128 ITR 326 (Cal), Hindustan Lever Ltd. v. R.B. Wadkar
67 Taxmann.com 57High Court2016#2655 most cited
What is 128 ITR 326 (Cal), Hindustan Lever Ltd. v. R.B. Wadkar authority for?
Subsequent explanations or affidavits cannot supplement the reasons provided in an original satisfaction note.
44
judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,339 Indian tax judgments — from 2018 to 2026.
Also referred to as
Hindustan Lever Ltd. v. R.B. Wadkar · 128 ITR 326 · reasons cannot be supplemented · subsequent explanations · affidavits · satisfaction note · incriminating material