Loading ITAT cases…
119 orders · Page 3 of 3
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeals. The Tribunal allowed the appeals to be withdrawn as the assessee opted for the Vivad-se-Vishwas scheme.
The Tribunal allowed the assessee's request to withdraw the appeals. The assessee was granted liberty to approach the Tribunal to reinstate the appeals if the "Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme" application is rejected.
The Tribunal allowed the assessee's request to withdraw the appeals. Both the assessee's counsel and the Revenue's representative conceded to this request.
The Tribunal allowed the assessee's request to withdraw the appeals. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal allowed the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. The CIT(A) had already granted relief to the assessee, leaving no grievance for the assessee to pursue further.
The tribunal held that since Form(s)-3 under the Vivad Se Viswas scheme had been issued, there was no purpose in keeping the appeal pending. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn, with the option for the assessee to seek revival if the settlement benefit was denied.
The Tribunal held that since Form(s)-3 had been issued, there was no purpose in keeping the appeal pending. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn with a rider that it could be revived if the settlement benefit was denied for technical reasons.
The Tribunal held that since Form(s)-3 had been issued, there was no purpose in keeping the appeal pending. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal dismissed the appeals as withdrawn, stating that keeping them pending would serve no purpose as the settlement process was underway. The assessee was given the liberty to revive the cases if the settlement benefit was denied.
The Tribunal dismissed the appeals as withdrawn, stating that keeping them pending would serve no purpose as the settlement process was underway. The assessee was given the liberty to revive the cases if the settlement benefit was denied.
The Tribunal dismissed the appeals as withdrawn, stating that keeping them pending would serve no purpose as the settlement process was underway. The assessee was given the liberty to revive the cases if the settlement benefit was denied.
The Tribunal held that since Form-3 under the Vivad Se Viswas scheme had already been issued, there was no purpose in keeping the appeals pending. However, the assessee was given the liberty to revive the appeals if the settlement benefit was denied for technical reasons.
The Tribunal held that since Form-3 under the Vivad Se Viswas scheme had already been issued, there was no purpose in keeping the appeals pending. However, the assessee was given the liberty to revive the appeals if the settlement benefit was denied for technical reasons.
The Tribunal found no merit in the assessee's contention and dismissed the appeal as withdrawn. It clarified that the assessee could seek revival of the case if settlement benefits were denied for technical reasons.
The Tribunal held that since Form-3 under the Vivad Se Viswas scheme was issued, there was no purpose in keeping the appeal pending. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal held that since Form-3 under the Vivad Se Viswas scheme had already been issued, there was no purpose in keeping the appeals pending. However, the assessee was given the liberty to revive the appeals if the settlement benefit was denied for technical reasons.
The Tribunal found no merit in continuing the appeal as the assessee had opted for the settlement scheme. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to revive if settlement benefits are denied.
The Tribunal held that since Form(s)-3 under the Vivad Se Viswas scheme had been issued, there was no purpose in keeping the appeal pending. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal dismissed the appeals as withdrawn, stating that keeping them pending would serve no purpose as the settlement process was underway. The assessee was given the liberty to revive the cases if the settlement benefit was denied.