How many judgments cite 11. Rakesh Gupta v. CIT P&H High Court?

37 judgments on BharatTax cite 11. Rakesh Gupta v. CIT P&H High Court (93 Taxmann.com 271), spanning 2019 to 2025.

Which sections of the Income Tax Act does 11. Rakesh Gupta v. CIT P&H High Court come up under?

It is most often cited in judgments turning on Section 143(3), Section 147, Section 148, Section 143(1), Section 151, Section 133A.

11. Rakesh Gupta v. CIT P&H High Court

93 Taxmann.com 271High Court2018#3211 most cited

What is 11. Rakesh Gupta v. CIT P&H High Court authority for?

Reopening of assessment is based on a prima facie belief that income has escaped assessment. The Assessing Officer does not need to conclusively prove escapement of income to assume jurisdiction under section 147.

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,421 Indian tax judgments — from 2019 to 2025.

Also referred to as

Rakesh Gupta v CIT · 93 taxmann.com 271 · section 147 · reassessment · escapement of income · reason to believe · prima facie belief · tangible material · non application of mind · borrowed satisfaction · income escaping assessment

Sections most often in play

Section 143(3)Section 147 Section 148 Section 143(1)Section 151 Section 133A Section 68 Section 115BBE

Issues it is cited on

first proviso to section 147 section 151(1)kelvinator shell company live link non application of mind borrowed satisfaction tangible material income escaping assessment reason to believe reopening of assessment escapement of income

Judgments citing 11. Rakesh Gupta v. CIT P&H High Court

Giggle Infotech Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi vs. ITO, Ward- 10(1), New Delhi

In the result, the Appeal filed by the Assessee stands partly allowed

ITA 1284/DEL/2018[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi01 Jan 2020AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri H.S. Sidhuassessment Year : 2008-09

For Appellant: Sh. Deepak Ostwal, FCAFor Respondent: Sh. Pradeep Singh Gautam, Sr.DR

Section 132Section 139Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 68

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCHES : SMC : NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI H.S. SIDHU, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year : 2008-09 M/S GIGGLE INFOTECH PVT. Vs. ITO, WARD 10(1), LTD., NEW DELHI C/O D. OSTWAL & ASSOCIATES, 310, COMPETENT HOUSE, F-14, MIDDLE CIRCLE, CONNAUGHT PLACE, NEW DELHI – 110 001 (PAN: AACCG6898F) (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : Sh. Deepak Ostwal, FCA Department by : Sh. Pradeep Singh Gautam, Sr.DR.. ORDER This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order passed by the Ld. CIT(A)-35, New Delhi on 09.11.2017 in relation to the assessment year 2008-09 on the follo…

Tara Alloys Ltd., New Delhi vs. ITO, Ward- 16(1), New Delhi

In the result, the Appeal filed by the Assessee stands partly allowed

ITA 5407/DEL/2018[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi19 Dec 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri H.S. Sidhuassessment Year : 2007-08

For Appellant: Sh. Nippun Mittal, CAFor Respondent: Sh. Pradeep Singh Gautam, Sr. DR

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 151Section 68

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCHE : SMC : NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI H.S. SIDHU, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year : 2007-08 TARA ALLOYS LTD., Vs. ITO, WARD 16(1), 102, HARSHA HOUSE, NEW DELHI KARAMPURA COMMERCIAL COMPLEX, NEW DELHI – 110 015 (PAN: AAACT0545N) (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : Sh. Nippun Mittal, CA Department by : Sh. Pradeep Singh Gautam, Sr. DR. ORDER This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order passed by the Ld. CIT(A)-16, New Delhi on 30.05.2018 in relation to the assessment year 2007-08 on the following grounds:- 1. On the facts and circumstances of th…

Heat Flown Electricals Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi vs. ITO, Ward- 11(2), New Delhi

In the result, the Appeal filed by the Assessee stands partly allowed

ITA 3692/DEL/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Dec 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri H.S. Sidhuassessment Year : 2010-11

For Appellant: Ms. Rano Jain, Adv. & Sh. PranshuFor Respondent: Sh. Pradeep Singh Gautam, Sr. DR

Section 147Section 148Section 68Section 69C

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCHE : SMC : NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI H.S. SIDHU, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year : 2010-11 HEAT FLOWN ELECTRICALS PVT. Vs. ITO, WARD 11(2), LTD., NEW DELHI 207, ALLIED HOUSE, 2, OLD ROHTAK ROAD, INDERLOK, NEW DELHI – 35 (PAN: AABCH0771R) (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : Ms. Rano Jain, Adv. & Sh. Pranshu Singhal, CA Department by : Sh. Pradeep Singh Gautam, Sr. DR. ORDER This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order passed by the Ld. CIT(A)-4, New Delhi on 29.03.2019 in relation to the assessment year 2010-11 on the following grounds:- 1.…

