ITAT Pune Judgments — May 2019

KARMYOGI SHANKARRAOJI PATIL SSK LTD.,PUNE vs ITO, PUNE

ITA 2233/PUN/2012[2009-10]Status: Disposed1 May 2019AY 2009-10Partly Allowed

The Tribunal decided to remit the issue of excessive cane price paid back to the Assessing Officer for re-adjudication based on Supreme Court guidelines. Other grounds of appeal were either dismissed, allowed, or dismissed as not pressed, depending on the specific facts and prior rulings.

SAHAKARMAHARSHI BHAUSAHEB THORAT SAH. SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD.,AHMEDNAGAR vs ACIT, A'NAGAR CIR., AHMEDNAGAR

ITA 1260/PUN/2011[2000-01]Status: Disposed1 May 2019AY 2000-01Partly Allowed

The Tribunal decided to remit the issue of excessive cane price paid back to the Assessing Officer for re-adjudication based on Supreme Court guidelines. Other grounds of appeal were either dismissed, allowed, or dismissed as not pressed, depending on the specific facts and prior rulings.

ASST. COMM. OF INCOME-TAX, AURANGABAD vs SIDDHESWAR SSK LTD., AURANGABAD

ITA 1628/PUN/2011[1993-94]Status: Disposed1 May 2019AY 1993-94Partly Allowed

The Tribunal decided to remit the issue of excessive cane price paid back to the Assessing Officer for re-adjudication based on Supreme Court guidelines. Other grounds of appeal were either dismissed, allowed, or dismissed as not pressed, depending on the specific facts and prior rulings.

SHRI DUDHGANGA VEDGANGA SAH: SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD,KOLHAPUR vs ACIT, KOLHAPUR

ITA 1088/PUN/2012[19997-98]Status: Disposed1 May 2019Partly Allowed

The Tribunal decided to remit the issue of excessive cane price paid back to the Assessing Officer for re-adjudication based on Supreme Court guidelines. Other grounds of appeal were either dismissed, allowed, or dismissed as not pressed, depending on the specific facts and prior rulings.

SHRI DUDHGANGA VEDGANGA SAH: SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD,KOLHAPUR vs ACIT, KOLHAPUR

ITA 1089/PUN/2012[1998-99]Status: Disposed1 May 2019AY 1998-99Partly Allowed

The Tribunal decided to remit the issue of excessive cane price paid back to the Assessing Officer for re-adjudication based on Supreme Court guidelines. Other grounds of appeal were either dismissed, allowed, or dismissed as not pressed, depending on the specific facts and prior rulings.

SHRI DUDHGANGA VEDGANGA SAH: SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD,KOLHAPUR vs ACIT, KOLHAPUR

ITA 1091/PUN/2012[2008-09]Status: Disposed1 May 2019AY 2008-09Partly Allowed

The Tribunal decided to remit the issue of excessive cane price paid back to the Assessing Officer for re-adjudication based on Supreme Court guidelines. Other grounds of appeal were either dismissed, allowed, or dismissed as not pressed, depending on the specific facts and prior rulings.

ACIT, KOLHAPUR vs SADASHIV MANDLIK KAGAL TALUKA SAHAKARI, KOLHAPUR

ITA 1116/PUN/2012[2008-09]Status: Disposed1 May 2019AY 2008-09Partly Allowed

The Tribunal decided to remit the issue of excessive cane price paid back to the Assessing Officer for re-adjudication based on Supreme Court guidelines. Other grounds of appeal were either dismissed, allowed, or dismissed as not pressed, depending on the specific facts and prior rulings.

ACIT, KOLHAPUR vs SHRI DUDHGANGA VEDGANGA SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD, KOLHAPUR

ITA 1443/PUN/2012[2007-08]Status: Disposed1 May 2019AY 2007-08Partly Allowed

The Tribunal decided to remit the issue of excessive cane price paid back to the Assessing Officer for re-adjudication based on Supreme Court guidelines. Other grounds of appeal were either dismissed, allowed, or dismissed as not pressed, depending on the specific facts and prior rulings.

ACIT, PUNE vs SHRI CHHATRAPATI SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD, PUNE

ITA 1497/PUN/2012[2008-09]Status: Disposed1 May 2019AY 2008-09Partly Allowed

The Tribunal decided to remit the issue of excessive cane price paid back to the Assessing Officer for re-adjudication based on Supreme Court guidelines. Other grounds of appeal were either dismissed, allowed, or dismissed as not pressed, depending on the specific facts and prior rulings.

