M/S. GNG TRADING COMPANY PVT. LTD.,DELHI vs. ADDL. CIT, GURGAON
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessee failed to provide evidence to justify advances made, the applicability of Section 43B for unpaid sales tax, the creditworthiness of unsecured loan providers, the use of computers for business before the year-end, and supporting vouchers for labour charges.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal arose from an assessment order where the Assessing Officer disallowed interest expense on advances, added back unpaid sales tax, and disallowed depreciation on computers. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld these additions.
What were the issues?
Whether the disallowance of interest on advances, addition of unpaid sales tax, disallowance of depreciation, and addition of unsecured loans were justified due to lack of evidence.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 36(1)(3),Section 43B
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘C’ : NEW DELHI
Before: SH. N.K.BILLAIYA & SH. ANUBHAV SHARMA
Per Anubhav Sharma, JM :
The appeal has been filed by the Assessee against order dated 19.03.2015 Appeal no. 251/12-13 passed for assessment year 2010-11, by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-1, Gurgaon (hereinafter referred to as the First Appellate Authority or in short ‘Ld. F.A.A.’) in regard to the appeal before it arising out of assessment order dated 22.02.2013 u/s 143(3) of I.T. Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) passed by ACIT, Range-1, Gurgaon (hereinafter referred as Ld. Assessing officer or in short Ld. AO).
Del.2017 M/s. GNG Trading Company P. Ltd.
Heard. As the case was called for hearing, non-appeared for the assessee. The record shows since 11.01.2021 matter has bee
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 43B
- Vco Consulatatns and Sevices Private… vs ITO, Corporate Ward 3(3), ChennaiITA 2145/CHNY/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Siemens Gamesa Renewable Power Private… vs The Dy CIT Circle 8(2)(1), MumbaiITA 8020/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Amritvarsha Industries Limited, Ambedkar… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 6481/DEL/2026[2010-2011]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2010-2011
- Karaj Singh, Haryana vs PCIT (Central) Gurgaon, GurgaonITA 642/CHANDI/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- ACIT, Mumbai vs Imp Powers Limited, MumbaiITA 4982/MUM/2025[2012-13]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2012-13
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Manoj Kumar Das vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Superwealth Financial Enterprises Private Limited, Khordha vs. Joint Commissioner Good And Service Tax Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Simanchal Sahoo vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Prafulla Chandra Khatua, Mayurbhanj vs. The State Tax Officer Of CT And GST, MayurbhanjOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sidhivinayak Roadways, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise, Rourkela Commissionerate, RourkelaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026