1 (Kar) (iii) CIT V. Steller Investments Ltd (2001) 251 ITR 263 (SC) (iv) ITO v. Ankush Finstock Ltd.

54 Taxmann.com 75High Court2015#15955 most cited
6

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 348,607 Indian tax judgments — from 2019 to 2022.

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing 1 (Kar) (iii) CIT V. Steller Investments Ltd (2001) 251 ITR 263 (SC) (iv) ITO v. Ankush Finstock Ltd.

Nuland Infrastructure Private Limited, Hyderabad vs. Income Tax Offiers, Ward -16(2), Hyderabad

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 23/HYD/2022[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad04 Aug 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Laliet Kumarassessment Year: 2011-12 M/S. Nuland Infrastructure Vs. Income Tax Officer (P) Ltd, Hyderabad Ward 16(2) Pan:Aaccn5235D Hyderabad (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By: Shri T. Rajender Prasad, Ca Revenue By: Shri Rajendra Kumar, Cit (Dr) Date Of Hearing: 02/08/2022 Date Of Pronouncement: 04/08/2022 Order Per R.K. Panda, A.M This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Dated 8.5.2020 Of The Learned Cit (A)-4, Hyderabad Relating To A.Y.2011-12. 2. There Is A Delay Of 545 Days In Filing Of This Appeal By The Assessee For Which The Assessee Has Filed A Condonation Application Along With An Affidavit Explaining The Reasons For Such Delay Which Is Due To The Prevailing Covid. After Hearing Both The Sides & Following The Decision Of The Hon'Ble Supreme Court In The Case Of Suo Moto Write Petition (C) No.3 Of 2020 Order Dated 10.01.2022 Wherein It Is Held That The Period From 15.3.2020 Till

For Appellant: Shri T. Rajender Prasad, CAFor Respondent: Shri Rajendra Kumar, CIT (DR)
Section 142(1)Section 144Section 148

…2022 Nuland Infrastructure P Ltd Hyderabad accordance with law and therefore, the order of the learned CIT (A) should be set aside and the additions made be deleted: (i) CIT vs. Lovely Exports (P) Ltd (2008) 216 CTR 195(S.C) (ii) CIT vs. Anurag Agarwal (2015)54 Taxmann.com 75(All) (iii) PCIT V Himachal Fibres Ltd (2018) 98 Taxmann.com 173 (S.C) (iv) CIT vs. HLT Finance (P) Ltd (2011) 12 Taxmann.com 247 (v) CIT vs. Shree Rama Multi Tech Ltd (2013) 34 Taxmann.com 177 (vi) CIT (Central) vs. Som Tobacco India Ltd (2014) 42 Taxmann.com 310 (vii) CIT-1 vs. Gagandeep Infrastructure (P) Ltd (2017) 80 Taxmann.com 272 (vi…

1 (Kar) (iii) CIT V. Steller Investments Ltd (2001) 251 ITR 263 (SC) (iv) ITO v. Ankush Finstock Ltd. (54 Taxmann.com 75) — Cited in 6 Judgments | BharatTax