SAHAKAR MAHARSHI SHANKARRAO MOHITE PATIL SSK,SOLAPUR vs DY. CIT CIR-I SOLAPUR, SOLAPUR

ITA 183/PUN/2012[1999-2000]Status: Disposed1 May 2019AY 1999-2000Partly Allowed

The Tribunal decided to remit the issue of excessive cane price paid back to the Assessing Officer for re-adjudication based on Supreme Court guidelines. Other grounds of appeal were either dismissed, allowed, or dismissed as not pressed, depending on the specific facts and prior rulings.

SATPUDA TAPI PARISAR SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD.,NANDURBAR vs JR. CIT, SPL. RANGE-I, NASHIK

ITA 1983/PUN/2012[1996-97]Status: Disposed1 May 2019AY 1996-97Partly Allowed

The Tribunal decided to remit the issue of excessive cane price paid back to the Assessing Officer for re-adjudication based on Supreme Court guidelines. Other grounds of appeal were either dismissed, allowed, or dismissed as not pressed, depending on the specific facts and prior rulings.

SHRI DATTA SHETKARI SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD.,KOLHAPUR vs DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,

ITA 2204/PUN/2012[2009-10]Status: Disposed1 May 2019AY 2009-10Partly Allowed

The Tribunal decided to remit the issue of excessive cane price paid back to the Assessing Officer for re-adjudication based on Supreme Court guidelines. Other grounds of appeal were either dismissed, allowed, or dismissed as not pressed, depending on the specific facts and prior rulings.

KUMBHI KASARI SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD,KOLHAPUR vs ACIT, KOLHAPUR

ITA 2221/PUN/2012[2006-07]Status: Disposed1 May 2019AY 2006-07Partly Allowed

The Tribunal decided to remit the issue of excessive cane price paid back to the Assessing Officer for re-adjudication based on Supreme Court guidelines. Other grounds of appeal were either dismissed, allowed, or dismissed as not pressed, depending on the specific facts and prior rulings.

KUMBHI KASARI SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD,KOLHAPUR vs ACIT, KOLHAPUR

ITA 2222/PUN/2012[2009-10]Status: Disposed1 May 2019AY 2009-10Partly Allowed

The Tribunal decided to remit the issue of excessive cane price paid back to the Assessing Officer for re-adjudication based on Supreme Court guidelines. Other grounds of appeal were either dismissed, allowed, or dismissed as not pressed, depending on the specific facts and prior rulings.

SHRI DUDHGANGA VEDGANGA SAH: SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD,KOLHAPUR vs ACIT, KOLHAPUR

ITA 1090/PUN/2012[1999-00]Status: Disposed1 May 2019AY 1999-00Partly Allowed

The Tribunal decided to remit the issue of excessive cane price paid back to the Assessing Officer for re-adjudication based on Supreme Court guidelines. Other grounds of appeal were either dismissed, allowed, or dismissed as not pressed, depending on the specific facts and prior rulings.

DY.CIT, CIR.-3(1), DHULE, DHULE vs SHIRPUR SHETKARI SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD., DAHIWAD

ITA 550/PUN/2011[1997-98]Status: Disposed1 May 2019AY 1997-98Partly Allowed

The Tribunal decided to remit the issue of excessive cane price paid back to the Assessing Officer for re-adjudication based on Supreme Court guidelines. Other grounds of appeal were either dismissed, allowed, or dismissed as not pressed, depending on the specific facts and prior rulings.

SIDHESHWAR SAH. SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD.,AURANGABAD vs DCIT, S.R.-2, AURANGABAD

ITA 1210/PUN/1997[1992-93]Status: Disposed1 May 2019AY 1992-93Partly Allowed

The Tribunal decided to remit the issue of excessive cane price paid back to the Assessing Officer for re-adjudication based on Supreme Court guidelines. Other grounds of appeal were either dismissed, allowed, or dismissed as not pressed, depending on the specific facts and prior rulings.

HUTATMA KISAN AHIR SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD,SANGLI vs DY. CIT, SANGLI

ITA 2255/PUN/2012[2009-10]Status: Disposed1 May 2019AY 2009-10Partly Allowed

The Tribunal decided to remit the issue of excessive cane price paid back to the Assessing Officer for re-adjudication based on Supreme Court guidelines. Other grounds of appeal were either dismissed, allowed, or dismissed as not pressed, depending on the specific facts and prior rulings.