vs. Shree Ambika Niketan Trust, Surat

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 667/AHD/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Surat24 Oct 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Amarjit Singhअपील सं./Ita No.667/Ahd/2017 "नधा"रण वष"/Asstt. Year:2013-2014 Income Tax Officer, Shree Ambika Niketan Trust, [Exemption] Ward, Surat, H.No.13/52, Vs. Surat. C/0 Ambika Niketan Mandir, Khan Saheb Ni Wadi, Athwalines, Surat-395001. Pan Aabts2849C (Applicant) (Responent) Revenue By : Shri Prasanjit Singh, Cit,Dr : Assessee By Kruti Kothari, C.A सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 15/11/2018 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement: 16/11/2018 आदेश/O R D E R Per Amarjit Singh:

For Respondent: Shri Prasanjit Singh, CIT,DR
Section 11Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 70

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, सूरत "यायपीठ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ‘’SURAT’’ BENCH, SURAT BEFORE SHRI RAJPAL YADAV, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER अपील सं./ITA No.667/Ahd/2017 "नधा"रण वष"/Asstt. Year:2013-2014 Income Tax Officer, Shree Ambika Niketan Trust, [Exemption] Ward, Surat, H.No.13/52, Vs. Surat. C/0 Ambika Niketan Mandir, Khan Saheb Ni Wadi, Athwalines, Surat-395001. PAN AABTS2849C (Applicant) (Responent) Revenue by : Shri Prasanjit Singh, CIT,DR : Assessee by Kruti Kothari, C.A सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date of Hearing : 15/11/2018 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date of Pronouncement: 16/11/2018…

264 ITR 110 (Bom.); (ii) Siddaramanna Charities Trust v. CIT (96 ITR 275) — Cited in 8 Judgments | BharatTax