100(Gujarat); CIT v. South India Corporation Ltd.

58 Taxmann.com 208High Court2015#18087 most cited
5

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 348,627 Indian tax judgments — from 2017 to 2022.

Judgments citing 100(Gujarat); CIT v. South India Corporation Ltd.

D.D.Builders Limited, Bhubaneswar vs. ACIT, Central Circle-2, Bhubaneswar

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 13/CTK/2021[2018-19]Status: HeardITAT Cuttack25 Aug 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Arun Khodpiad.D.Builders Ltd., Plot No.36-F, Bjb Nagar, Bhubaneswar Pan No.Aabcd 1433 E ………………Assessee Versus Acit, Central Circle-2, Bhubaneswar ………………..Revenue Shri Kamal Kumar Agrawalla, Ca For The Assessee Shri M.K.Gautam, Cit-Dr For The Revenue Date Of Hearing : 25/08/2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 25/08/2022 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench : This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of The Ld. Cit(A)-2, Bhubaneswar, Passed In I.T.Appeal No.0465/19-20, Dated 18.01.2021 For The Assessment Year 2018-2019. 2. It Was Submitted By The Ld. Ar Of The Assessee That The Only Issue In This Appeal Was Against The Action Of The Ld. Cit(A) In Confirming The Disallowance Of Pf & Esi Paid By The Assessee Beyond The Due Date As Prescribed Under The Respective Acts But Before The Due Date Of Filing Of The Return. Ld. Ar Placed Before Us A Decision Of The Coordinate Bench Of The Tribunal In The Case Of Odyssey Motors Pvt. Ltd., In Ita

Section 36(1)(va)

…आयकर अपीऱीय अधिकरण, कटक न्यायपीठ,कटक IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL CUTTACK BENCH CUTTACK श्री जाजज माथन, न्याययक सदस्य एवं श्री अरुण खोड़पऩया ऱेखा सदस्य के समक्ष । BEFORE SHRI GEORGE MATHAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI ARUN KHODPIA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER D.D.Builders Ltd., Plot No.36-F, BJB Nagar, Bhubaneswar PAN No.AABCD 1433 E ………………Assessee Versus ACIT, Central Circle-2, Bhubaneswar ………………..Revenue Shri Kamal Kumar Agrawalla, CA for the assessee Shri M.K.Gautam, CIT-DR for the Revenue Date of Hearing : 25/08/2022 Date of Pronouncement : 25/08/2022 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench : This is an appeal filed by the ass…

100(Gujarat); CIT v. South India Corporation Ltd. (58 Taxmann.com 208) — Cited in 5 Judgments | BharatTax