Loading High Court cases…
3 orders · Page 1 of 1
The High Court held that the appeal did not involve a substantial question of law as the ITAT's decision was based on factual findings regarding the genuineness and creditworthiness of the transactions. Therefore, the High Court could not interfere with the ITAT's order.
The High Court held that the appeals against the rectification applications were redundant. This was because the appeals against the original ITAT order had already been admitted by the court.
The High Court held that the appeals against the rectification applications were redundant. This was because the appeals against the original ITAT order had already been admitted by the court.