ITAT Nagpur Judgments — November 2018

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD -3(2), NAGPUR vs SHRI SUBROTO A.B. MUKHERJEE, NAGPUR

ITA 202/NAG/2018[2011-12]Status: Disposed28 Nov 2018AY 2011-12Dismissed

The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeals, primarily due to the inordinate and unexplained delay in filing. Additionally, the Tribunal noted that the tax effect in many cases was below the monetary limit prescribed by CBDT circulars for filing appeals.

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD -3(2), NAGPUR vs SHRI AVINASH LAXMIKANT DANI, NAGPUR

ITA 204/NAG/2018[2010-11]Status: Disposed28 Nov 2018AY 2010-11Dismissed

The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeals, primarily due to the inordinate and unexplained delay in filing. Additionally, the Tribunal noted that the tax effect in many cases was below the monetary limit prescribed by CBDT circulars for filing appeals.

INCOME TAX OFFICE, WARD 3(2), NAGPUR vs SMT PUSHPA H. NIMJE, NAGPUR

ITA 192/NAG/2018[2010-11]Status: Disposed28 Nov 2018AY 2010-11Dismissed

The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeals, primarily due to the inordinate and unexplained delay in filing. The Tribunal also noted that the tax effect was below the monetary limit prescribed by CBDT circulars for filing appeals.

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD -3(2), NAGPUR vs SHRE ARVIND PREMCHAND POTDAR, NAGPUR

ITA 194/NAG/2018[2010-11]Status: Disposed28 Nov 2018AY 2010-11Dismissed

The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeals, primarily due to the inordinate and unexplained delay in filing. Additionally, the Tribunal noted that the tax effect in many cases was below the monetary limit prescribed by CBDT circulars for filing appeals.

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 3(2), NAGPUR vs SMT ANNAPURANI VENKATESSAN, NAGPUR

ITA 205/NAG/2018[2012-13]Status: Disposed28 Nov 2018AY 2012-13Dismissed

The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeals, primarily due to the inordinate and unexplained delay in filing. Additionally, the Tribunal noted that the tax effect in many cases was below the monetary limit prescribed by CBDT circulars for filing appeals.

INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 3(2), NAGPUR vs SHRI SUDARSHAN RAMCHAND RA BOKADE, NAGPUR

ITA 186/NAG/2018[2009-10]Status: Disposed28 Nov 2018AY 2009-10Dismissed

The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeals, primarily due to the inordinate and unexplained delay in filing. Additionally, the Tribunal noted that the tax effect in many cases was below the monetary limit prescribed by CBDT circulars for filing appeals.

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 3(2), NAGPUR vs SHRI REHAN AHMED AZMI, NAGPUR

ITA 187/NAG/2018[2012-013]Status: Disposed28 Nov 2018AY 2012-013Dismissed

The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeals, primarily due to the inordinate and unexplained delay in filing. Additionally, the Tribunal noted that the tax effect in many cases was below the monetary limit prescribed by CBDT circulars for filing appeals.

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 3(2)`, NAGPUR vs SHRI MANOJ N DONGRE, NAGPUR

ITA 190/NAG/2018[2011-12]Status: Disposed28 Nov 2018AY 2011-12Dismissed

The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeals, primarily due to the inordinate and unexplained delay in filing. Additionally, the Tribunal noted that the tax effect in many cases was below the monetary limit prescribed by CBDT circulars for filing appeals.

INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD 3(2), NAGPUR vs SHRI SUDHIR VITHALRAO KHARBADE, NAGPUR

ITA 191/NAG/2018[2012-13]Status: Disposed28 Nov 2018AY 2012-13Dismissed

The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeals, primarily due to the inordinate and unexplained delay in filing. Additionally, the Tribunal noted that the tax effect in many cases was below the monetary limit prescribed by CBDT circulars for filing appeals.

INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD 3(2), NAGPUR vs SHRI JOLLY ABRAHAM, NAGPUR

ITA 196/NAG/2018[2013-14]Status: Disposed28 Nov 2018AY 2013-14Dismissed

The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeals, primarily due to the inordinate and unexplained delay in filing. Additionally, the Tribunal noted that the tax effect in many cases was below the monetary limit prescribed by CBDT circulars for filing appeals.

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 3(2), NAGPUR vs SHIRE SUBHASH UDHAROARO MESHRAM, NAGPUR

ITA 195/NAG/2018[2011-12]Status: Disposed28 Nov 2018AY 2011-12Dismissed

The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeals, primarily due to the inordinate and unexplained delay in filing. Additionally, the Tribunal noted that the tax effect in many cases was below the monetary limit prescribed by CBDT circulars for filing appeals.

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 3(2), NAGPUR vs SHRI ANIL SUKHDEO NITNAWARE, NAGPUR

ITA 200/NAG/2018[2010-11]Status: Disposed28 Nov 2018AY 2010-11Dismissed

The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeals, primarily due to the inordinate and unexplained delay in filing. Additionally, the Tribunal noted that the tax effect in many cases was below the monetary limit prescribed by CBDT circulars for filing appeals.

