Loading ITAT cases…
62 orders · Page 2 of 2
The Tribunal permitted the assessee to withdraw its appeal as the assessee had opted for settlement under the 'Vivad Se Vishwas' scheme. The Revenue did not raise any objection to the withdrawal.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeals. The appeals were dismissed as withdrawn by the assessee.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeals. The appeals were dismissed as withdrawn by the assessee.
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeals, finding sufficient cause. However, since the assessee had opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme and sought withdrawal, the appeals were permitted to be withdrawn.
The Tribunal permitted the assessee to withdraw its appeal as the assessee had opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme to settle the matter.
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeals, finding sufficient cause. However, since the assessee opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme and applied for withdrawal, the appeals were permitted to be withdrawn.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's prayer to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn by the assessee.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeals. The appeals were dismissed as withdrawn by the assessee.
The Tribunal allowed the assessee to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn in view of the assessee's settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme.
The Tribunal permitted the assessee to withdraw its appeals as the matter was being settled under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. The Revenue did not object to the withdrawal.
The Tribunal permitted the assessee to withdraw its appeals as the matter was being settled under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. The Revenue did not object to the withdrawal.
The Tribunal held that initiating fresh reassessment proceedings while the first was still pending is not permissible in law. Furthermore, the AO's failure to dispose of the assessee's objections before passing the reassessment order vitiated the proceedings.