INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD - 3(1), PUNE vs. SHRADDHA & PRASAD JOINT VENTURE, PUNE
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the relationship between the joint venture and its members was not that of a contractor and contractee, and income should be taxed in the hands of the members. Following its own previous decisions and the CBDT circular, the Tribunal found no infirmity in the CIT(A)'s order.
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed against the CIT(A)'s order deleting the disallowance made under Section 40(a)(ia) for non-deduction of TDS by a joint venture on payments made to its members. The Assessing Officer treated these payments as sub-contracts and disallowed them for non-deduction of TDS.
What were the issues?
Whether payments made by a joint venture to its members for work executed are to be treated as sub-contracts attracting TDS provisions, and if not, whether disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) is warranted.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(7)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Radhasoami Satsang v. CIT1,695 citing193 ITR 321 · 1992 · SC
- CIT v. Gopal Purohit254 citing228 CTR 582 · 2011 · HC
- ITO v. Ch. Atchaiah149 citing218 ITR 239 · 1996 · SC · Read judgment
- Geo Consultants v. DIT21 citing304 ITR 283 · 2010
- 248 ITR 39912 citing248 ITR 399
- CIT v. Ambuja Darla Kashlog Mangu Transport Cooperative Society8 citing227 CTR 299 · 2009 · HC
- (i) CET v. Raj Kumar Singh 83 ITR 92 (SC). (ii) Kori V.B v. Asst.Professional Tax Officer6 citing197 ITR 321 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” BENCH, PUNE
Before: SHRI R.S.SYAL, VP & SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY, JM
आदेशानुसार / BY ORDER, // True Copy // धनजी सधचव / Private Secretary आयकर अपीलीय अधधकरण, पुणे / ITAT, Pune.
Date 1 Draft dictated on 13.05.2021 Sr.PS/PS 2 Draft placed before author 17.05.2021 Sr.PS/PS 3 Draft proposed and placed JM/AM before the second Member 4 Draft discussed/approved by AM/JM second Member 5 Approved draft comes to the Sr.PS/PS Sr. PS/PS 6 Kept for pronouncement on Sr.PS/PS 7 Date of uploading of order Sr.PS/PS 8 File sent to Bench Clerk Sr.PS/PS 9 Date on which the file goes to the Head Clerk 10 Date on which file goes to the A.R 11 Date of dispatch of order
More judgments on Section 40(a)(ia)
- Rekha Agarwal, Jaipur vs ITO WD 4(1), JaipurITA 844/JPR/2025[2021-22]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Cdg Petchem Limited, Hyderabad vs ITO, Ward - 1(1), HyderabadITA 1900/HYD/2025[2018-2019]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-2019
- M/S. Shree Laminators Ltd., Kolkata vs DCIT, Circle 4(4), KolkataITA 1534/KOL/2026[2011-2012]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2011-2012
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Sita Enterprises vs. Office Of The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Sri Tatiparthy Venkata Swamy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 25 Oct 2026
- Piyush Shantilal Veera vs. State Of U.P.Allahabad · 23 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Pooja Shri Traders vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - 1Madras · 23 Oct 2026