Loading ITAT cases…
1,454 orders · Page 7 of 30
The Tribunal held that the CIT(A) should have adjudicated the appeal on merits, following the ratio of a High Court judgment. The matter was restored to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication.
The Tribunal held that the revised monetary limits for filing appeals, as per CBDT Circular No. 17/2019, are applicable to pending appeals in ITAT. Consequently, appeals with a tax effect below the revised limit are to be treated as withdrawn and are not maintainable.
The Tribunal decided that the appeals did not survive for consideration due to the revised monetary limits for filing appeals by the Department. The appeals were deemed withdrawn/not pressed.
The Tribunal decided that the appeals did not survive for consideration due to the revised monetary limits for filing appeals by the Department. The appeals were deemed withdrawn/not pressed.
The Tribunal held that the Departmental appeals were not maintainable due to the low tax effect, as per CBDT Circulars. Cross objections were either withdrawn or not pressed.
The Tribunal decided that the appeals did not survive for consideration due to the revised monetary limits for filing appeals by the Department. The appeals were deemed withdrawn/not pressed.
The Tribunal held that the appeal filed by the Revenue was not maintainable due to the revised monetary limit for filing appeals as per CBDT Circular No. 17/2019. This circular, applicable to pending appeals, raised the threshold to Rs. 50 lakhs.
The Tribunal held that the appeal of the revenue deserved to be dismissed due to low tax effect, as per CBDT Circular No. 17/2019 and its subsequent clarification. The circular was binding on tax authorities and applied retrospectively to pending appeals.
The Tribunal held that the Departmental appeals were not maintainable due to the low tax effect, as per CBDT Circulars. Cross objections were either withdrawn or not pressed.
The Tribunal held that the Departmental appeals were not maintainable due to the low tax effect, as per CBDT Circulars. Cross objections were either withdrawn or not pressed.
The Tribunal held that the appeal of the Revenue deserved to be dismissed on account of low tax effect, as per the binding CBDT circular and its subsequent clarification. The appeal was dismissed without going into the merits of the case.
The Tribunal held that the Departmental appeals were not maintainable due to the low tax effect, as per CBDT Circulars. Cross objections were either withdrawn or not pressed.
The Tribunal held that the Departmental appeals were not maintainable due to the low tax effect, as per CBDT Circulars. Cross objections were either withdrawn or not pressed.
The Tribunal held that the Departmental appeals were not maintainable due to the low tax effect, as per CBDT Circulars. Cross objections were either withdrawn or not pressed.
The Tribunal held that the Departmental appeals were not maintainable due to the low tax effect, as per CBDT Circulars. Cross objections were either withdrawn or not pressed.
The Tribunal held that the revised monetary limits for filing appeals, as per CBDT Circular No. 17/2019, are applicable to pending appeals in ITAT. Consequently, appeals with a tax effect below the revised limit are to be treated as withdrawn and are not maintainable.
The Tribunal held that the appeal of the Revenue deserved to be dismissed in limine due to low tax effect, as per the binding CBDT circular and its subsequent clarification.
The Tribunal decided that the appeals did not survive for consideration due to the revised monetary limits for filing appeals by the Department. The appeals were deemed withdrawn/not pressed.
The Tribunal held that the appeal filed by the Revenue was not maintainable due to the revised monetary limit for filing appeals set by the CBDT. The revised limit is applicable to pending appeals.
The Tribunal decided that the appeals did not survive for consideration due to the revised monetary limits for filing appeals by the Department. The appeals were deemed withdrawn/not pressed.
The Tribunal decided that the appeals did not survive for consideration due to the revised monetary limits for filing appeals by the Department. The appeals were deemed withdrawn/not pressed.
The Tribunal decided that the appeals did not survive for consideration due to the revised monetary limits for filing appeals by the Department. The appeals were deemed withdrawn/not pressed.
The Tribunal decided that the appeals did not survive for consideration due to the revised monetary limits for filing appeals by the Department. The appeals were deemed withdrawn/not pressed.
The Tribunal held that the appeal of the revenue deserved to be dismissed as the tax effect was below the prescribed limit. The circulars were binding on tax authorities and applied retrospectively to pending appeals.
The Tribunal held that the revised monetary limits for filing appeals by the Revenue, as per CBDT Circular No. 17/2019, are applicable to pending appeals in the ITAT. Consequently, appeals with a tax effect below the revised limit are to be treated as withdrawn and are not maintainable.
