Loading ITAT cases…
67 orders · Page 2 of 2
The Tribunal allowed the assessee's request to withdraw the appeals. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal held that the documentary evidence was not considered by the lower authorities. Therefore, to serve the interest of justice, the matter was remanded back to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication after considering all evidence.
The Tribunal held that the rejection of the application for registration under Section 12AB was unjustified due to a mere technical error and restored the matter to the CIT(E) for fresh consideration on merits, allowing rectification of procedural errors. Consequently, the rejection of the Section 80G approval was also set aside and remitted.
The Tribunal found that the notice of hearing from the CIT(A)'s office was sent to an incorrect email ID, leading to the assessee's absence. Therefore, the appeal could not be adjudicated on merits.
The Tribunal permitted the assessee to withdraw the appeal as their grievance was redressed by the subsequent grant of registration.
The Tribunal held that the rejection of the application for registration under Section 12AB was unjustified due to a mere technical error and restored the matter to the CIT(E) for fresh consideration on merits, allowing rectification of procedural errors. Consequently, the rejection of the Section 80G approval was also set aside and remitted.
The Tribunal held that filing a return of income is mandatory to claim deductions under Section 80P. Since the assessee failed to file the return before the assessment was completed, the denial of the deduction by the AO and CIT(A) was upheld.
The Tribunal held that the appeal filed by the Revenue did not comply with the CBDT Circular as the tax effect was below the threshold limit. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed as not maintainable.
The ITAT condoned the delay in filing the appeal before the CIT(A) due to the unfortunate circumstances faced by the assessee and the "zero" tax demand notice. However, a cost of Rs. 10,000/- was imposed on the assessee.
The ITAT condoned the delay in filing the appeal before the CIT(A) by taking a lenient view and imposing a cost of Rs. 10,000/- on the assessee. The ITAT directed the CIT(A) to decide the appeal on merits.
The Tribunal held that the delay in filing Form 67 should not result in disallowance of FTC, especially when DTAA provisions allow for credit of taxes paid in foreign jurisdictions. The Tribunal followed its earlier decision in the assessee's own case.
The Tribunal allowed the assessee's request to withdraw the appeals. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal held that the assessee failed to provide sufficient evidence to substantiate the source of cash deposits. The lower appellate authority's decision to uphold the addition was based on the assessee's failure to pursue the appeal effectively and provide necessary documentation.
The Tribunal held that the Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM) is the most appropriate method for benchmarking royalty payments, upholding the assessee's position. The Tribunal also followed previous decisions regarding interest on ECB loans and outstanding receivables.
The Tribunal confirmed the addition for capital expenditure under Section 69C, as the assessee admitted it was capital in nature. However, the addition for unexplained cash credit under Section 68 was remitted to the AO for further inquiries into the source of funds from foreign bank accounts.
The Tribunal admitted the additional evidence, noting that it was crucial and not available to the lower authorities. The matter was remanded to the Assessing Officer to verify the income offered by the Telangana Housing Board and pass a fresh order.
The ITAT held that the CIT(A) should have adjudicated the appeal on merits and not dismissed it solely on the technicality of not filing a revised return. The tribunal emphasized that appellate authorities are bound to determine the correct taxable income and can entertain legitimate claims even if not originally filed or revised.