2004 (2) MH.L.J: ABDUL RAZAK HAJI ISMAIL v. DIRECTOR OF ENFORCEMENT, NEW DELHI AND OTHERS

4 SCC 620Reported decision2006#7906 most cited

What is 2004 (2) MH.L.J: ABDUL RAZAK HAJI ISMAIL v. DIRECTOR OF ENFORCEMENT, NEW DELHI AND OTHERS authority for?

The court in this case affirms that a person accused under IPC sections 420 and 506, when facing investigation related to a scheduled offense, can be subject to proceedings under relevant laws.

14

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,005 Indian tax judgments — from 2020 to 2020.

Also referred to as

Abdul Razak Haji Ismail · Director of Enforcement · IPC 420 · IPC 506 · scheduled offence · FIR · charge sheet · criminal proceedings

Judgments citing 2004 (2) MH.L.J: ABDUL RAZAK HAJI ISMAIL v. DIRECTOR OF ENFORCEMENT, NEW DELHI AND OTHERS

2004 (2) MH.L.J: ABDUL RAZAK HAJI ISMAIL v. DIRECTOR OF ENFORCEMENT, NEW DELHI AND OTHERS (4 SCC 620) — Cited in 14 Judgments | BharatTax