Grafica Flextronica, Mumbai vs. ACIT 25(2), Mumbai
In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed
ITA 295/MUM/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai06 Jun 2019AY 2010-11
Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu, Vice- & Shri Pawan Singhm/S Grafica Flextronica Acit-25(2), Room No. 508, C-10, 5Th 3, “Saurabh- “A” Chs Ltd., Vs. Ground Floor, Next To Bhuta Floor, Pratyakshkar Bhavan, High School, Shahaji Raje Bandra Kurla Complex, Marg, Vile Parle (East), ” Bandra (East), Mumbai-400057. Mumbai-400051. Pan: Aaafg4064A Appellant Respondent Appellant By : Shri Bhupendra Shah (C.A) Respondent By : Shri Abhi Rama Karthikeyan S. (Sr. Dr) Date Of Hearing : 06.06.2019 Date Of Pronouncement : 06.06.2019 Order Under Section 254(1)Of Income Tax Act
For Appellant: Shri Bhupendra Shah (C.A)For Respondent: Shri Abhi Rama Karthikeyan S. (Sr. DR)
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 154Section 254(1)Section 271(1)(c)
…ses. (i) CIT vs. Ravail Singh & Company (254 ITR 191 (P&H). (ii) Harigopal vs. CIT 9258 ITR 85 (P&H HC). ITA No. 295 Mum 2018-M/s Grafica Flextronica (iii) ITO vs. Bombaywala Readymade Store [2015] 230 Taxman 313 (Guj.). (iv) Naresh Chand Aggarwal vs. CIT (357 ITR 515 (All HC), (v) DCIT vs. Manohar Manak (ITA 5586/M/2015). (vi) Yashraj Films Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT (ITA 7519/M/2013). (vii) Sarvesh Mercantile Pvt. Ltd. (ITA 93/Mum/2011). (viii) DCIT vs. Risabh Impex (ITA 93/Mum/2011. 6. Therefore, considering the fact of the present case and in view of the above aforesaid decision, we are of the view that this is n…