Neelam Arora, New Delhi vs. ITO, Ward-36(4), New Delhi

In the result, all the five appeals filed by the respective assesses are allowed

ITA 2689/DEL/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi17 Dec 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri H.S. Sidhui.T.A. No. 2689/Del/2019 Assessment Year: 2010-11 Neelam Arora, Vs. Ito, Ward-36(4), C/O Kapil Goel, Adv. New Delhi F-26/124, Sector-7, Rohini, Delhi – 85 (Pan: Afkpa9328J) (Assessee) (Respondent Assessee By : Shri Kapil Goel, Adv. Revenue By : Shri Pradeep Singh Gautam, Sr. Dr.

For Appellant: Shri Kapil Goel, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Pradeep Singh Gautam, Sr. DR

Section 147Section 148Section 151

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH : SMC : NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI H.S. SIDHU, JUDICIAL MEMBER I.T.A. No. 2689/Del/2019 Assessment Year: 2010-11 NEELAM ARORA, vs. ITO, WARD-36(4), C/O KAPIL GOEL, ADV. NEW DELHI F-26/124, SECTOR-7, ROHINI, DELHI – 85 (PAN: AFKPA9328J) (ASSESSEE) (RESPONDENT Assessee by : Shri Kapil Goel, Adv. Revenue by : Shri Pradeep Singh Gautam, Sr. DR. ORDER The Assessee has filed this appeal against the impugned order dated 20.11.2018 passed by the Ld. CIT(A)-12, New Delhi on the following grounds:- 1. That order passed by Ld AO dated 29/12/2017 and further order passed by ld…

Blue Chip Developers (P) Ltd., New Delhi vs. ITO, Ward- 5(1), New Delhi

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed

ITA 1061/DEL/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi02 Dec 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri H.S. Sidhui.T.A. No. 1061/Del/2019 Assessment Year: 2009-10 Blue Chip Developers (P) Ltd., Vs. Ito, Ward-5(1), C/O Raj Kumar & Associates, Cas New Delhi L-7A (Lgf), South Extension, Part-2, New Delhi – 49 (Pan: Aabcb4432B) (Assessee) (Respondent Assessee By : Shri Raj Kumar, Ca & Sh. Sumit Goel, Ca Revenue By : Shri Pradeep Singh Gautam, Sr. Dr.

For Appellant: Shri Raj Kumar, CA & Sh. Sumit Goel, CAFor Respondent: Shri Pradeep Singh Gautam, Sr. DR

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 151Section 68Section 69

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH : SMC : NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI H.S. SIDHU, JUDICIAL MEMBER I.T.A. No. 1061/Del/2019 Assessment Year: 2009-10 BLUE CHIP DEVELOPERS (P) LTD., vs. ITO, WARD-5(1), C/O RAJ KUMAR & ASSOCIATES, CAs NEW DELHI L-7A (LGF), SOUTH EXTENSION, PART-2, NEW DELHI – 49 (PAN: AABCB4432B) (ASSESSEE) (RESPONDENT Assessee by : Shri Raj Kumar, CA & Sh. Sumit Goel, CA Revenue by : Shri Pradeep Singh Gautam, Sr. DR. ORDER The Assessee has filed this appeal against the impugned order dated 15.01.2019 passed by the Ld. CIT(A)-2, New Delhi on the following grounds:- 1. That under the f…

Anurag, Ghaziabad vs. ITO, Ward-1(1), Ghaziabad

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed

ITA 1023/DEL/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi25 Nov 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri H.S. Sidhui.T.A. No. 1023/Del/2019 Assessment Year: 2010-11 Anurag, Vs. Ito, Ward-1(1), E-26, Shastri Nagar, Ghaziabad Meerut Uttar Padesh Pin: 250002 (Pan: Aawpa7602C) (Assessee) (Respondent Assessee By : Shri M.P. Rastogi, Adv. Revenue By : Shri Pradeep Singh Gautam, Sr. Dr.

