1. ACIT v. SSL-TTK

150 ITD 454Income Tax Appellate Tribunal2014#19230 most cited
4

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,339 Indian tax judgments — from 2019 to 2022.

Also reported as

52 SOT 20

Judgments citing 1. ACIT v. SSL-TTK

Asst. CIT Circle-9 (3)(1), Mumbai vs. M/S Fine Jewellery Manufacturing Ltd., Mumbai

The appeal stands dismissed

ITA 6854/MUM/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai01 Oct 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Mahavir Singh, Vp & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am (Hearing Through Video Conferencing Mode) 1. आयकरअपील िं./ I.T.A. No.6854/Mum/2019 (धििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2012-13) Acit Cc 9(3)(1), M/S Fine Jewellery Manufacturing Ltd. R. No. 215, 2Nd Floor बिाम/ Plot No. Gj/12 Seepz Sez Complex, Aaykar Bhavan, M. K. Road Andheri(E) Vs. Mumbai-400 020 Mumbai-400 096 स्थायीलेखा िं./ जीआइआर िं./ Pan/Gir No. Aaacf-5736-D (अपीलाथी/Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) : Assessee By : Shri Apurva Shah, Ld. Ar Revenue By : Ms. Usha Gaikwad, Ld. Sr. Dr ुनवाई की तारीख/ : 12/08/2021 Date Of Hearing घोषणा की तारीख / : 01/10/2021 Date Of Pronouncement आदेश / O R D E R Manoj Kumar Aggarwal ()

For Appellant: Shri Apurva Shah, Ld. ARFor Respondent: Ms. Usha Gaikwad, Ld. Sr. DR
Section 271G

…um/2016 dated 01/12/2018) and the decision of Jaipur Tribunal in ACIT V/s Gillette India Ltd. (54 Taxmann.com 313). Similar is the ratio of following decisions: - 1. ACIT vs. SSL-TTK (2012) 52 SOT 20 (URO) (Chennai)(Trib.) 2. ITO vs. Netsoft India Ltd. (2014) 150 ITD 454 (Mum.)(Trib.) 3. ACIT vs. M/s. Dilipkumar V. Lakhi [ITA No.2142/M/2017, A.Y. 2011-12 dated 02.08.2018 (Mum.)(Trib.) We find that facts are similar before us. Therefore, finding no infirmity in the impugned order, we dismiss the appeal. 8. Resultantly, the appeal stands dismissed. Order pronounced on 1st October, 2021. (Mahavir Singh) (Manoj Kuma…

1. ACIT v. SSL-TTK (150 ITD 454) — Cited in 4 Judgments | BharatTax