177 ITR 393 (Bombay) (PB- I: Pg 89) 6) Jamuna Vernekar v. CIT
56 Taxmann.com 460High Court2015#8500 most cited
What is 177 ITR 393 (Bombay) (PB- I: Pg 89) 6) Jamuna Vernekar v. CIT authority for?
Payments from a closely held company to a concern in which a shareholder has substantial interest may be treated as deemed dividend under section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, if the conditions are met. However, if such amounts are repaid and the subsidiary's ledger account becomes a debit balance reflecting as sundry debtors, it supports the assessee's case.
13
judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,339 Indian tax judgments — from 2021 to 2025.
Also referred to as
Jamuna Vernekar v. CIT · CIT v. Nagindas M Kapadia · 177 ITR 393 · Bombay High Court · section 2(22)(e) · deemed dividend · accumulated profits · business expediency · beneficial owner · refund of loans · sundry debtors · debit balance