22 SOT 174 (Mum) Rupee Finance & Management (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (extracted
81 Taxmann.com 257High Court2017#8547 most cited
What is 22 SOT 174 (Mum) Rupee Finance & Management (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (extracted authority for?
The burden of proof to show unexplained investment under section 69 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, lies with the revenue when the assessee has not discharged it.
13
judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,005 Indian tax judgments — from 2017 to 2026.
Also referred to as
Rupee Finance & Management (P.) Ltd v ACIT · section 69 · unexplained investment · burden of proof · revenue · assessment · onus of proof · income tax