15 ITA Nos 98 to 101 of 2022 The Fateh Maidan Club Brigada Plaza Unit Owners Association v. ITO, Ward 5(2)(3L Bangalore

129 Taxmann.com 51Reported decision#18947 most cited
4

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 362,162 Indian tax judgments — from 2022 to 2022.

Judgments citing 15 ITA Nos 98 to 101 of 2022 The Fateh Maidan Club Brigada Plaza Unit Owners Association v. ITO, Ward 5(2)(3L Bangalore

The Fateh Maidan Club(AOP), Hyderabad vs. DCIT, Circle -5 (1), Hyderabad

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 99/HYD/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad30 Jun 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda

For Appellant: Sri S. Rama Rao, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sri Waseem Ur Rehman,DR
Section 142(1)Section 144Section 147Section 148

…ITA Nos 98 to 101 of 2022 The Fateh Maidan Club आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, हैदराबाद पीठ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL Hyderabad SMC Bench, Hyderabad Before Shri R. K. PANDA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA Nos.98 to 101/Hyd/2022 Assessment Years: 2012-13 to 2016-17 The Fateh Maidan Club Vs. Dy. C.I.T. Hyderabad Circle 5(1) PAN:AAFAT7563F Hyderabad (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by: Sri S. Rama Rao, Advocate Revenue by: Sri Waseem Ur Rehman,DR Date of hearing: 14/06/2022 Date of pronouncement: 30/06/2022 ORDER The above batch of 4 appeals filed by the assessee are directed against the separate orders dated 31.0…

DCIT, Circle -5 (1), Hyderabad vs. The Fateh Maidan Club, Hyderabad

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 98/HYD/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad30 Jun 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda

For Appellant: Sri S. Rama Rao, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sri Waseem Ur Rehman,DR
Section 142(1)Section 144Section 147Section 148

…ITA Nos 98 to 101 of 2022 The Fateh Maidan Club आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, हैदराबाद पीठ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL Hyderabad SMC Bench, Hyderabad Before Shri R. K. PANDA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA Nos.98 to 101/Hyd/2022 Assessment Years: 2012-13 to 2016-17 The Fateh Maidan Club Vs. Dy. C.I.T. Hyderabad Circle 5(1) PAN:AAFAT7563F Hyderabad (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by: Sri S. Rama Rao, Advocate Revenue by: Sri Waseem Ur Rehman,DR Date of hearing: 14/06/2022 Date of pronouncement: 30/06/2022 ORDER The above batch of 4 appeals filed by the assessee are directed against the separate orders dated 31.0…

The Fateh Maidan Club(AOP), Hyderabad vs. DCIT, Circle -5 (1), Hyderabad

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 101/HYD/2022[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad30 Jun 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda

For Appellant: Sri S. Rama Rao, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sri Waseem Ur Rehman,DR
Section 142(1)Section 144Section 147Section 148

…ITA Nos 98 to 101 of 2022 The Fateh Maidan Club आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, हैदराबाद पीठ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL Hyderabad SMC Bench, Hyderabad Before Shri R. K. PANDA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA Nos.98 to 101/Hyd/2022 Assessment Years: 2012-13 to 2016-17 The Fateh Maidan Club Vs. Dy. C.I.T. Hyderabad Circle 5(1) PAN:AAFAT7563F Hyderabad (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by: Sri S. Rama Rao, Advocate Revenue by: Sri Waseem Ur Rehman,DR Date of hearing: 14/06/2022 Date of pronouncement: 30/06/2022 ORDER The above batch of 4 appeals filed by the assessee are directed against the separate orders dated 31.0…

The Fateh Maidan Club(AOP), Hyderabad vs. DCIT, Circle -5 (1), Hyderabad

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 100/HYD/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad30 Jun 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda

For Appellant: Sri S. Rama Rao, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sri Waseem Ur Rehman,DR
Section 142(1)Section 144Section 147Section 148

…ITA Nos 98 to 101 of 2022 The Fateh Maidan Club आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, हैदराबाद पीठ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL Hyderabad SMC Bench, Hyderabad Before Shri R. K. PANDA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA Nos.98 to 101/Hyd/2022 Assessment Years: 2012-13 to 2016-17 The Fateh Maidan Club Vs. Dy. C.I.T. Hyderabad Circle 5(1) PAN:AAFAT7563F Hyderabad (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by: Sri S. Rama Rao, Advocate Revenue by: Sri Waseem Ur Rehman,DR Date of hearing: 14/06/2022 Date of pronouncement: 30/06/2022 ORDER The above batch of 4 appeals filed by the assessee are directed against the separate orders dated 31.0…

15 ITA Nos 98 to 101 of 2022 The Fateh Maidan Club Brigada Plaza Unit Owners Association v. ITO, Ward 5(2)(3L Bangalore (129 Taxmann.com 51) — Cited in 4 Judgments | BharatTax