14/(2015) 229 (Punjab & Haryana) (iii) CIT v. Banwari Lal Banshidhar
73 Taxmann.com 100High Court2016#4225 most cited
What is 14/(2015) 229 (Punjab & Haryana) (iii) CIT v. Banwari Lal Banshidhar authority for?
Once books of account are rejected, additions should not be made on a line-by-line basis. If the Assessing Officer rejects the books, they must either disallow all sundry creditors or allow only those for which genuineness can be proven.
28
judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,418 Indian tax judgments — from 2022 to 2024.
Also referred to as
CIT v. Banwari Lal Banshidhar · rejection of books of account · section 145(1) · section 145(3) · sundry creditors · creditworthiness of the creditor · best judgment assessment · line by line addition · trade creditors · on-money