51 orders · Page 2 of 2
The Tribunal held that the delay was not deliberate and was caused by a sufficient cause, emphasizing that substantial justice should be preferred over technical considerations. The Tribunal also found that the penalty notices under Section 271(1)(c) were not specific, as irrelevant portions were not struck off, indicating a non-application of mind by the AO.
Showing 51–51 of 51 · Page 2 of 2