The Tribunal held that the revised monetary limits for filing appeals, as per CBDT Circular No. 17/2019, are applicable to pending appeals in ITAT. Consequently, appeals with a tax effect below the revised limit are to be treated as withdrawn and are not maintainable.
The Tribunal held that the revised monetary limits for filing appeals, as per CBDT Circular No. 17/2019, are applicable to pending appeals in ITAT. Consequently, appeals with a tax effect below the revised limit are to be treated as withdrawn and are not maintainable.
The Tribunal held that the revised monetary limits for filing appeals, as per CBDT Circular No. 17/2019, are applicable to pending appeals in ITAT. Consequently, appeals with a tax effect below the revised limit are to be treated as withdrawn and are not maintainable.
The Tribunal held that the appeals fall within the ambit of CBDT Circular No. 17/2019 and its subsequent clarification, which prescribe monetary limits for revenue appeals. Since the tax effect was below the prescribed limit, the appeals were dismissed.
The Tribunal held that the appeal of the revenue deserved to be dismissed as it fell within the ambit of CBDT Circular No. 17/2019 and its subsequent clarification, which prescribed a monetary limit for preferring appeals. The circular was binding on tax authorities and applied retrospectively to pending appeals.
The Tribunal held that the appeal filed by the Revenue was not maintainable due to the revised monetary limit for filing appeals, as per CBDT Circular No. 17/2019 and its subsequent clarification.
The Tribunal held that the revised monetary limits for filing appeals, as per CBDT Circular No. 17/2019, are applicable to pending appeals in ITAT. Consequently, appeals with a tax effect below the revised limit are to be treated as withdrawn and are not maintainable.
The Tribunal held that the Departmental appeals were not maintainable due to the low tax effect, as per CBDT Circulars. Cross objections were either withdrawn or not pressed.
The Tribunal held that the appeal of the revenue deserved to be dismissed in limine due to low tax effect, as it fell within the ambit of CBDT Circular No. 17/2019 and its subsequent clarification.
The Tribunal decided that the appeals did not survive for consideration due to the revised monetary limits for filing appeals by the Department. The appeals were deemed withdrawn/not pressed.
The Tribunal held that the Departmental appeals were not maintainable due to the low tax effect, as per CBDT Circulars. Cross objections were either withdrawn or not pressed.
The Tribunal held that the revised monetary limits for filing appeals, as per CBDT Circular No. 17/2019, are applicable to pending appeals in ITAT. Consequently, appeals with a tax effect below the revised limit are to be treated as withdrawn and are not maintainable.
The Tribunal held that the revised monetary limits for filing appeals, as per CBDT Circular No. 17/2019, are applicable to pending appeals in ITAT. Consequently, appeals with a tax effect below the revised limit are to be treated as withdrawn and are not maintainable.
The Tribunal held that the Departmental appeals were not maintainable due to the low tax effect, as per CBDT Circulars. Cross objections were either withdrawn or not pressed.
The Tribunal held that the revised monetary limits for filing appeals, as per CBDT Circular No. 17/2019, are applicable to pending appeals in ITAT. Consequently, appeals with a tax effect below the revised limit are to be treated as withdrawn and are not maintainable.
The Tribunal held that the revised monetary limits for filing appeals, as per CBDT Circular No. 17/2019, are applicable to pending appeals. Therefore, appeals with a tax effect below the revised limit are to be treated as withdrawn and are not maintainable.
The Tribunal held that the Departmental appeals were not maintainable due to the low tax effect, as per CBDT Circulars. Cross objections were either withdrawn or not pressed.
The Tribunal decided that the appeals did not survive for consideration due to the revised monetary limits for filing appeals by the Department. The appeals were deemed withdrawn/not pressed.
The Tribunal held that the Departmental appeals were not maintainable due to the low tax effect, as per CBDT Circulars. Cross objections were either withdrawn or not pressed.
The Tribunal held that the Departmental appeals were not maintainable due to the low tax effect, as per CBDT Circulars. Cross objections were either withdrawn or not pressed.
The Tribunal held that the Departmental appeals were not maintainable due to the low tax effect, as per CBDT Circulars. Cross objections were either withdrawn or not pressed.
The Tribunal decided that the appeals did not survive for consideration due to the revised monetary limits for filing appeals by the Department. The appeals were deemed withdrawn/not pressed.
The Tribunal held that the Departmental appeals were not maintainable due to the low tax effect, as per CBDT Circulars. Cross objections were either withdrawn or not pressed.
The Tribunal held that the Departmental appeals were not maintainable due to the low tax effect, as per CBDT Circulars. Cross objections were either withdrawn or not pressed.