20/215 Taxman 597 (Kar.); 8. CIT v. Udaipur DugdhUtpadak Sahakari Sangh Ltd.

217 Taxmann 64Reported decision2013#520 most cited
182

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,339 Indian tax judgments — from 2017 to 2024.

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing 20/215 Taxman 597 (Kar.); 8. CIT v. Udaipur DugdhUtpadak Sahakari Sangh Ltd.

M/S Sree Lakshmi Venkateswara Spinning Mills (P) Ltd., Palladam vs. DCIT, CPC, Bengaluru

The appeal stands allowed in terms of our above order

ITA 37/CHNY/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai11 Apr 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Mahavir Singh & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am

For Appellant: Shri Yeshwanth Kumar (CA) -Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri ARV Sreenivasan (Addl. CIT) – Ld. DR
Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 2(24)(x)Section 36Section 36(1)(va)Section 40Section 43B

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण ‘ए’ "ायपीठ चे"ई म"। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH, CHENNAI माननीय "ी महावीर िसंह, उपा"" एवं माननीय "ी मनोज कुमार अ"वाल ,लेखा सद" के सम"। BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, VICE PRESIDENT AND HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM आयकरअपीलसं./ ITA No. 37/Chny/2022 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2018-19) Sree Lakshmi Venkateswara Spinning Mills (P) Ltd बनाम DCIT S.F.No. 2, Karadivavi, Centralized Processing Center / Palladam – 641 664. Vs. Bengaluru – 560 500 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No. AACCS-7041-L (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ"कीओरसे/ Appellant by : S…