Loading ITAT cases…
66 orders · Page 2 of 2
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as withdrawn, acknowledging the settlement of the tax dispute under the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme. The Tribunal also noted that the appeal could be recalled if the settlement certificate was later withdrawn.
The Tribunal noted that upon issuance of Form No. 3, the appeals are deemed withdrawn. Therefore, the appeals were dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal allowed the assessees to withdraw their appeals as they had availed the Vivad se Vishwas scheme. The withdrawal was permitted with liberty to seek recall of the order if unforeseen circumstances arise.
The Tribunal noted that upon issuance of Form No. 3, the appeals are deemed withdrawn. Therefore, the appeals were dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal noted that upon issuance of Form No. 3, the appeals are deemed withdrawn. Therefore, the appeals were dismissed as withdrawn, with a provision to recall the order if the certificate is withdrawn later.
The Tribunal noted that upon issuance of Form No. 3, the appeal is deemed withdrawn. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn, with a provision to recall the order if the certificate is withdrawn later.
The Tribunal allowed the assessees' appeals to be dismissed as withdrawn. This was granted with liberty to seek recall of the orders if unforeseen circumstances arise.
The Tribunal allowed the assessees to withdraw their appeals as they had availed the Vivad se Vishwas scheme. The withdrawal was permitted with liberty to seek recall of the order if unforeseen circumstances arise.
The Tribunal allowed the assessee's application to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to seek recall of the order if unforeseen circumstances arise.
The Tribunal noted that upon issuance of Form No. 3, the appeals are deemed withdrawn. Therefore, the appeals were dismissed as withdrawn, with a provision to recall the order if the certificate is withdrawn later.
The Tribunal allowed the assessees' appeals to be dismissed as withdrawn. This was granted with liberty to seek recall of the orders if unforeseen circumstances arise.
The Tribunal allowed the assessees to withdraw their appeals as they had availed the Vivad se Vishwas scheme. The withdrawal was granted with liberty to seek recall of the order if unforeseen circumstances arise.
The Tribunal found that the AO had not conducted adequate inquiries regarding the fuel surcharge adjustment. Consequently, the Pr.CIT's order was set aside, and the matter was remitted back to the AO for fresh examination.
The Tribunal held that the AO should have considered the peak negative cash balance and prepared a cash flow statement. The addition of Rs. 78,583/- representing the peak negative balance was confirmed, but the separate additions for other negative balances were deleted.
The Tribunal noted that the tax dispute was settled under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, and the department did not object to the withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal to be dismissed as withdrawn, granting liberty to seek recall of the order if unforeseen circumstances arise. The Department did not object to this course of action.