For Appellant: Shri M.P. Rastogi, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Pradeep Singh Gautam, Sr. DR

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 234B

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH : SMC : NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI H.S. SIDHU, JUDICIAL MEMBER I.T.A. No. 1023/Del/2019 Assessment Year: 2010-11 ANURAG, vs. ITO, WARD-1(1), E-26, SHASTRI NAGAR, GHAZIABAD MEERUT UTTAR PADESH PIN: 250002 (PAN: AAWPA7602C) (ASSESSEE) (RESPONDENT Assessee by : Shri M.P. Rastogi, Adv. Revenue by : Shri Pradeep Singh Gautam, Sr. DR. ORDER The Assessee has filed this appeal against the impugned order dated 04.11.2018 passed by the Ld. CIT(A), Ghaziabad on the following grounds:- 1. That there was no valid assumption of jurisdiction u/s. 147/148 of the Income Tax Act, 1…

Umesh Kumar Tyagi, Delhi vs. ITO, Ward- 2(1), Ghaziabad

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 2978/DEL/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi22 Nov 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri H.S. Sidhu

For Appellant: Shri Kapil Goel, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Pradeep Singh Gautam, Sr. DR

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 56

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH : SMC : NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI H.S. SIDHU, JUDICIAL MEMBER I.T.A. No. 2978/Del/2019 Assessment Year: 2010-11 UMESH KUMAR TYAGI, vs. ITO, WARD-2(1), C/O KAPIL GOEL, ADV. GHAZIABAD F-26/124, SECTOR-7, ROHINI, DELHI – 110 085 (PAN: AFGPT9580F) (ASSESSEE) (RESPONDENT Assessee by : Shri Kapil Goel, Advocate Revenue by : Shri Pradeep Singh Gautam, Sr. DR. ORDER The Assessee has filed this appeal against the impugned order dated 31.01.2019 passed by the Ld. CIT(A), Ghaziabad on the following grounds:- “1. That on facts and circumstances of the case and in law, action…

Dharmender Kumar, New Delhi vs. ITO, Ward- 65(5), New Delhi

In the result, the Appeal filed by the Assessee stands partly allowed

ITA 2728/DEL/2018[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi16 Oct 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri H.S. Sidhuassessment Year : 2008-09

For Appellant: Sh. Raj Kumar, CA & Sh. Sumit Goel, CAFor Respondent: Ms. Ekta Vishnoi, Sr. DR

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 151Section 69A

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCHE :SMC : NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI H.S. SIDHU, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year : 2008-09 DHARMENDER KUMAR Vs. ITO, WARD 65(5), C/O RAJ KUMAR & ASSOCIATES,. NEW DELHI L-7A(LGF), SOUTH EXTENSION PART-II, NEW DELHI (PAN: ASGPK3927N) (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : Sh. Raj Kumar, CA & Sh. Sumit Goel, CA Department by : Ms. Ekta Vishnoi, Sr. DR. ORDER This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order passed by the Ld. CIT(A)-21, New Delhi on 28.03.2018 in relation to the assessment year 2008-09 on the following grounds:- 1. That under the facts…

Magan Behari Lal, Delhi vs. DCIT Circle-16(2), New Delhi

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed on the point of law

ITA 4558/DEL/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi16 Sept 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri N.K. Billaiya, [Assessment Year: 2009-10]

Section 133ASection 143(1)Section 148

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI ‘SMC’ BENCH, NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI N.K. BILLAIYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER, [Assessment Year: 2009-10] Magan Behari Lal, DCIT, S-89, Greater Kailash II, Circle-16(2), C.R. Building, I.P. Estate, New Delhi-110048 New Delhi-110002 PAN-AAQPL1792A Appellant Respondent Assessee by Shri Salil Kapoor, Ms. Ananya Kapoor & Shri Sumit Lal Chandani, Revenue by Shri S.L. Anuragi Date of Hearing 11/09/2019 Date of Pronouncement 16/09/2019 ORDER This appeal by the assessee is preferred against the order of the CIT(A)-6, Delhi, dated 28/03/2019, pertaining to Assessment Year 2009-10. 2.…

Ramdev Mundhra, New Delhi vs. ITO Ward - 55(5), New Delhi

In the result, all the five appeals filed by the respective assessees are allowed

ITA 1722/DEL/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi21 Aug 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda

For Appellant: Shri Kapil Goel, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri S.L. Anuragi, Sr.DR

Section 10(38)Section 127Section 147Section 148Section 151Section 68Section 69

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH : SMC : NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI R.K. PANDA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No. & A.Y. Assessee Address Department C-190, B-III, 3rd 1375/Del/2019, Gopal Chand Mundhra ITO, Ward-55(5), A.Y: 2011-12 and Sons Floor, Block-C, New Delhi. PAN: AAAHG1928B Vivek Vihar, Phase-I, New Delhi. 1721/Del/2019, Damyanti Mundhra - DO- - DO- A.Y: 2011-12 PAN: AAGPM1023P 1722/Del/2019, Ramdev Mundhra - DO - - DO - A.Y: 2011-12 PAN: AAIPM5877B - - 1523/Del/2019, Shriya Devi Mundhra DO - DO - A.Y: 2011-12 PAN: AADPD7008G - - 1524/Del/2019, Gopal Chand Mundhra DO - DO - A.Y. 2011-12 PAN: AAGPM10…

