Loading ITAT cases…
1,392 orders · Page 26 of 28
The tribunal accepted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeals. The withdrawal was based on the assessee opting to settle the tax arrears under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn based on the settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
The Tribunal dismissed the assessee's appeal as withdrawn. However, it granted liberty to the assessee to approach for reinstitution if the dispute is not resolved under the VSV scheme.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn based on the settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The Senior DR had no objection to this request.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. This was based on the assessee opting to settle the tax arrears under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020.
The tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal allowed the assessee's application to withdraw the appeal. The dismissal was subject to the condition that if the dispute is not resolved under the VSV scheme, the assessee can seek reinstitution of the appeal.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeals. The appeals were dismissed as withdrawn by the Tribunal.
The assessee opted to settle the tax arrears under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020. The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal.
The tribunal accepted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The Senior DR had no objection to the withdrawal.
The Tribunal held that the statement of a co-accused, Ramendra Kumar Singh, could not be relied upon without corroboration and without allowing cross-examination. The assessee's own statement was also not corroborated by any incriminating material found during the search.
The tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. This was based on the assessee opting to settle the tax dispute under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020.
The Tribunal held that the statement of a co-accused, Ramendra Kumar Singh, could not be relied upon without corroboration and without allowing cross-examination. The assessee's own statement was also not corroborated by any incriminating material found during the search.
The Tribunal held that the statement of a co-accused, Ramendra Kumar Singh, could not be relied upon without corroboration and without allowing cross-examination. The assessee's own statement was also not corroborated by any incriminating material found during the search.
The Tribunal held that the statement of a co-accused, Ramendra Kumar Singh, could not be relied upon without corroboration and without allowing cross-examination. The assessee's own statement was also not corroborated by any incriminating material found during the search.
The Tribunal held that the additions were made solely on the basis of statements without corroborating evidence. The statement of a co-accused was not confronted to the assessee, and the assessee's own statement was not supported by any incriminating material found during the search.
The Tribunal held that the statement of a co-accused, Ramendra Kumar Singh, could not be relied upon without corroboration and without allowing cross-examination. The assessee's own statement was also not corroborated by any incriminating material found during the search.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn based on the settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as the dispute was settled under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
The tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as the assessee opted to settle the dispute under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeals. The appeals were dismissed as withdrawn by the Tribunal.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as the dispute was settled under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed in light of the settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeals. The appeals were dismissed as withdrawn by the Tribunal.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeals. The appeals were dismissed as withdrawn by the Tribunal.
The Tribunal noted the assessee's application under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme and dismissed the appeal as withdrawn. Liberty was granted to approach the Tribunal if the dispute could not be settled for technical reasons.
The Tribunal held that since the assessee did not earn any exempt income during the assessment year, no disallowance under Section 14A could be made. The addition was deemed wholly unjustified.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn in light of the settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeals. The Senior DR had no objection to the withdrawal.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal acknowledged the assessee's request and decided to consign the appeal to records, treating it as dismissed. However, this dismissal is subject to the condition that if the dispute is not resolved under the scheme, the assessee can seek reinstitution of the appeal.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for dismissal of the Revenue's appeals. This was based on the assessee's participation in the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme and the Revenue's lack of objection.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The tribunal accepted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn based on the assessee's settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.