M/S JAMMU COOPERATIVE WHOLE SALE LIMITED,JAMMU vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-2 (1), JAMMU
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision that claims not made in original assessment proceedings cannot be agitated in reassessment proceedings unless related to escaped income. The Tribunal also found no error in the CIT(A)'s decision regarding the Section 40A(3) addition, directing the AO to re-examine it in light of amended provisions.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the CIT(A)'s order. The assessee did not appear for hearings, but the appeal was adjudicated on merits. The appeal challenged the rejection of a loss return filed in response to a Section 148 notice and a disallowance under Section 40A(3).
What were the issues?
Whether claims not made in original assessment can be raised in reassessment proceedings and whether the disallowance under Section 40A(3) was justified.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 148,Section 152,Section 40A(3)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AMRITSAR BENCH, AMRITSAR
Before: DR. M. L. MEENA & SH. ANIKESH BANERJEE
Per Dr. M. L. Meena, AM: This is an appeal filed by the Assessee against the order of the Ld. CIT(A)/NFAC, Delhi dtd. 12/08/2020, wherein the assessee has raised the following grounds: 1.That the order under appeal is against law and facts of the case.
That the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in law in not accepting that the Ld. AO erred in law in not accepting the loss return filed in reply to notice issued Under Section 148 of the I.T. Act.
That the Ld. CIT(A) has also erred in law in not accepting that in view of Section 152 of the I.T. Act the Ld. A.O erred in not dropping the proceeding started U/s 148. 4. That the Ld. CIT(A) has also erred in law in not accepting that the additi
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 148
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
- Adj Agri International LLP, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1)(1), RajkotITA 1198/RJT/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Jharkhand Contractors Association Thro Its President- Pramod Kumar vs. Bharat Coking Coal LTD. Thro Its Chairman Cum Managing DirectorJharkhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Isc Processors Private Limited vs. Superintendent,Range-Iv, Burrabazar Div, CGST And Cx, Kolkata (N) Commissionerate And AnrCalcutta · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Raashi Constructions vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Commercial TaxesKarnataka · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Bidasaria Fenster Solutions vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 13 Oct 2026
- Amit Agency vs. Commissioner, CGST And CxPatna · 13 Oct 2026