Shriya Devi Mundhra, New Delhi vs. ITO Ward 55(5), New Delhi

In the result, all the five appeals filed by the respective assessees are allowed

ITA 1523/DEL/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi21 Aug 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda

For Appellant: Shri Kapil Goel, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri S.L. Anuragi, Sr.DR

Section 10(38)Section 127Section 147Section 148Section 151Section 68Section 69

Gopal Chand Mundhra and Sons, New Delhi vs. ITO, Ward-55(5), New Delhi

In the result, all the five appeals filed by the respective assessees are allowed

ITA 1375/DEL/2019[2011-121]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi21 Aug 2019AY 2011-121

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda

For Appellant: Shri Kapil Goel, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri S.L. Anuragi, Sr.DR

Section 10(38)Section 127Section 147Section 148Section 151Section 68Section 69

Neelkanth Plywood Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi vs. ITO, Ward- 18(1), New Delhi

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 6702/DEL/2018[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi21 Aug 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: Sh. R. K. Pandaassessment Year: 2008-09 M/S. Neelkanth Plywood Pvt. Income Tax Officer Ltd. C/O Anil Jain Dd & Co. Vs Ward – 18 (1) Chartered Accountants, 611, New Delhi Surya Kiran Building, 19 K. G. Marg, New Delhi-110001 Pan No.Aaacn0805B (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 133Section 143(1)Section 147Section 148Section 271Section 68

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH ‘SMC’, NEW DELHI BEFORE SH. R. K. PANDA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Year: 2008-09 M/s. Neelkanth Plywood Pvt. Income Tax Officer Ltd. C/o Anil Jain DD & Co. Vs Ward – 18 (1) Chartered Accountants, 611, New Delhi Surya Kiran Building, 19 K. G. Marg, New Delhi-110001 PAN No.AAACN0805B (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) Appellant by Sh.Anil Kumar Jain, CA Respondent by Shri S. L. Anuragi, Sr. DR Date of hearing: 02/07/2019 Date of Pronouncement: /08/2019 ORDER PER R.K. PANDA, AM: This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 31.08.2018 of the…

Damyanti Mundhra, New Delhi vs. ITO Ward-55(5), New Delhi

In the result, all the five appeals filed by the respective assessees are allowed

ITA 1721/DEL/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi21 Aug 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda

For Appellant: Shri Kapil Goel, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri S.L. Anuragi, Sr.DR

Section 10(38)Section 127Section 147Section 148Section 151Section 68Section 69

Gopal Chand Mundhra, New Delhi vs. ITO Ward-55(5), New Delhi

In the result, all the five appeals filed by the respective assessees are allowed

ITA 1524/DEL/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi21 Aug 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda

For Appellant: Shri Kapil Goel, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri S.L. Anuragi, Sr.DR

Section 10(38)Section 127Section 147Section 148Section 151Section 68Section 69

Sanjay Kumar Jain, New Delhi vs. ITO Ward - 63(2), New Delhi

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 825/DEL/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi25 Jul 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Sh. H.S. Sidhuassessment Year: 2009-10

Section 133(6)Section 147Section 153A

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH ‘SMC’, NEW DELHI BEFORE SH. H.S. SIDHU, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year: 2009-10 Sanjay Kumar Jain, ITO, Ward 63(2), B-2/78, Ashok Vihar, Vs New Delhi Phase-II, New Delhi – 6 (PAN: AAGPJ2808K) (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) Appellant by Sh. Rajat Jain, FCA & Sh. Akshat Jain, FCA Respondent by Sh. S.L. Anuragi, Sr. DR. ORDER This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 26.11.2018 of the CIT(A)-20, New Delhi relating to A. Y. 2009-10 on the following grounds:- i) That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Ld. CIT(A) erred…

Dilwara Leasing & Investment Ltd., Delhi vs. ITO, Ward-7(3), New Delhi

In the result, the Appeal filed by the Assessee

ITA 3927/DEL/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi11 Jan 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri H.S. Sidhuassessment Year : 2009-10

For Appellant: Sh. Kapil Goel, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. S.L. Anuragi, Sr. DR

Section 143(2)Section 147Section 148

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCHES : SMC : NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI H.S. SIDHU, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year : 2009-10 DILWARA LEASING & Vs. ITO, WARD 7(3), INVESTMENT LTD., NEW DELHI C/O KAPIL GOEL, ADV., F-26/124, SECTOR-7, ROHINI, DELHI – 110 085 (PAN: AAACD0488N) (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : Sh. Kapil Goel, Adv. Department by : Sh. S.L. Anuragi, Sr. DR. ORDER This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order passed by the Ld. CIT(A)-3, Delhi on 15.02.2018 in relation to the assessment year 2009-10 on the following grounds:- 1. That on the facts and in the circum…