Loading ITAT cases…
1,092 orders · Page 14 of 22
The Tribunal acknowledged that the matters had become infructuous due to the settlement under the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme. Consequently, both appeals were dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn in view of the settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
The Tribunal accepted the Assessee's request and dismissed the appeals filed by the Revenue. The Assessee's cross-objection was also dismissed as infructuous.
The Tribunal noted the assessee's request for withdrawal due to opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. The appeal was consigned to records and treated as dismissed, subject to the condition that it could be reinstituted if the dispute was not resolved under the scheme.
The tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn by the Tribunal.
The tribunal noted the assessee's decision to settle under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act and consequently consigned the appeal to records. The dismissal is conditional upon the dispute not being resolved under the Act.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The Senior DR had no objection to the withdrawal.
The tribunal accepted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn due to the settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
The Tribunal noted that the assessee had opted to settle the appeals under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020. Both parties agreed that the appeals should be treated as withdrawn and dismissed as infructuous.
The Tribunal acknowledged that the matters had become infructuous due to the settlement under the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme. Consequently, both appeals were dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal acknowledged the assessee's request for withdrawal due to the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. The appeal was consigned to records and treated as dismissed, subject to the condition that it could be reinstituted if the dispute resolution under the scheme failed.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal held that the appeal had become infructuous due to the assessee opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. Therefore, the appeal was treated as withdrawn by the Revenue and dismissed.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal noted the assessee's decision to settle the dispute under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act and requested withdrawal of the appeal. Consequently, the appeal was consigned to records and treated as dismissed.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeals. The Senior Departmental Representative had no objection to this request.
The tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn based on the assessee's settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal allowed the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. Liberty was granted to revive the appeal if the settlement under the scheme failed for technical reasons.
The tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The assessee requested withdrawal of the appeals under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020. The Senior DR had no objection to this request.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn based on the assessee's settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The tribunal accepted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal consigned the appeals to records and treated them as dismissed, subject to the condition that if the dispute is not resolved under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, the parties can seek reinstitution of the appeals.
The Tribunal ordered that the appeals be consigned to records and treated as dismissed, as the assessee had opted to settle the tax arrears under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020.
The tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal ordered that the appeals filed by both the assessee and the revenue be consigned to records and treated as dismissed, as the assessee had opted to settle the tax arrears under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
The Tribunal ordered that the appeals be consigned to records and treated as dismissed, as the assessee had opted to settle the tax arrears under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal noted the assessee's request for withdrawal due to opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. The appeal was consigned to records and treated as dismissed, subject to the condition that it could be reinstituted if the dispute was not resolved under the scheme.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal held that the Revenue's appeal was not maintainable as the tax effect was below the enhanced monetary limit prescribed by the CBDT circular. The appeal was dismissed based on this circular.
The tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal decided to consign the appeal to records and treat it as dismissed, subject to the condition that if the dispute is not resolved under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, the assessee can seek reinstitution of the appeal.
The Tribunal consigned the appeals to records and treated them as dismissed. However, the assessee can seek reinstitution if the dispute is not resolved under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
The Tribunal consigned the appeals to records and treated them as dismissed. However, the assessee can seek reinstitution if the dispute is not resolved under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.