8 orders · Page 1 of 1
The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)'s order, directing him to decide the appeal on merits after condoning any delay and providing a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee.
The Tribunal held that the issue was covered by a coordinate bench's decision, which allowed appeals filed manually within the old provisions, even if later filed electronically with a delay. The CIT(A) was directed to decide the appeal on merits after condoning the delay.
The Tribunal set aside the order of the CIT(A) and directed him to decide the appeal on merits after condoning the delay in e-filing. This was based on a co-ordinate bench's decision which allowed similar appeals due to the transition to e-filing.
The Tribunal noted that the CIT(A) passed an ex-parte order without considering the assessment records or the appeal on merits. In the interest of justice, the matter was restored to the CIT(A) for de novo adjudication.
The Tribunal restored the matter to the CIT(A) for de novo adjudication, granting the assessee another opportunity to present their case. The CIT(A) was directed to pass a speaking order after affording sufficient opportunity of being heard.
The Tribunal restored the matter to the CIT(A) for de novo adjudication. The assessee was granted another opportunity to present their case before the CIT(A) to ensure justice.
The Tribunal found that the CIT(A) passed an ex-parte order without considering the assessment records or the merits of the appeal. Therefore, the matter was restored to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication.
The Tribunal restored the matter back to the CIT(A) for de novo adjudication. The CIT(A) was directed to pass a speaking order after affording sufficient opportunity of being heard to the assessee.