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD -3(2), NAGPUR vs SHRI RAMBHAU KHISADYA TAKTEWALE, NAGPUR

ITA 199/NAG/2018[2012-13]Status: Disposed28 Nov 2018AY 2012-13Dismissed

The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeals, primarily due to the inordinate and unexplained delay in filing. Additionally, the Tribunal noted that the tax effect in many cases was below the monetary limit prescribed by CBDT circulars for filing appeals.

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD -3(2), NAGPUR vs SHRI RAMKRISHAN PARASHRAM PIMPLIKAR, NAGPUR

ITA 201/NAG/2018[2011-12]Status: Disposed28 Nov 2018AY 2011-12Dismissed

The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeals, primarily due to the inordinate and unexplained delay in filing. Additionally, the Tribunal noted that the tax effect in many cases was below the monetary limit prescribed by CBDT circulars for filing appeals.

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD -3(2), NAGPUR vs SHRI UDAY RAJENDARA PANSE, NAGPUR

ITA 206/NAG/2018[2010-11]Status: Disposed28 Nov 2018AY 2010-11Dismissed

The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeals, primarily due to the inordinate and unexplained delay in filing. Additionally, the Tribunal noted that the tax effect in many cases was below the monetary limit prescribed by CBDT circulars for filing appeals.

INCOMET TAX OFFICER, WARD 3(2)`, NAGPUR vs SHRIE SANJEEV DIGAMBAR DESHPANDE, NAGPUR

ITA 183/NAG/2018[2010-11]Status: Disposed28 Nov 2018AY 2010-11Dismissed

The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeals, primarily due to the inordinate and unexplained delay in filing. Additionally, the Tribunal noted that the tax effect in many cases was below the monetary limit prescribed by CBDT circulars for filing appeals.

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 3(2), NAGPUR vs SHRI RAJGOPALAN VARDHANCHARI, AURANGABAD

ITA 185/NAG/2018[2013-14]Status: Disposed28 Nov 2018AY 2013-14Dismissed

The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeals, primarily due to the inordinate and unexplained delay in filing. Additionally, the Tribunal noted that the tax effect in many cases was below the monetary limit prescribed by CBDT circulars for filing appeals.

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD -3(2), NAGPUR vs SHRI RAJENDRA PRABHAKAR THENGDI, NAGPUR

ITA 189/NAG/2018[2010-11]Status: Disposed28 Nov 2018AY 2010-11Dismissed

The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeals, primarily due to the inordinate and unexplained delay in filing. Additionally, the Tribunal noted that the tax effect in many cases was below the monetary limit prescribed by CBDT circulars for filing appeals.

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 3(2), NAGPUR vs SHRI ANIL KESHAORAO BHAGAT, NAGPUR

ITA 193/NAG/2018[2011-12]Status: Disposed28 Nov 2018AY 2011-12Dismissed

The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeals, primarily due to the inordinate and unexplained delay in filing. Additionally, the Tribunal noted that the tax effect in many cases was below the monetary limit prescribed by CBDT circulars for filing appeals.

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 3(2), NAGPUR vs SHRI GOWARDHAN D CHAKOLE, NAGPUR

ITA 182/NAG/2018[2013-14]Status: Disposed28 Nov 2018AY 2013-14Dismissed

The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeals, primarily due to the inordinate and unexplained delay in filing. Additionally, the Tribunal noted that the tax effect in many cases was below the monetary limit prescribed by CBDT circulars for filing appeals.

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WRAD 3(2), NAGPUR vs SHRI SACHIN MAHADEORAO BHAGAT, NAGPUR

ITA 184/NAG/2018[2013-14]Status: Disposed28 Nov 2018AY 2013-14Dismissed

The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeals, primarily due to the inordinate and unexplained delay in filing. Additionally, the Tribunal noted that the tax effect in many cases was below the monetary limit prescribed by CBDT circulars for filing appeals.

INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD 3(2), NAGPUR vs SHRI SHESHRAO NAMDEORAO BHOYAR, NAGPUR

ITA 188/NAG/2018[2010-11]Status: Disposed28 Nov 2018AY 2010-11Dismissed

The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeals, primarily due to the inordinate and unexplained delay in filing. Additionally, the Tribunal noted that the tax effect in many cases was below the monetary limit prescribed by CBDT circulars for filing appeals.

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 3(2), NAGPUR vs SHRI GAJENDRA DASHOUNATH SOKUSARE, NAGPUR

ITA 197/NAG/2018[2013-14]Status: Disposed28 Nov 2018AY 2013-14Dismissed

The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeals, primarily due to the inordinate and unexplained delay in filing. Additionally, the Tribunal noted that the tax effect in many cases was below the monetary limit prescribed by CBDT circulars for filing appeals.