133 ITR 204 (Cal), CIT v. Standard Motor Products of India Ltd.

149 ITR 487High Court1984#22636 most cited
3

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 348,487 Indian tax judgments — from 2017 to 2019.

Judgments citing 133 ITR 204 (Cal), CIT v. Standard Motor Products of India Ltd.

Ppn Properties Pvt. Ltd., Delhi vs. ITO, Ward- 19(2), New Delhi

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 3060/DEL/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi16 Jan 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri N.S. Sainiassessment Year: 2009-10

Section 131Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

…n Refrigeration Industries P. Ltd. [1980] 46 STC 264 (Mad), CIT v. Ramsevak Paul [1977] 110 ITR 527 (Cal), CIT v. Assam Oil Co. Ltd. [1982] 133 ITR 204 (Cal), CIT v. Standard Motor Products of India Ltd. [1983] 142 ITR 877 (Mad), CIT v. Rangnath Bangur [1984] 149 ITR 487 (Raj), State Bank of Hyderabad v. CIT [1988] 171 ITR 232 (AP) and CIT v. Indian Rare Earth Ltd. [1990] 181 ITR 22 (Bom) [FB]. [1993] 200 ITR 614W (SC)” 15. He further relied of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT Vs. Karan Singh & Ors (19930 200 ITR 61 (SC) where it was held that :- “The basic rules of interpreting court judgments are…

Prashant Agencies Pvt. Ltd., Delhi vs. ITO, Ward- 19(3), New Delhi

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 3059/DEL/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi16 Jan 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri N.S. Sainiassessment Year: 2009-10

Section 131Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

…n Refrigeration Industries P. Ltd. [1980] 46 STC 264 (Mad), CIT v. Ramsevak Paul [1977] 110 ITR 527 (Cal), CIT v. Assam Oil Co. Ltd. [1982] 133 ITR 204 (Cal), CIT v. Standard Motor Products of India Ltd. [1983] 142 ITR 877 (Mad), CIT v. Rangnath Bangur [1984] 149 ITR 487 (Raj), State Bank of Hyderabad v. CIT [1988] 171 ITR 232 (AP) and CIT v. Indian Rare Earth Ltd. [1990] 181 ITR 22 (Bom) [FB]. [1993] 200 ITR 614W (SC)” 15. He further relied of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT Vs. Karan Singh & Ors (19930 200 ITR 61 (SC) where it was held that :- “The basic rules of interpreting court judgments are…

Fateh Chand Charitable Trust, Muzaffarnagar vs. Addl. CIT, Meerut

In the result, the Appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 289/DEL/2012[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi07 Jun 2017AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri H.S. Sidhu

For Appellant: Sh. K. Sampath, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Anil Kr. Sharma, Sr. DR
Section 139(3)Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 148Section 254

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH “B”: NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI H.S. SIDHU, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI O.P. KANT, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER A.Y. : 2005-06 FATEH CHAND CHARITABLE TRUST, VS. ADDL. CIT, RANGE-2 115 KM MILE STONE, MUZZAFARNAGAR DELHI DEHRADUN HIGHWAY, MUZAFFARNGAR (PAN:AAATF1445N) (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : Sh. K. Sampath, Adv. Department by : Sh. Anil Kr. Sharma, Sr. DR O R D E R PER H.S. SIDHU, JM This appeal is filed by the Assessee is directed against the Order dated 20.9.2011 of the Ld. CIT(A), Muzaffarngar relevant to assessment year 2005-06 on the following grounds:- 1. Tha…

133 ITR 204 (Cal), CIT v. Standard Motor Products of India Ltd. (149 ITR 487) — Cited in 3 Judgments | BharatTax