MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-1, LTU, NEW DELHI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 4227/DEL/2019Status: DisposedITAT Delhi22 May 2023AY 2007-082 pages

In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

Since the addition made by the Assessing Officer under Section 43B was deleted by the Tribunal, the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) on account of this addition does not survive. Therefore, the Assessing Officer is directed to delete the penalty.

What were the facts?

The Assessing Officer made a disallowance under Section 43B for property tax paid. The CIT(A) confirmed a part of this addition. Subsequently, the ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal against the addition.

What were the issues?

Whether penalty under Section 271(1)(c) can be sustained when the primary addition leading to the penalty has been deleted.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 43B,Section 271(1)(c),Section 147

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH: E: NEW DELHI

Before: SHRI CHANDRA MOHAN GARG & SHRI M. BALAGANESH

Hearing: 18.05.2023Pronounced: 22.05.2023

ORDER PER CHANDRA MOHAN GARG, J.M. This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 25.03.2019 of the Ld.CIT(A)-22, New Delhi, relating to Assessment Year 2007-08.

2.

This is an assessee appeal against the order of CIT(A) dated 25.03.2019 whereby CIT(A) has confirmed the amount of penalty of Rs. 25,08,012/- imposed by AO u/s. 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act 1961. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee’s case was selected for the re-assessment proceedings u/s. 147 of the Income Tax Act 1961 whereby AO via order dated 30.03.2015 made disallowance of Rs. 20,56,82,131/- u/s. 43B of the Income Tax Act 1961 on account of property tax paid. Thereafter the assessee filed an appeal before the CIT(A) against the order of Assessing Officer. The ld. CIT(A) confirmed the addition of Rs. 74,51,016/- u/s. 43B of the Income Tax Act 1961. Both assessee and revenue filed an appeal against CIT(A) order bearing and 4817/Del/2016 respectively before the Tribunal. The Tribunal via order dated 27.04.2023 allowed the assessee appeal and dismissed the revenue appeal. These facts have not been controverted by the ld. Senior DR.

3.

Consequently, deleting the entire addition of Rs. 74,51,016/- confirmed by CIT(A). since the above mentioned appeal of assessee has been allowed and addition made AO u/s. 43B has been deleted. Hence, penalty of Rs. 25,08, 012/- confirmed by the CIT(A) u/s. 271(1)(c) of the Act does not survive and hence we direct the Assessing Officer to delete the same.

4.

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed.

Order pronounced in the open court on 22.05.2023.

More judgments on Section 43B

All 7,161 judgments and leading authorities on Section 43B →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →