ANANT JEWELLERS,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, NEW DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal set aside the orders of the CIT(A) and restored the matters for fresh adjudication. The assessee was directed to remove the defects by filing grounds of appeal.
What were the facts?
The assessee inadvertently failed to file grounds of appeal along with the appeal memo before the CIT(A). Consequently, the appeals were dismissed in limine by the CIT(A).
What were the issues?
Whether the appeals dismissed in limine for procedural defect (non-filing of grounds of appeal) should be restored to the appellate authority for adjudication on merits.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH: ‘SMC’ NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY
ORDER Captioned appeals have been filed by the assessee challenging two separate orders, both dated 09.12.2022, of learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-23, New Delhi, pertaining to assessment years 2017-18 and 2018-19.
I have considered rival submissions and perused the materials on record. Learned counsel appearing for the assessee submitted before me that the appeals filed before learned Commissioner (Appeals) were dismissed in limine, since, the assessee inadvertently did not file any grounds of appeal along & 304/Del/2023 AYs: 2017-18 & 2018-19 with the appeal memo. He submitted, though, the assessee filed submission contesting the additions made by the Assessing Officer, however, since no ground of appeal was filed, the appeals were dismissed in limine. Thus, learned counsel made a prayer to restore the matters back to learned Commissioner (Appeals) for enabling the assessee to rectify the defects by filing the grounds of appeal so that the appeals can be decided on merits.
Learned Departmental Representative agreed for restoration of the matters to the first appellate authority.
Having considered rival submissions in the context of facts and materials on record, I find that in the appeal memo filed before learned Commissioner (Appeals), the assessee did not raise any grounds of appeal, though, in course of appellate proceedings, the assessee filed submissions contesting the additions made by the Assessing Officer. Therefore, appeals filed by the assessee were defective.
Be that as it may, it is the submission of learned counsel for the assessee before me that due to sheer inadvertence, grounds of appeal were not filed along with appeal memo. Keeping in view the fact that assessee’s appeal were not decided on merits, in the interest of fair play and justice, I am inclined to set aside the 2 | P a g e & 304/Del/2023 AYs: 2017-18 & 2018-19 impugned orders of learned Commissioner (Appeals) and restore the matters back to him for fresh adjudication. The assessee is directed to remove the defects in the appeals by filing grounds of appeal before the first appellate authority. Once defects are removed, learned Commissioner (Appeals) shall decide the appeals on merits after providing due and reasonable opportunity of being heard to the assessee. Grounds are allowed for statistical purposes.
In the result, appeals are allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced in the open court on 31st March, 2023
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Prashanti Das (M/S. Panchamukhi Enterprises) vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Jagatsinghpur CircleOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- M/S Utkal Highways, Bidanasi vs. Union Of INDIAOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pradeep Kumar Behera vs. Superintendent CGST And Central Excise., CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Manas Behera vs. Commissioner, CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pramod Kumar Nayak vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, KendraparaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026