Loading ITAT cases…
70 orders · Page 2 of 2
The Tribunal held that the assessee was not seriously interested in prosecuting the appeal. Following established legal principles, the appeal was treated as unadmitted due to non-prosecution.
The Tribunal condoned the delay, finding sufficient cause due to the assessee's illness supported by a medical certificate. The matter was remitted back to the CIT(A) for a fresh decision on merits.
The Tribunal held that donations given to other trusts that did not carry out real charitable activities could not be considered as application of income for charitable purposes, thus denying exemption under section 11 for these donations. However, the issue regarding corpus donations was restored to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration.
The Tribunal found that Section 44AD was not applicable as the assessee's business was not civil construction and turnover exceeded the limit. The AO's assessment order lacked details on notice issuance, raising doubts about a proper hearing opportunity.
The Tribunal held that the AO's rejection of books of accounts without pointing out defects was not justified and directed deletion of the addition. For the sundry debtor issue, the Tribunal found insufficient clarity and remitted the issue back to the AO for fresh adjudication.
The Tribunal held that if the debit balance arose from sales duly accounted for, then any unrecorded payment by the debtor would lead to a double addition. The CIT(A)'s basis for sustaining the addition was based on surmises and conjectures.
The Tribunal held that since similar deductions for permission fees were allowed in earlier assessment years and had attained finality, the deduction for the current year should also be allowed based on the principle of consistency.
The Tribunal held that the disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) for non-deduction of TDS on roaming charges was incorrect. The Tribunal also dealt with issues related to foreign exchange gains and losses, bad debts, and assets written off, largely upholding the CIT(A)'s decisions.
The Tribunal held that the assessee satisfied all conditions for Section 10A deduction, including independent registration with STP Kolkata and export of software. It found no evidence of splitting or reconstruction of the old unit, noting the distinct registration periods and the personal nature of some expenses.
The Tribunal held that the appeals filed by the Revenue were not maintainable as the tax effect was less than the prescribed monetary limit. The CBDT instructions on monetary limits have statutory status due to Section 268A of the Income Tax Act.
The Tribunal held that interest expenses on loans to sister concerns are allowable if interest-free funds are available and exceed the loan amount. Business expenses related to rental income were partially allowed to cover establishment costs for statutory compliance. Repair and maintenance expenses were allowed as TDS was deposited within the due date of filing the return.
The Tribunal held that interest expenses on loans to sister concerns are allowable if interest-free funds are available and exceed the loan amount. Business expenses related to rental income were partially allowed to cover establishment costs for statutory compliance. Repair and maintenance expenses were allowed as TDS was deposited within the due date of filing the return.
The Tribunal held that rental income derived from letting out flats as an owner for a significant period should be treated as income from house property, following a previous decision in the assessee's own case. The issue of interest and finance charges was remanded to the AO for fresh consideration.
The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)'s order and restored the issue to the AO. The AO is directed to verify if the recipients of the payments have included these amounts in their income and paid taxes on them.
The Tribunal held that rental income derived from letting out flats as an owner for a significant period should be treated as income from house property, following a previous decision in the assessee's own case. The issue of interest and finance charges was remanded to the AO for fresh consideration.
The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s deletion of the Rs. 30 lakh bogus liability, finding the AO's addition to be on an estimated basis without proper justification. Similarly, the Tribunal agreed with the CIT(A) that the Rs. 2,27,765/- expenditure was revenue in nature. The third issue regarding Rule 8 was allowed for statistical purposes.
The Tribunal held that interest expenses on loans to sister concerns are allowable if interest-free funds are available and exceed the loan amount. Business expenses related to rental income were partially allowed to cover establishment costs for statutory compliance. Repair and maintenance expenses were allowed as TDS was deposited within the due date of filing the return.
The Tribunal held that interest expenses on loans to sister concerns are allowable if interest-free funds are available and exceed the loan amount. Business expenses related to rental income were partially allowed to cover establishment costs for statutory compliance. Repair and maintenance expenses were allowed as TDS was deposited within the due date of filing the return.
The Tribunal held that interest expenses on loans to sister concerns are allowable if interest-free funds are available and exceed the loan amount. Business expenses related to rental income were partially allowed to cover establishment costs for statutory compliance. Repair and maintenance expenses were allowed as TDS was deposited within the due date of filing the return.
The Tribunal held that interest expenses on loans to sister concerns are allowable if interest-free funds are available and exceed the loan amount. Business expenses related to rental income were partially allowed to cover establishment costs for statutory compliance. Repair and maintenance expenses were allowed as TDS was deposited within the due date of filing the return.